Reviewing Research on Travel and the Built Environment: If You Don’t Like Meta-analysis, Try Meta-regression Analysis Instead!

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q2 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING Journal of Planning Education and Research Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1177/0739456x231197382
Mark R. Stevens
{"title":"Reviewing Research on Travel and the Built Environment: If You Don’t Like Meta-analysis, Try Meta-regression Analysis Instead!","authors":"Mark R. Stevens","doi":"10.1177/0739456x231197382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Commentary, I respond to a Commentary by Petter Næss that critiques the use of meta-analysis for reviewing the literature on travel and the built environment. I describe how each of Næss’s four challenges to the use of meta-analysis can be at least partially resolved through the use of meta-regression analysis instead. I also note important limitations of the literature review method that Næss recommends as an alternative to meta-analysis. While meta-regression is not a perfect method, I argue that it offers valuable features for understanding planning research that literature review and meta-analysis do not.","PeriodicalId":16793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","volume":"345 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x231197382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this Commentary, I respond to a Commentary by Petter Næss that critiques the use of meta-analysis for reviewing the literature on travel and the built environment. I describe how each of Næss’s four challenges to the use of meta-analysis can be at least partially resolved through the use of meta-regression analysis instead. I also note important limitations of the literature review method that Næss recommends as an alternative to meta-analysis. While meta-regression is not a perfect method, I argue that it offers valuable features for understanding planning research that literature review and meta-analysis do not.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旅游与建筑环境研究综述:如果你不喜欢元分析,试试元回归分析吧!
在这篇评论中,我对Petter Næss的一篇评论进行了回应,该评论批评使用元分析来回顾关于旅行和建筑环境的文献。我描述了Næss对使用元分析的四个挑战如何至少部分地通过使用元回归分析来解决。我还注意到Næss推荐的文献回顾方法作为元分析的替代方法的重要局限性。虽然元回归不是一种完美的方法,但我认为它为理解规划研究提供了文献回顾和元分析所没有的有价值的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of Planning Education and Research (JPER) is a forum for planning educators and scholars (from both academia and practice) to present results from teaching and research that advance the profession and improve planning practice. JPER is the official journal of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (ACSP) and the journal of record for North American planning scholarship. Aimed at scholars and educators in urban and regional planning, political science, policy analysis, urban geography, economics, and sociology, JPER presents the most vital contemporary trends and issues in planning theory, practice, and pedagogy.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives or Misperceptions? Why Better Land-Use Data Are Critical to Housing Policy Debates Introduction from New Editors-in-Chief Evaluating Urban Heat Mitigation across Networks of Plans Benchmarking Plans for Community-Based Small Business Resilience across Gulf Coast Counties Liminality of COVID-19: Knowledge to Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1