Introducing the detailed semantic interface description to support a modular safety approval of automated vehicles – S 2 I 2

Björn Klamann, Hermann Winner
{"title":"Introducing the detailed semantic interface description to support a modular safety approval of automated vehicles – S <sup>2</sup> I <sup>2</sup>","authors":"Björn Klamann, Hermann Winner","doi":"10.1080/09617353.2023.2264729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe concept of a modular safety approval for automated vehicles dispenses with tests on vehicle or system level. Individually approved modules can be updated and reused without requiring new safety approvals. Similar to a system’s operational design domain description, an environmental description is required for a safety approval on module level. This paper presents how the environment of a module can be described at module interfaces. Uncertainty about other modules’ behaviour, dependencies between modules, and impacts of their outputs on the system behaviour are key reasons for missing specifications or tests of existing methods, leading to an erroneous approval of modules. To reduce uncertainties, we expand the state-of-the-art syntactical and semantic interface description and additionally describe dependencies to other modules’ behaviour or conditions and impacts of their outputs. The resulting detailed semantic interface description is categorised into syntax, semantics, influencing factors, and impacts. The novel description structure is a condensed way to consider the behaviour and its impacts on other modules in module development and testing. The description fundamentally supports the modular safety approval by identifying stimuli usually only seen during integration.Keywords: Safety approvalvalidationautomated drivingautonomous vehiclesmodularityinterfaceUNICARagil AcknowledgementThis research is accomplished within the project ‘UNICARagil’ (FKZ 16EMO0286).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementAll data analysed during this study are included in the Appendix of this published article.Additional informationFundingWe acknowledge the financial support for the projects by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF) based on a decision of the Deutsche Bundestag.Notes on contributorsBjörn KlamannBjörn Klamann finished his Master of Science Degree in Mechanical and Process Engineering at Technical University of Darmstadt. Since 2018 he is a research assistant at the Institute of Automotive Engineering at Technical University of Darmstadt. In his main research topic, the safety of automated vehicles, he investigates the approach of a modular safety approval.Hermann WinnerHermann Winner began working at Robert Bosch GmbH in 1987, after receiving his PhD in physics, focusing on the predevelopment of ‘by-wire’ technology and Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC). Beginning in 1995, he led the series development of ACC up to the start of production. Since 2002, he has been pursuing the research of systems engineering topics for driver assistance systems and automated driving as Professor of Automotive Engineering at the Technical University of Darmstadt. He discovered the ‘approval trap’ of autonomous driving, the still unsolved challenge to validate safety of autonomous driving before market introduction.","PeriodicalId":45573,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2023.2264729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe concept of a modular safety approval for automated vehicles dispenses with tests on vehicle or system level. Individually approved modules can be updated and reused without requiring new safety approvals. Similar to a system’s operational design domain description, an environmental description is required for a safety approval on module level. This paper presents how the environment of a module can be described at module interfaces. Uncertainty about other modules’ behaviour, dependencies between modules, and impacts of their outputs on the system behaviour are key reasons for missing specifications or tests of existing methods, leading to an erroneous approval of modules. To reduce uncertainties, we expand the state-of-the-art syntactical and semantic interface description and additionally describe dependencies to other modules’ behaviour or conditions and impacts of their outputs. The resulting detailed semantic interface description is categorised into syntax, semantics, influencing factors, and impacts. The novel description structure is a condensed way to consider the behaviour and its impacts on other modules in module development and testing. The description fundamentally supports the modular safety approval by identifying stimuli usually only seen during integration.Keywords: Safety approvalvalidationautomated drivingautonomous vehiclesmodularityinterfaceUNICARagil AcknowledgementThis research is accomplished within the project ‘UNICARagil’ (FKZ 16EMO0286).