Physical education teachers’ reality and experience from teaching during a pandemic

IF 2.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Sport Education and Society Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1080/13573322.2023.2254795
Iván López-Fernández, Francisco Javier Gil-Espinosa, Rafael Burgueño, Antonio Calderón
{"title":"Physical education teachers’ reality and experience from teaching during a pandemic","authors":"Iván López-Fernández, Francisco Javier Gil-Espinosa, Rafael Burgueño, Antonio Calderón","doi":"10.1080/13573322.2023.2254795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMost physical education (PE) research pertaining to COVID-19 has focused on the (negative) implications and difficulties PE teachers face during this pandemic period. In fact, despite informed calls for reform and radical change in PE, little attention has been paid to the (potentially positive) implications for teachers’ pedagogical practices and, more importantly, for the future of PE. Drawing on a social constructivism theoretical perspective, this paper explores the reality from several PE teachers’ perspectives and reflects on the type of PE that the global pandemic conditioned. We approached this analysis informed by Lawson, H. A. (2009. Paradigms, exemplars and social change. Sport, Education and Society, 14(1), 97–119.) and Quennerstedt, M. (2019. Physical education and the art of teaching: Transformative learning and teaching in physical education and sports pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society, 24(6), 611–623.) calls for the PE community to (re)act and drive PE to its twenty-first century version. Using methods associated with a process-oriented methodology, this study adopted a cross-sectional qualitative design, and 12 PE teachers with diverse backgrounds and teaching experiences participated. We conducted a series of semi-structured interviews that began with the following question: ‘How can the experience of blended or online PE contribute to the improvement of current and future PE?’ To analyse the data, an amalgamation of inductive and deductive approaches was used. Three major themes were constructed: (1) impact: PE teachers reinventing themselves to allow PE to continue being educative; (2) resilience: learning and flourishing together to overcome the challenge and improve the PE system; and (3) selective expansion: more physical activity (PA) and digital technology. We concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic has agitated the foundations of PE as a field, creating a scenario in which teachers show high levels of collegiality and improved readiness to overcome current and future challenges. This could be another stage of the PE journey towards community aspirations (whatever they could be).KEYWORDS: Blended learningonline learningdigital technologysecondary education AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the PE teachers participating in this study and the University of Málaga (Spain) for their support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Junta of Andalusia ‘INCA' educational research project (PIV-024/20). Rafael Burgueño is specifically supported by a ‘Margarita Salas’ postdoctoral fellowship (RR_A_2021_02) from the Spanish Ministry of Universities.","PeriodicalId":51203,"journal":{"name":"Sport Education and Society","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2023.2254795","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTMost physical education (PE) research pertaining to COVID-19 has focused on the (negative) implications and difficulties PE teachers face during this pandemic period. In fact, despite informed calls for reform and radical change in PE, little attention has been paid to the (potentially positive) implications for teachers’ pedagogical practices and, more importantly, for the future of PE. Drawing on a social constructivism theoretical perspective, this paper explores the reality from several PE teachers’ perspectives and reflects on the type of PE that the global pandemic conditioned. We approached this analysis informed by Lawson, H. A. (2009. Paradigms, exemplars and social change. Sport, Education and Society, 14(1), 97–119.) and Quennerstedt, M. (2019. Physical education and the art of teaching: Transformative learning and teaching in physical education and sports pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society, 24(6), 611–623.) calls for the PE community to (re)act and drive PE to its twenty-first century version. Using methods associated with a process-oriented methodology, this study adopted a cross-sectional qualitative design, and 12 PE teachers with diverse backgrounds and teaching experiences participated. We conducted a series of semi-structured interviews that began with the following question: ‘How can the experience of blended or online PE contribute to the improvement of current and future PE?’ To analyse the data, an amalgamation of inductive and deductive approaches was used. Three major themes were constructed: (1) impact: PE teachers reinventing themselves to allow PE to continue being educative; (2) resilience: learning and flourishing together to overcome the challenge and improve the PE system; and (3) selective expansion: more physical activity (PA) and digital technology. We concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic has agitated the foundations of PE as a field, creating a scenario in which teachers show high levels of collegiality and improved readiness to overcome current and future challenges. This could be another stage of the PE journey towards community aspirations (whatever they could be).KEYWORDS: Blended learningonline learningdigital technologysecondary education AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the PE teachers participating in this study and the University of Málaga (Spain) for their support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Junta of Andalusia ‘INCA' educational research project (PIV-024/20). Rafael Burgueño is specifically supported by a ‘Margarita Salas’ postdoctoral fellowship (RR_A_2021_02) from the Spanish Ministry of Universities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行期间体育教师教学的现实与体会
摘要大多数与新冠肺炎相关的体育教育研究都集中在体育教师在疫情期间面临的(负面)影响和困难上。事实上,尽管对体育改革和彻底改变的呼吁是明智的,但很少有人注意到(潜在的)对教师教学实践的影响,更重要的是,对体育的未来的影响。本文运用社会建构主义的理论视角,从几位体育教师的角度来探讨现实,反思全球大流行所造就的体育类型。我们采用了Lawson, H. A.(2009)提供的分析方法。范例,典范和社会变革。[3]王晓明,王晓明。(2019.)体育教育与教学艺术:体育教育与体育教育学中的变革学习与教学。体育,教育与社会,24(6),611-623 .)呼吁体育社区(重新)行动,推动体育到二十一世纪的版本。本研究采用面向过程的研究方法,采用横断面定性设计,选取了12名具有不同背景和教学经验的体育教师参与研究。我们进行了一系列半结构化的访谈,以以下问题开始:“混合或在线体育的经验如何有助于改善当前和未来的体育?”为了分析数据,采用了归纳和演绎方法的结合。本文构建了三个主要主题:(1)影响:体育教师重塑自我,使体育继续具有教育意义;(2)弹性:学习与繁荣共同克服挑战,完善体育体系;(3)选择性扩展:更多的体育活动(PA)和数字技术。我们的结论是,2019冠状病毒病大流行动摇了体育作为一个领域的基础,创造了一种情景,教师表现出高度的合作精神,并为克服当前和未来的挑战做好了更好的准备。这可能是实现社区愿望的体育之旅的另一个阶段(无论他们是什么)。作者感谢参与本研究的体育教师和西班牙Málaga大学的支持。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究得到了安达卢西亚军政府“INCA”教育研究项目(PIV-024/20)的支持。Rafael Burgueño得到了西班牙大学教育部的“Margarita Salas”博士后奖学金(RR_A_2021_02)的特别支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sport Education and Society
Sport Education and Society 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
20.70%
发文量
77
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sport, Education and Society is an international journal which provides a focal point for the publication of social science research on pedagogy, policy and the body in society and the wide range of associated social, cultural, political and ethical issues in physical activity, sport and health. The journal concentrates both on the forms, contents and contexts of physical education, sport and health education found in schools, colleges and other sites of formal education, as well as the pedagogies of play, calisthenics, gymnastics, sport and leisure found in familial contexts, sports clubs, the leisure industry, private fitness and health studios, dance schools and rehabilitation centres. In addition to papers reporting original research, Sport, Education and Society will also consider various media (e.g., TV, film, web sites) as forms of pedagogy and report their impact on understandings of the body in society. Sport, Education and Society encourages contributions not only from social scientists and educationalists studying the relationships between pedagogy, ‘the body’ and society, but from all professionals with interests in theoretical and empirical interests relating to policy, curriculum, social inclusion, equity and identity, and progressive educational development in physical activity, health and sport.
期刊最新文献
Critical reflections on the design, delivery and analysis of education in sport for development Habitus, capital and the shaping of sporting careers: a qualitative study of Norwegian youth Exploration and creation of meaningful teacher educator practises in physical education teacher education ‘It’s like being there, but not in the way'. Exploring the use of virtual reality tools to stimulate reflection in Norwegian physical education teacher education The transformational possibilities of liberal vocationalism: a case study of post-year 10 Outdoor Education in Western Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1