Benchmarking the metal additive manufacturing processes using integrated AHP-PROMETHEE approach

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1504/ijpmb.2023.134149
M. Naveen Srinivas, K.E.K. Vimal
{"title":"Benchmarking the metal additive manufacturing processes using integrated AHP-PROMETHEE approach","authors":"M. Naveen Srinivas, K.E.K. Vimal","doi":"10.1504/ijpmb.2023.134149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to propose an integrated MCDM approach for the selection of the best process from the five-metal additive manufacturing (MAM) processes namely selective laser melting, direct metal laser sintering, laser engineered net shaping, electron beam melting, and wire arc additive manufacturing process at low production volume and high production volume scenarios. An integrated approach of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and preference ranking organisation method for enrichment evolution (PROMETHEE) is applied for the selection process. Twenty-four criteria have been identified from the literature and divided into five criteria groups namely process capability, mechanical properties, process efficiency, process economics, and sustainability. Results have shown that the proposed integrated approach can accomplish the goal of this study. According to the authors' knowledge there is no study considering both traditional criteria and sustainable criteria for the selection of the MAM process. This study will help the manufacturer to attain sustainable development goals.","PeriodicalId":52476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpmb.2023.134149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose an integrated MCDM approach for the selection of the best process from the five-metal additive manufacturing (MAM) processes namely selective laser melting, direct metal laser sintering, laser engineered net shaping, electron beam melting, and wire arc additive manufacturing process at low production volume and high production volume scenarios. An integrated approach of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and preference ranking organisation method for enrichment evolution (PROMETHEE) is applied for the selection process. Twenty-four criteria have been identified from the literature and divided into five criteria groups namely process capability, mechanical properties, process efficiency, process economics, and sustainability. Results have shown that the proposed integrated approach can accomplish the goal of this study. According to the authors' knowledge there is no study considering both traditional criteria and sustainable criteria for the selection of the MAM process. This study will help the manufacturer to attain sustainable development goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用集成AHP-PROMETHEE方法对金属增材制造过程进行基准测试
本文的目的是提出一种集成的MCDM方法,用于从五金属增材制造(MAM)工艺中选择最佳工艺,即选择性激光熔化、直接金属激光烧结、激光工程净成形、电子束熔化和线弧增材制造工艺,用于小批量和大批量生产场景。采用层次分析法(AHP)和富集进化偏好排序组织法(PROMETHEE)相结合的方法进行选择。从文献中确定了24个标准,并将其分为五个标准组,即过程能力,机械性能,过程效率,过程经济和可持续性。结果表明,所提出的综合方法能够达到本研究的目的。据作者所知,没有研究同时考虑传统标准和可持续标准的选择MAM过程。该研究将有助于制造商实现可持续发展目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking
International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Effective design and management of key processes is widely regarded as an important differentiator and source of competitive advantage in manufacturing, for profit services and public services. Processes permeate all facets of an organisation. Some processes exist within one functional area, while others cut across functional areas. IJPMB aims to cover both functional and business processes. Benchmarks, benchmarking and knowledge management are among the process improvement tools.
期刊最新文献
Case study based MCDM evaluation of manufacturing competency and strategic success Remanufacturing of end-of-life laptop based on remaining useful life prediction and quality grading with random forest and cluster analysis Unpacking the Impact of Rapid Delivery and Product Uniqueness on Quick Commerce Business Success using PLS SEM Exploring the Items for Measuring Cashless Transactions Behaviour Construct Related to Cognitive Attitudes Are direct and indirect real estate markets integrated Empirical evidence from India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1