Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Constructive Deviance among Frontline Employees in Commercial Banks: Do Organizational Identification and Psychological Safety Matter?

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Contemporary Management Research Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.7903/cmr.22955
Henry Edosomwan, Tochukwu Oguegbe, Chiamaka Joe-Akunne, Leonard Ezeh
{"title":"Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Constructive Deviance among Frontline Employees in Commercial Banks: Do Organizational Identification and Psychological Safety Matter?","authors":"Henry Edosomwan, Tochukwu Oguegbe, Chiamaka Joe-Akunne, Leonard Ezeh","doi":"10.7903/cmr.22955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constructive deviance is a unique behavior that can promote performance and general organizational effectiveness. The mechanism connecting perceived organizational support to constructive deviance is under-researched in organizational behavior literature. Consequently, this study examined the moderating roles of organizational identification and psychological safety on the relationship between perceived organizational support and constructive deviance. A cross-sectional research design and a quantitative approach for data collection were utilized. Systematic and convenience sampling was used to select 203 frontline employees, 110 males and 93 females, from Delta State, Nigeria, commercial banks. Standardized self-report measures were used to collect participant data, while regression analysis (complemented with Model 1 of Hayes’ PROCESS Macro) was used to test the hypotheses. The results indicated that perceived organizational support, identification, and psychological safety positively and significantly predicted constructive deviance. Also, psychological safety moderated the relationship between perceived organizational support and constructive deviance, while organizational identification did not. The results highlight the importance of high and low levels of psychological safety in increasing and attenuating the relationship between perceived organizational support and constructive deviance. It was recommended that employees should be respected and valued for their contributions, their well-being should be prioritized, and the psychological and general safety climate should be well established in the organization.","PeriodicalId":36973,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Management Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.22955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Constructive deviance is a unique behavior that can promote performance and general organizational effectiveness. The mechanism connecting perceived organizational support to constructive deviance is under-researched in organizational behavior literature. Consequently, this study examined the moderating roles of organizational identification and psychological safety on the relationship between perceived organizational support and constructive deviance. A cross-sectional research design and a quantitative approach for data collection were utilized. Systematic and convenience sampling was used to select 203 frontline employees, 110 males and 93 females, from Delta State, Nigeria, commercial banks. Standardized self-report measures were used to collect participant data, while regression analysis (complemented with Model 1 of Hayes’ PROCESS Macro) was used to test the hypotheses. The results indicated that perceived organizational support, identification, and psychological safety positively and significantly predicted constructive deviance. Also, psychological safety moderated the relationship between perceived organizational support and constructive deviance, while organizational identification did not. The results highlight the importance of high and low levels of psychological safety in increasing and attenuating the relationship between perceived organizational support and constructive deviance. It was recommended that employees should be respected and valued for their contributions, their well-being should be prioritized, and the psychological and general safety climate should be well established in the organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商业银行一线员工组织支持感对建设性偏差的影响:组织认同与心理安全是否重要?
建设性偏差是一种独特的行为,可以促进绩效和总体组织效率。组织行为学文献对组织支持感与建设性偏差之间的关系机制研究较少。因此,本研究考察了组织认同和心理安全在组织支持感与建设性偏差的关系中的调节作用。采用横断面研究设计和定量方法收集数据。采用系统方便抽样的方法,选取尼日利亚三角洲州各商业银行的一线员工203人,其中男性110人,女性93人。采用标准化自我报告方法收集参与者数据,采用回归分析(辅以Hayes’s PROCESS Macro模型1)对假设进行检验。结果表明,组织支持感、认同感和心理安全感正向显著预测建设性偏差。此外,心理安全调节了组织支持感与建设性越轨行为的关系,而组织认同没有调节作用。研究结果强调了高水平和低水平的心理安全在增强和减弱组织支持感知与建设性偏差之间的关系中的重要性。建议应尊重和重视员工的贡献,优先考虑他们的福祉,并在组织中建立良好的心理和一般安全气氛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Management Research
Contemporary Management Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Key Determinants and Consequences of Brand Citizenship Behavior Factors Influencing Green Purchase Behavior: Price Sensitivity, Perceived Risk, and Attitude towards Green Products Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Constructive Deviance among Frontline Employees in Commercial Banks: Do Organizational Identification and Psychological Safety Matter? Positive Relationships between Service Performance and Social Media Use in Internet Retailing The Role of Community Engagement and Entrepreneurship in the Sustainability Performance of Social Ventures in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1