The Effect of Clonidine and Tramadol on Post-spinal Anaesthesia Shivering in Hysterectomy Patients: A Comparative Study

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOLOGY Advances in Human Biology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/aihb.aihb_37_23
Tushar Baria, Palak Anilkumar Chudasama, Milan Mehta
{"title":"The Effect of Clonidine and Tramadol on Post-spinal Anaesthesia Shivering in Hysterectomy Patients: A Comparative Study","authors":"Tushar Baria, Palak Anilkumar Chudasama, Milan Mehta","doi":"10.4103/aihb.aihb_37_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Spinal anaesthesia is most commonly used as a secure anaesthetic method in elective and emergency operations. Shivering is noted in 40%–70% of patients undergoing surgery under spinal anaesthesia. The study aims to compare the efficacy, haemodynamic effects and side effects of clonidine with tramadol for the control of shivering. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted from April 2016 to November 2016. Using a convenient sampling technique, a total of 60 adult patients of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Grade I or II, aged ≥18 years, of either sex who were scheduled hysterectomy administered with clonidine vis-à-vis tramadol for spinal anaesthesia were selected for the study after informed consent. All the patients were randomly allocated into one of the two groups using computer generated random number table: Group C: Injection clonidine 75 µg slow intravenous (IV) injection and Group T: Injection tramadol 1 mg/kg slow IV injection. Results: Non-significant association was found between age, ASA grade, level of sensory block, shivering grade and mean systolic blood pressure amongst the participants of group clonidine and tramadol. Group C had significantly early control of shivering, less time for complete loss of shivering and fewer adverse events were noted compared to the tramadol group. Conclusion: Both clonidine (75 µg) and tramadol (1 mg/kg) effectively treat patients with post-spinal anaesthesia shivering, but tramadol takes longer time for complete cessation of shivering than clonidine. Clonidine offers better thermodynamics than tramadol, with fewer side effects. The more frequent incidence of the side effects of tramadol, such as nausea, vomiting and dizziness, may limit its use as an anti-shivering drug.","PeriodicalId":7341,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Human Biology","volume":"393 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aihb.aihb_37_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal anaesthesia is most commonly used as a secure anaesthetic method in elective and emergency operations. Shivering is noted in 40%–70% of patients undergoing surgery under spinal anaesthesia. The study aims to compare the efficacy, haemodynamic effects and side effects of clonidine with tramadol for the control of shivering. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted from April 2016 to November 2016. Using a convenient sampling technique, a total of 60 adult patients of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Grade I or II, aged ≥18 years, of either sex who were scheduled hysterectomy administered with clonidine vis-à-vis tramadol for spinal anaesthesia were selected for the study after informed consent. All the patients were randomly allocated into one of the two groups using computer generated random number table: Group C: Injection clonidine 75 µg slow intravenous (IV) injection and Group T: Injection tramadol 1 mg/kg slow IV injection. Results: Non-significant association was found between age, ASA grade, level of sensory block, shivering grade and mean systolic blood pressure amongst the participants of group clonidine and tramadol. Group C had significantly early control of shivering, less time for complete loss of shivering and fewer adverse events were noted compared to the tramadol group. Conclusion: Both clonidine (75 µg) and tramadol (1 mg/kg) effectively treat patients with post-spinal anaesthesia shivering, but tramadol takes longer time for complete cessation of shivering than clonidine. Clonidine offers better thermodynamics than tramadol, with fewer side effects. The more frequent incidence of the side effects of tramadol, such as nausea, vomiting and dizziness, may limit its use as an anti-shivering drug.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可乐定与曲马多对子宫切除术患者脊髓麻醉后寒战的影响:比较研究
简介:脊髓麻醉是一种最常用的安全麻醉方法,用于选择性和紧急手术。40%-70%接受脊柱麻醉手术的患者会出现颤抖。本研究旨在比较可乐定与曲马多控制寒战的疗效、血流动力学影响及副作用。材料与方法:本前瞻性研究于2016年4月至2016年11月进行。采用方便的抽样技术,在知情同意后,共选择60名美国麻醉学会(ASA)身体状态为I级或II级的成年患者,年龄≥18岁,不限性别,均计划子宫切除术并使用可乐定vis-à-vis曲马多进行脊柱麻醉。采用计算机生成的随机数字表将所有患者随机分为两组:C组:注射可乐定75µg慢速静脉注射(IV), T组:注射曲马多1 mg/kg慢速静脉注射。结果:可乐定组和曲马多组患者的年龄、ASA等级、感觉阻滞水平、寒颤等级和平均收缩压之间无显著相关。与曲马多组相比,C组有明显早期的颤抖控制,更短的时间完全失去颤抖和更少的不良事件。结论:可乐定(75µg)和曲马多(1 mg/kg)均能有效治疗脊髓麻醉后寒战,但曲马多完全停止寒战所需时间较可乐定长。可乐定比曲马多热力学更好,副作用更少。曲马多更常见的副作用,如恶心、呕吐和头晕,可能会限制其作为抗颤抖药物的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the Efficacy of Natural and Synthetic Folic Acid on Human Health and Looking into a Better Alternative Effective Programmes to Reduce Inappropriate Dispensing of Antibiotics in Community Pharmacies Especially in Developing Countries Dengue Dynamics: A Global Update Evaluation of invasive tumour front in primary and secondary oral squamous cell carcinoma – A reliable prognostic parameter Study of the cellular senescence process in human umbilical cord Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1