Drugs versus chemicals

None Michael McCoy
{"title":"Drugs versus chemicals","authors":"None Michael McCoy","doi":"10.1021/cen-10137-editorial","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most of the 9 years that C&EN has published its 10 Start-Ups to Watch feature—which appears this week on page 16—we’ve assessed drug and materials companies by separate financial standards. Start-ups focused on drugs typically raise much more money than materials firms in series A or other early funding rounds. For example, Alltrna, one of the three drug discovery firms we profiled last year, had $50 million in investor funding when it launched in 2021. The other two each raked in $100 million or more in their early investment rounds. By contrast, the chemical, agricultural, and clean technology start-ups we profiled were lucky to hit $30 million in their series A investment rounds, the stage in which companies typically transition from a promising concept to a full-fledged business. Sure, 10 companies are a small sample. But figures from the venture capital data firm PitchBook point to the same dichotomy.","PeriodicalId":9517,"journal":{"name":"C&EN Global Enterprise","volume":"68 31","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C&EN Global Enterprise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10137-editorial","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For most of the 9 years that C&EN has published its 10 Start-Ups to Watch feature—which appears this week on page 16—we’ve assessed drug and materials companies by separate financial standards. Start-ups focused on drugs typically raise much more money than materials firms in series A or other early funding rounds. For example, Alltrna, one of the three drug discovery firms we profiled last year, had $50 million in investor funding when it launched in 2021. The other two each raked in $100 million or more in their early investment rounds. By contrast, the chemical, agricultural, and clean technology start-ups we profiled were lucky to hit $30 million in their series A investment rounds, the stage in which companies typically transition from a promising concept to a full-fledged business. Sure, 10 companies are a small sample. But figures from the venture capital data firm PitchBook point to the same dichotomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物与化学品
9年来,C&EN发布了10家值得关注的初创企业专题(本周将出现在第16页),在这9年的大部分时间里,我们用不同的财务标准来评估制药和材料公司。在A轮或其他早期融资中,专注于药品的初创企业通常比材料公司筹集到更多的资金。例如,我们去年介绍的三家药物研发公司之一的Alltrna,在2021年成立时获得了5000万美元的投资者资金。另外两家公司在早期投资中都获得了1亿美元或更多的资金。相比之下,我们介绍的化工、农业和清洁技术初创企业在A轮投资中幸运地获得了3000万美元,在这一阶段,公司通常会从一个有前景的概念转变为一个成熟的企业。当然,10家公司只是一个小样本。但风险投资数据公司PitchBook的数据也指向了同样的两极分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FDA seeks to ban brominated vegetable oil Almac details expansion plans 2023 EPA Green Chemistry Challenge Awards recipients named EPA to rebuild endocrine disruptor program Pyrum eyes tire recycling in Czechia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1