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementAll data analysed during this study are included in the Appendix of this published article.Additional informationFundingWe acknowledge the financial support for the projects by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF) based on a decision of the Deutsche Bundestag.Notes on contributorsBjörn KlamannBjörn Klamann finished his Master of Science Degree in Mechanical and Process Engineering at Technical University of Darmstadt. Since 2018 he is a research assistant at the Institute of Automotive Engineering at Technical University of Darmstadt. In his main research topic, the safety of automated vehicles, he investigates the approach of a modular safety approval.Hermann WinnerHermann Winner began working at Robert Bosch GmbH in 1987, after receiving his PhD in physics, focusing on the predevelopment of ‘by-wire’ technology and Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC). Beginning in 1995, he led the series development of ACC up to the start of production. Since 2002, he has been pursuing the research of systems engineering topics for driver assistance systems and automated driving as Professor of Automotive Engineering at the Technical University of Darmstadt. He discovered the ‘approval trap’ of autonomous driving, the still unsolved challenge to validate safety of autonomous driving before market introduction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介绍了详细的语义接口描述,以支持自动驾驶车辆的模块化安全认证- s2i2
摘要自动化车辆模块化安全批准的概念免除了对车辆或系统级别的测试。单独批准的模块可以更新和重用,而无需新的安全批准。与系统的操作设计领域描述类似,环境描述是模块级别安全批准所必需的。本文介绍了如何在模块接口上描述模块的环境。其他模块行为的不确定性、模块之间的依赖关系以及它们的输出对系统行为的影响是缺少现有方法的规范或测试的关键原因,从而导致模块的错误批准。为了减少不确定性,我们扩展了最先进的语法和语义接口描述,并额外描述了对其他模块的行为或条件的依赖关系及其输出的影响。生成的详细语义接口描述分为语法、语义、影响因素和影响。这种新颖的描述结构是在模块开发和测试中考虑行为及其对其他模块影响的一种简明的方法。该描述通过识别通常只在集成过程中看到的刺激,从根本上支持模块化安全批准。关键字:安全审批、验证、自动驾驶、自动驾驶汽车、模块化、接口UNICARagil确认本研究在UNICARagil项目(FKZ 16EMO0286)中完成。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明本研究中分析的所有数据都包含在本文的附录中。我们感谢德国联邦教育和研究部(BMBF)根据德国联邦议院的决定对项目提供的财政支持。关于contributorsBjörn KlamannBjörn的说明Klamann在达姆施塔特工业大学完成了他的机械和过程工程硕士学位。自2018年以来,他是达姆施塔特技术大学汽车工程研究所的研究助理。在他的主要研究课题,自动驾驶汽车的安全性,他调查了一个模块化的安全批准的方法。1987年,在获得物理学博士学位后,Hermann Winner开始在Robert Bosch GmbH工作,专注于“线控”技术和自适应巡航控制(ACC)的前期开发。从1995年开始,他领导了ACC的系列开发直到开始生产。自2002年以来,他一直从事驾驶辅助系统和自动驾驶系统工程课题的研究,担任达姆施塔特工业大学汽车工程教授。他发现了自动驾驶的“审批陷阱”,即在自动驾驶进入市场之前验证其安全性的难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: IJRQSE is a refereed journal focusing on both the theoretical and practical aspects of reliability, quality, and safety in engineering. The journal is intended to cover a broad spectrum of issues in manufacturing, computing, software, aerospace, control, nuclear systems, power systems, communication systems, and electronics. Papers are sought in the theoretical domain as well as in such practical fields as industry and laboratory research. The journal is published quarterly, March, June, September and December. It is intended to bridge the gap between the theoretical experts and practitioners in the academic, scientific, government, and business communities.
期刊最新文献
Introducing the detailed semantic interface description to support a modular safety approval of automated vehicles – S 2 I 2 A SaaS Concept Based Shopping Center Fire Risk Assessment Model for the Safety Management Applications OSS Sustainability Assessment Based on the Deep Learning Considering Effort Wiener Process Data A Study on the Prediction of COVID-19 Confirmed Cases Using Deep Learning and AdaBoost-Bi-LSTM model Assessment of emergency risk management and resilience engineering at management levels of a high hazard industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1