Age-related differences in vertical jump height and handgrip strength measurements

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.37190/abb-02229-2023-02
Kayla P. Sisneros, Pratibha S. Maurya, Evan B. Johnson, Benton R. Ford, Ty B. Palmer
{"title":"Age-related differences in vertical jump height and handgrip strength measurements","authors":"Kayla P. Sisneros, Pratibha S. Maurya, Evan B. Johnson, Benton R. Ford, Ty B. Palmer","doi":"10.37190/abb-02229-2023-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aimed to examine the effects of age on vertical jump height and handgrip strength measurements in women. A secondary aim was to investigate the correlations between vertical jump height and handgrip strength. Methods Twenty young (21.5 ± 2.8 years) and twenty older (67.0 ± 5.5 years) healthy women participated in this study. Handgrip contractions were used to assess strength measurements of peak force and rate of force development at different time intervals. Vertical jumps were performed on a jump mat. The jump mat measured vertical jump height based on flight time. Results The older women had lower vertical jump height (P < 0.001) and handgrip peak force (P = 0.028) and rate of force development values (P = 0.003-0.016) than the younger women. A larger difference was observed between the groups for vertical jump height (41%) than handgrip peak force and rate of force development (12-17%). Of all the strength measurements, handgrip rate of force development at 200 ms in the young (r = 0.502, P = 0.024) and older (r = 0.446, P = 0.049) women exhibited the strongest correlation with vertical jump height. Conclusions This investigation showed significantly lower vertical jump height and handgrip peak force and rate of force development values in older compared to younger women. Interestingly, the difference between age groups was larger for jump height than handgrip peak force and rate of force development. This suggests that vertical jump performance may be more severely affected by age than handgrip strength characteristics.","PeriodicalId":6897,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02229-2023-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to examine the effects of age on vertical jump height and handgrip strength measurements in women. A secondary aim was to investigate the correlations between vertical jump height and handgrip strength. Methods Twenty young (21.5 ± 2.8 years) and twenty older (67.0 ± 5.5 years) healthy women participated in this study. Handgrip contractions were used to assess strength measurements of peak force and rate of force development at different time intervals. Vertical jumps were performed on a jump mat. The jump mat measured vertical jump height based on flight time. Results The older women had lower vertical jump height (P < 0.001) and handgrip peak force (P = 0.028) and rate of force development values (P = 0.003-0.016) than the younger women. A larger difference was observed between the groups for vertical jump height (41%) than handgrip peak force and rate of force development (12-17%). Of all the strength measurements, handgrip rate of force development at 200 ms in the young (r = 0.502, P = 0.024) and older (r = 0.446, P = 0.049) women exhibited the strongest correlation with vertical jump height. Conclusions This investigation showed significantly lower vertical jump height and handgrip peak force and rate of force development values in older compared to younger women. Interestingly, the difference between age groups was larger for jump height than handgrip peak force and rate of force development. This suggests that vertical jump performance may be more severely affected by age than handgrip strength characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
垂直跳跃高度和握力测量的年龄相关差异
目的探讨年龄对女性垂直跳跃高度和握力测量的影响。第二个目的是调查垂直跳跃高度和握力之间的相关性。方法选取健康女性20例(21.5±2.8岁)和老年女性20例(67.0±5.5岁)。用握力收缩来评估不同时间间隔的峰值力和力发展速度的强度测量。垂直跳跃在跳台上进行,跳台根据飞行时间测量垂直跳跃高度。结果老年妇女垂直跳高较低(P <握力峰值值(P = 0.028)和力发展速率值(P = 0.003 ~ 0.016)均高于年轻女性。各组之间垂直跳跃高度(41%)的差异大于握力峰值和力发展率(12-17%)。在所有的力量测量中,年轻女性(r = 0.502, P = 0.024)和老年女性(r = 0.446, P = 0.049)在200 ms时的握力发展速率与垂直跳跃高度的相关性最强。结论与年轻女性相比,老年女性的垂直跳高、握力峰值和力发展速率值明显降低。有趣的是,年龄组间跳跃高度的差异大于握力峰值和力发展速度的差异。这表明垂直跳跃的表现可能更严重地受到年龄的影响,而不是握力特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics is a platform allowing presentation of investigations results, exchange of ideas and experiences among researchers with technical and medical background. Papers published in Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: Tissue Biomechanics, Orthopedic Biomechanics, Biomaterials, Sport Biomechanics.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of biomaterials with reference to biocompatibility dedicated for patient-specific finger implants Dynamic-passive correction of hallux valgus and associated static foot deformities Quantitative evaluation of stereoscopic augmented reality visualization using an optical see-through head-mounted display Analysis of Muscle Activity During Rowing Stroke Phases Experimental research of energy absorbing structures within helmet samples made with the additive manufacturing method - preliminary study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1