Zemahşerî'nin el-Keşşâf'ta Mu'tezilî Düşüncesini Yansıtan Tercihleri: Lütuf Teorisi Bağlamında Bir İnceleme

Muhammed BOŞNAK, Nagihan Ayşe BOŞNAK
{"title":"Zemahşerî'nin el-Keşşâf'ta Mu'tezilî Düşüncesini Yansıtan Tercihleri: Lütuf Teorisi Bağlamında Bir İnceleme","authors":"Muhammed BOŞNAK, Nagihan Ayşe BOŞNAK","doi":"10.31121/tader.1319989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Luṭf, which means delicacy, elegance, and favor in dictionary, as a concept, refers to God's di-recting his servants to faith and preventing them from committing sins. In general, the theory of luṭf, which was founded on the principle of ‘adl (justice) and moderation of the theory of aṣlaḥ (the optimal), was understood by the Mu'tazilites of Basra as making certain actions obligatory for Allah, and from this aspect, it caused controversies. These discussions were also reflected in the interpretation of the Qur’ān, and the verses were interpreted by Mu‘tazila to form a basis for the theory of luṭf. al-Zamakhsharī (d. 538/1144), who is a member of the Basra school of Mu‘tazila, defends the theses of his denomination in a scattered manner in al-Kashshāf. This situation, which appears between the lines, is known as the general feature of his tafsīr. This knowledge we have about the work in general needs to be confirmed through various examples. This study, prepared for this purpose, reveals how much the Mu‘tazilite aspect is reflected in his tafsīr, based on his ideas about luṭf in al-Kashshāf. As a matter of fact, while interpreting the verses about luṭf, he constantly emphasizes Mu‘tazilite principles and objects to opposing ideas through Mu‘tazilite arguments. In this respect, we can say that he acted like a Mu‘tazilite theolo-gian on the subject of luṭf. Our study aims to contribute to filling the gap in the literature by re-vealing this situation. In this regard, our research is limited to reading al-Kashshāf through the kalām literature within the framework of the theory of luṭf. Therefore, we will not go into the details of other theological issues, and our references to tafsīr works other than al-Kashshāf will be limited. Thus, theological background of al-Kashshāf will be scrutinized on one subject and this study will constitute a reference point for its denominational aspect.","PeriodicalId":488691,"journal":{"name":"Tefsir Araştırmaları dergisi","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tefsir Araştırmaları dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31121/tader.1319989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Luṭf, which means delicacy, elegance, and favor in dictionary, as a concept, refers to God's di-recting his servants to faith and preventing them from committing sins. In general, the theory of luṭf, which was founded on the principle of ‘adl (justice) and moderation of the theory of aṣlaḥ (the optimal), was understood by the Mu'tazilites of Basra as making certain actions obligatory for Allah, and from this aspect, it caused controversies. These discussions were also reflected in the interpretation of the Qur’ān, and the verses were interpreted by Mu‘tazila to form a basis for the theory of luṭf. al-Zamakhsharī (d. 538/1144), who is a member of the Basra school of Mu‘tazila, defends the theses of his denomination in a scattered manner in al-Kashshāf. This situation, which appears between the lines, is known as the general feature of his tafsīr. This knowledge we have about the work in general needs to be confirmed through various examples. This study, prepared for this purpose, reveals how much the Mu‘tazilite aspect is reflected in his tafsīr, based on his ideas about luṭf in al-Kashshāf. As a matter of fact, while interpreting the verses about luṭf, he constantly emphasizes Mu‘tazilite principles and objects to opposing ideas through Mu‘tazilite arguments. In this respect, we can say that he acted like a Mu‘tazilite theolo-gian on the subject of luṭf. Our study aims to contribute to filling the gap in the literature by re-vealing this situation. In this regard, our research is limited to reading al-Kashshāf through the kalām literature within the framework of the theory of luṭf. Therefore, we will not go into the details of other theological issues, and our references to tafsīr works other than al-Kashshāf will be limited. Thus, theological background of al-Kashshāf will be scrutinized on one subject and this study will constitute a reference point for its denominational aspect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扎马赫沙里在 al-Kashshāf 中反映穆塔齐莱思想的偏好:恩典理论背景下的分析
Luṭf,在字典里的意思是精致,优雅,恩惠,作为一个概念,指的是上帝指引他的仆人信仰,防止他们犯罪。总的来说,luṭf理论是建立在“adl”(正义)原则和aṣlaḥ(最优)理论的中庸原则之上的,巴士拉的穆塔齐利派将其理解为真主必须采取某些行动,并从这方面引起了争议。这些讨论也反映在对古兰经ān的解释中,穆塔齐拉对这些经文的解释形成了luṭf理论的基础。al- zamakhshari(公元538/1144年)是穆塔齐拉巴士拉学派的一名成员,他在al-Kashshāf以一种分散的方式为他的教派的论点辩护。这种出现在字里行间的情况,被称为他的tafs r的一般特征。我们对这项工作的总体认识需要通过各种例子来证实。这项研究正是为此目的而准备的,它揭示了他基于al-Kashshāf中关于luṭf的观点而得出的结论中有多少反映了穆塔齐勒派的观点。事实上,他在解读luṭf的经文时,不断强调穆太齐里派的原则,并通过穆太齐里派的论点来反对对立的观点。在这方面,我们可以说他在luṭf这个主题上表现得像一个穆太古派神学家。我们的研究旨在通过揭示这一情况来填补文献的空白。在这方面,我们的研究仅限于在luṭf理论的框架内通过kalām文献阅读al-Kashshāf。因此,我们将不深入其他神学问题的细节,并且我们对al-Kashshāf以外的tafs . r作品的参考将受到限制。因此,al-Kashshāf的神学背景将在一个主题上仔细审查,这项研究将构成其宗派方面的参考点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Some Ideas Accordıng To Classıcal And Modern Lınguısts On The Source Of The Quran In The Facılıty Of Arab Grammar The Role of The Socio-Cultural Environment and Political Relations in The Ishtihār of Qiraats Umbiguities in Translations of Qur'an and Tafsirs about the Meaning of the Verb "Farada" and a Solution Suggestion Ballıklızâde Ahmed Mâhir Efendi’nin el-Muhkem fî Şerhi’l-Hikem Adlı Eserinde İşârî Tefsir Ömer Rıza Doğrul'un Tanrı Buyruğu Meal/Tefsirinde Yahudilere ve Hıristiyanlara Yönelik Eleştirileri
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1