Estimating individual radio occultation uncertainties using the observations and environmental parameters

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, OCEAN Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1175/jtech-d-23-0029.1
Jeremiah Sjoberg, Richard Anthes, Hailing Zhang
{"title":"Estimating individual radio occultation uncertainties using the observations and environmental parameters","authors":"Jeremiah Sjoberg, Richard Anthes, Hailing Zhang","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0029.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Estimation of uncertainties (random error statistics) of radio occultation (RO) observations is important for their effective assimilation in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Average uncertainties can be estimated for large samples of RO observations and these statistics may be used for specifying the observation errors in NWP data assimilation. However, the uncertainties of individual RO observations vary, and so using average uncertainty estimates will overestimate the uncertainties of some observations and underestimate those of others, reducing their overall effectiveness in the assimilation. Several parameters associated with RO observations or their atmospheric environments have been proposed to estimate individual RO errors. These include the standard deviation of bending angle (BA) departures from either climatology in the upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere (STDV) or the sample mean between 40 and 60 km (STD4060), the local spectral width (LSW), and the magnitude of the horizontal gradient of refractivity (|∇ H N|). In this paper we show how the uncertainties of two RO data sets, COSMIC-2 and Spire BA, as well as their combination, vary with these parameters. We find that the uncertainties are highly correlated with STDV and STD4060 in the stratosphere, and with LSW and |∇ H N| in the lower troposphere. These results suggest a hybrid error model for individual BA observations that uses an average statistical model of RO errors modified by STDV or STD4060 above 30 km, and LSW or |∇ H N| below 8 km.","PeriodicalId":15074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0029.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Estimation of uncertainties (random error statistics) of radio occultation (RO) observations is important for their effective assimilation in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Average uncertainties can be estimated for large samples of RO observations and these statistics may be used for specifying the observation errors in NWP data assimilation. However, the uncertainties of individual RO observations vary, and so using average uncertainty estimates will overestimate the uncertainties of some observations and underestimate those of others, reducing their overall effectiveness in the assimilation. Several parameters associated with RO observations or their atmospheric environments have been proposed to estimate individual RO errors. These include the standard deviation of bending angle (BA) departures from either climatology in the upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere (STDV) or the sample mean between 40 and 60 km (STD4060), the local spectral width (LSW), and the magnitude of the horizontal gradient of refractivity (|∇ H N|). In this paper we show how the uncertainties of two RO data sets, COSMIC-2 and Spire BA, as well as their combination, vary with these parameters. We find that the uncertainties are highly correlated with STDV and STD4060 in the stratosphere, and with LSW and |∇ H N| in the lower troposphere. These results suggest a hybrid error model for individual BA observations that uses an average statistical model of RO errors modified by STDV or STD4060 above 30 km, and LSW or |∇ H N| below 8 km.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用观测和环境参数估计单个无线电掩星的不确定度
摘要:掩星观测的不确定性(随机误差统计量)估计对于数值天气预报(NWP)模式有效同化掩星观测具有重要意义。对于大样本的RO观测数据,可以估计出平均不确定性,这些统计量可用于指定NWP数据同化中的观测误差。然而,单个RO观测值的不确定性各不相同,因此使用平均不确定性估计将高估某些观测值的不确定性,而低估其他观测值的不确定性,从而降低其同化的总体有效性。与RO观测或其大气环境有关的几个参数已被提出用于估计单个RO误差。其中包括与平流层上层和中层下层气候学(STDV)或40 ~ 60 km的样本平均值(STD4060)的弯曲角(BA)偏差的标准偏差、局地光谱宽度(LSW)和折射水平梯度的大小(|∇H N|)。在本文中,我们展示了两个RO数据集COSMIC-2和Spire BA及其组合的不确定性如何随这些参数而变化。结果表明,这些不确定度与平流层的STDV和STD4060以及对流层低层的LSW和∇H N|高度相关。这些结果提出了单个BA观测的混合误差模型,该模型使用30 km以上的STDV或STD4060修正的RO误差平均统计模型,以及8 km以下的LSW或∇H N|修正的RO误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology (JTECH) publishes research describing instrumentation and methods used in atmospheric and oceanic research, including remote sensing instruments; measurements, validation, and data analysis techniques from satellites, aircraft, balloons, and surface-based platforms; in situ instruments, measurements, and methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation and assimilation in numerical models; and information systems and algorithms.
期刊最新文献
Synergistic retrievals of ice in high clouds from elastic backscatter lidar, Ku-band radar and submillimeter wave radiometer observations A Versatile Calibration Method for Rotary-Wing UAS as Wind Measurement Systems A Case of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension/Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome Cured by Myomectomy. Optimum Estimation of Coastal Currents Using Moving Vehicles Evaluation and Intercomparison of Small Uncrewed Aircraft Systems Used for Atmospheric Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1