Effect of Torso Boundary Conditions on Spine Kinematic and Injury Responses in Head-First Impact Assessed with a 50th Percentile Male Human Body Model

IF 0.7 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.4271/09-11-02-0014
M.I. Morgan, M. Corrales, P. Cripton, D.S. Cronin
{"title":"Effect of Torso Boundary Conditions on Spine Kinematic and Injury Responses in Head-First Impact Assessed with a 50th Percentile Male Human Body Model","authors":"M.I. Morgan, M. Corrales, P. Cripton, D.S. Cronin","doi":"10.4271/09-11-02-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>Computational and experimental studies have been undertaken to investigate injurious head-first impacts (HFI), which can occur during automotive rollovers. Recent studies assume a torso surrogate mass (TSM) boundary condition, wherein the first or first two thoracic vertebrae are potted and constrained to only move in the vertical loading direction. The TSM boundary condition has not been compared with a full body (FB) model computationally or experimentally for HFI. In this study, the Global Human Body Models Consortium 50th percentile male detailed human body model (M50-O, Version 6.0) was applied to compare the kinematic, kinetic, and injury response of an HFI with a TSM boundary condition (M50-TSM), and a full body boundary condition (M50-FB). Impacts (to M50-TSM and M50-FB) were simulated between the head and a rigid plate using a commercial FE code (LS-DYNA). The impact velocity of 3.1 m/s corresponded to the onset of spinal injury in diving reconstructions, and the impact velocity reported in experiments. The TSM boundary condition was simulated by applying a mass of 16 kg to the first thoracic vertebra (T1), and constraining motion to only the vertical direction. A quantitative comparison of the head and spine impact forces, spine kinematics, and prediction of hard tissue fracture was reported. The M50-TSM model demonstrated a 53.4% lower (straighter) spinal curvature 10 ms after impact, compared to the M50-FB. The lower curvature of the M50-TSM resulted in higher neck loads during that timeframe (2.26 kN M50-TSM, 1.44 kN M50-FB). The resulting hard tissue fracture in M50-TSM was attributed to direct compression at an early time (&amp;lt;5 ms) in the impact, while M50-FB demonstrated compression-extension fractures later (&amp;gt;16 ms) in the simulation. It was concluded that kinematics, kinetics, and injury response differed for the TSM and FB boundary conditions, and therefore these conditions are critical to consider when investigating HFI.</div>","PeriodicalId":42847,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/09-11-02-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational and experimental studies have been undertaken to investigate injurious head-first impacts (HFI), which can occur during automotive rollovers. Recent studies assume a torso surrogate mass (TSM) boundary condition, wherein the first or first two thoracic vertebrae are potted and constrained to only move in the vertical loading direction. The TSM boundary condition has not been compared with a full body (FB) model computationally or experimentally for HFI. In this study, the Global Human Body Models Consortium 50th percentile male detailed human body model (M50-O, Version 6.0) was applied to compare the kinematic, kinetic, and injury response of an HFI with a TSM boundary condition (M50-TSM), and a full body boundary condition (M50-FB). Impacts (to M50-TSM and M50-FB) were simulated between the head and a rigid plate using a commercial FE code (LS-DYNA). The impact velocity of 3.1 m/s corresponded to the onset of spinal injury in diving reconstructions, and the impact velocity reported in experiments. The TSM boundary condition was simulated by applying a mass of 16 kg to the first thoracic vertebra (T1), and constraining motion to only the vertical direction. A quantitative comparison of the head and spine impact forces, spine kinematics, and prediction of hard tissue fracture was reported. The M50-TSM model demonstrated a 53.4% lower (straighter) spinal curvature 10 ms after impact, compared to the M50-FB. The lower curvature of the M50-TSM resulted in higher neck loads during that timeframe (2.26 kN M50-TSM, 1.44 kN M50-FB). The resulting hard tissue fracture in M50-TSM was attributed to direct compression at an early time (&lt;5 ms) in the impact, while M50-FB demonstrated compression-extension fractures later (&gt;16 ms) in the simulation. It was concluded that kinematics, kinetics, and injury response differed for the TSM and FB boundary conditions, and therefore these conditions are critical to consider when investigating HFI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用第50百分位男性人体模型评估躯干边界条件对头部撞击中脊柱运动学和损伤反应的影响
已经进行了计算和实验研究,以调查汽车侧翻过程中可能发生的头部撞击(HFI)。最近的研究假设了一个躯干替代质量(TSM)边界条件,其中第一或前两节胸椎被装入并被限制仅在垂直加载方向上移动。对于HFI, TSM边界条件尚未与全体(FB)模型进行计算或实验比较。本研究采用全球人体模型联盟(Global Human Body Models Consortium)第50百分位男性详细人体模型(M50-O, Version 6.0),比较TSM边界条件(M50-TSM)和全身边界条件(M50-FB)下HFI的运动学、动力学和损伤反应。使用商用有限元代码(LS-DYNA)模拟头部与刚性板之间的碰撞(对M50-TSM和M50-FB)。3.1 m/s的撞击速度与跳水重建中脊髓损伤的发生速度一致,与实验报道的撞击速度一致。通过在第一胸椎(T1)上施加16 kg的质量,并仅在垂直方向上约束运动来模拟TSM边界条件。定量比较了头部和脊柱的冲击力、脊柱运动学和硬组织骨折的预测。与M50-FB相比,M50-TSM模型在撞击后10 ms脊柱弯曲度降低53.4%(更直)。在此期间,M50-TSM较低的曲率导致较高的颈部负荷(2.26 kN M50-TSM, 1.44 kN M50-FB)。M50-TSM在撞击早期(5ms)发生直接挤压导致硬组织骨折,而M50-FB在撞击后期(16ms)发生挤压-伸展性骨折。结论是TSM和FB边界条件的运动学、动力学和损伤反应不同,因此在研究HFI时,这些条件是至关重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety
SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Experimental Study on Ship Squat in Intermediate Channel Study of Vehicle-Based Metrics for Assessing the Severity of Side Impacts Distilled Routing Transformer for Driving Behavior Prediction Reviewers Thermal Modeling of the Electric Vehicle Fire Hazard Effects on Parking Building
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1