Liberal Democracy in Estonia: Cracks Behind the Seemingly Spotless Façade

Q2 Arts and Humanities Plural. History. Culture. Society Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.37710/plural.v11i1_7
Tõnis Saarts, Nikolai Kunitsõn, Raivo Vetik
{"title":"Liberal Democracy in Estonia: Cracks Behind the Seemingly Spotless Façade","authors":"Tõnis Saarts, Nikolai Kunitsõn, Raivo Vetik","doi":"10.37710/plural.v11i1_7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estonia is often seen as a model student among the post-communist countries. Many renowned think tanks and organizations measuring the quality of democracy (e.g., Freedom House, Varieties of Democracy, Bertelsmann Foundation) often give Estonia the highest scores in the region. However, the seemingly spotless façade hides growing tensions and emergent contradictions. The current paper will focus on the two most worrisome trends that have become evident in recent years, if not even earlier: (1) the limited success in integrating the large Russian-speaking minority and (2) the rise of the populist radical right. The failure to integrate the ethnic minorities would increase frustration and political alienation among Russian speakers, making it more difficult to build a healthy, cohesive democratic community. However, the rise of the populist radical right, namely the remarkable electoral success of EKRE (Estonian Conservative People’s Party), has proven to be a bigger challenge because it demonstrates that many Estonians are deeply dissatisfied with how democracy works in their country. The article discusses whether it would be possible for dissatisfied Estonians and Russians to join forces to challenge the current liberal democratic model in Estonia. The analysis shows that even if the initial attempts have failed, one could not entirely rule out that prospect.","PeriodicalId":36611,"journal":{"name":"Plural. History. Culture. Society","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plural. History. Culture. Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37710/plural.v11i1_7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estonia is often seen as a model student among the post-communist countries. Many renowned think tanks and organizations measuring the quality of democracy (e.g., Freedom House, Varieties of Democracy, Bertelsmann Foundation) often give Estonia the highest scores in the region. However, the seemingly spotless façade hides growing tensions and emergent contradictions. The current paper will focus on the two most worrisome trends that have become evident in recent years, if not even earlier: (1) the limited success in integrating the large Russian-speaking minority and (2) the rise of the populist radical right. The failure to integrate the ethnic minorities would increase frustration and political alienation among Russian speakers, making it more difficult to build a healthy, cohesive democratic community. However, the rise of the populist radical right, namely the remarkable electoral success of EKRE (Estonian Conservative People’s Party), has proven to be a bigger challenge because it demonstrates that many Estonians are deeply dissatisfied with how democracy works in their country. The article discusses whether it would be possible for dissatisfied Estonians and Russians to join forces to challenge the current liberal democratic model in Estonia. The analysis shows that even if the initial attempts have failed, one could not entirely rule out that prospect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱沙尼亚的自由民主:看似一尘不染的表面背后的裂痕
爱沙尼亚经常被视为后共产主义国家的模范学生。许多著名的智库和组织(如自由之家,民主的多样性,贝塔斯曼基金会)经常给爱沙尼亚在该地区的最高分。然而,在看似一尘不染的表面下,隐藏着日益加剧的紧张局势和层出不穷的矛盾。本文将重点关注近年来(甚至更早)已经变得明显的两种最令人担忧的趋势:(1)在整合大量讲俄语的少数民族方面取得的成功有限;(2)民粹主义激进右翼的崛起。如果少数民族无法融合,将增加俄语使用者的挫败感和政治疏离感,使建立一个健康、有凝聚力的民主社会变得更加困难。然而,民粹主义激进右翼的崛起,即爱沙尼亚保守人民党(EKRE)在选举中取得的显著成功,已被证明是一个更大的挑战,因为它表明许多爱沙尼亚人对他们国家的民主运作方式深感不满。本文讨论不满的爱沙尼亚人和俄罗斯人是否有可能联合起来挑战爱沙尼亚目前的自由民主模式。分析表明,即使最初的尝试失败了,也不能完全排除这种可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plural. History. Culture. Society
Plural. History. Culture. Society Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transnational Migration in the Moldovan- German Context, or: My Totul va fi bine (Road)trip Liberal Democracy in Estonia: Cracks Behind the Seemingly Spotless Façade 1989 – Annus Mirabilis for The Moldavian SSR The Chronotopos of the 1990s: Trauma and Triumph in Georgian Literary Texts Review, Catherine Durandin, Cécile Folschweiller (coord.), Enfances communistes. Mémoires de Roumanie et de République de Moldavie (Paris: Editions PETRA, 2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1