Between Democratic Modernization and Authoritarian Punitiveness in Brazil: Mass Incarceration, Political Rationalities and the Dynamics of Subnational Variation

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY British Journal of Criminology Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1093/bjc/azad050
David S Fonseca
{"title":"Between Democratic Modernization and Authoritarian Punitiveness in Brazil: Mass Incarceration, Political Rationalities and the Dynamics of Subnational Variation","authors":"David S Fonseca","doi":"10.1093/bjc/azad050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the return to democracy in the 1980s, the Federal government in Brazil promoted the democratic modernization of the criminal justice apparatus. However, the arrival of a post-neoliberal government to the federal administration at the beginning of the century took place simultaneously with the emergence of mass incarceration. Rather than readily blaming their penal policies for this development, the present work addresses aspects of subnational variation and different political rationalities for comprehending this increase in the prison population. The coexistence of neoliberal and post-neoliberal rationalities of governance around the country between 2007 and 2018 corresponded to significantly diverse trends in incarceration at the state level, in which neoliberal governments played a more prominent role. Besides, authoritarian punitiveness has acted as an obstacle to the modernization of crime and punishment practices and institutions throughout this period. The resurgence of authoritarianism as an autonomous political rationality in the 2018 elections reconfigured policies and attitudes in the field, mostly by reversing past modernizing efforts.","PeriodicalId":48244,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Criminology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azad050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Since the return to democracy in the 1980s, the Federal government in Brazil promoted the democratic modernization of the criminal justice apparatus. However, the arrival of a post-neoliberal government to the federal administration at the beginning of the century took place simultaneously with the emergence of mass incarceration. Rather than readily blaming their penal policies for this development, the present work addresses aspects of subnational variation and different political rationalities for comprehending this increase in the prison population. The coexistence of neoliberal and post-neoliberal rationalities of governance around the country between 2007 and 2018 corresponded to significantly diverse trends in incarceration at the state level, in which neoliberal governments played a more prominent role. Besides, authoritarian punitiveness has acted as an obstacle to the modernization of crime and punishment practices and institutions throughout this period. The resurgence of authoritarianism as an autonomous political rationality in the 2018 elections reconfigured policies and attitudes in the field, mostly by reversing past modernizing efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在巴西的民主现代化与专制惩罚之间:大规模监禁、政治合理性和次国家变化的动态
自20世纪80年代恢复民主以来,巴西联邦政府推动了刑事司法机构的民主现代化。然而,在本世纪初,一个后新自由主义政府对联邦政府的到来与大规模监禁的出现同时发生。与其轻易地将这一发展归咎于它们的刑事政策,本工作还探讨了地方差异的各个方面以及理解监狱人口增加的不同政治理性。2007年至2018年,新自由主义和后新自由主义治理理性在美国各地共存,与州一级监禁趋势的显著差异相对应,其中新自由主义政府发挥了更突出的作用。此外,在整个这一时期,专制惩罚已经成为犯罪和惩罚做法和制度现代化的障碍。威权主义作为一种自主的政治理性在2018年的选举中重新抬头,主要是通过逆转过去的现代化努力,重新配置了该领域的政策和态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Criminology
British Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Criminology: An International Review of Crime and Society is one of the world"s top criminology journals. It publishes work of the highest quality from around the world and across all areas of criminology. BJC is a valuable resource for academics and researchers in crime, whether they be from criminology, sociology, anthropology, psychology, law, economics, politics or social work, and for professionals concerned with crime, law, criminal justice, politics, and penology. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed articles, BJC contains a substantial book review section.
期刊最新文献
Policing and Sense of Place: ‘Shallow’ and ‘Deep’ Security in an English Town Working Through Desistance: Employment in Women’s Identity and Relational Desistance ‘Robocops’ in the Making: Reframing Police–Citizen Interactions Through the Lens of Body-Worn Cameras Building Trust and Honouring Agreements in the Supply of Protected Wildlife Products Making Good?: A Study of How Senior Penal Policy Makers Narrate Policy Reversal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1