Mentalization, emotional dysregulation and attachment to alternative attachment figures in retrospectively defined earned secure adults

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.5114/cipp/172328
Monika Olga Jańczak
{"title":"Mentalization, emotional dysregulation and attachment to alternative attachment figures in retrospectively defined earned secure adults","authors":"Monika Olga Jańczak","doi":"10.5114/cipp/172328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Researchers have tried to identify mechanisms through which an individual overcomes negative life experiences, proposing earning security as one of them. Retrospectively defined earned secures are recognized as individuals exhibiting secure attachments to their parents while evaluating the quality of their childhood care as low. This study aimed to examine at-tachment, mentalization, and emotional dysregulation in this group. We hypothesized that earned secures will report better mentalizing, lower emotion dysregulation, and more secure attachment to figures other than parents than insecure individuals. Participants and procedure A female adult sample (N = 272) completed the Experiences in Close Relationships–Relationship Structures questionnaire, Parental Bonding Instrument, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, and Mental State Task. The time devoted to psycho-therapy and demographics were also controlled as contextual variables. Results We identified an ‘earned secure’ group (14% of the sample), exhibiting secure attachment to mothers in adulthood despite reported inadequate care during childhood, along with the continuously secure, insecure, and ‘lost secure’ groups. People from the earned secure and secure groups reported better emotional regulation and some aspects of mentalization than those in the insecure and lost secure groups. They equally frequently reported the presence of an adult other than parents who were important to them in childhood, but the attachment to them was more secure. We did not find evidence of differ-ences between the groups in the duration of psychotherapy. Conclusions Secure attachment to alternative attachment figures, along with some mentalization and emotional regulation aspects, may be considered significant factors for earning security.","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/172328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Researchers have tried to identify mechanisms through which an individual overcomes negative life experiences, proposing earning security as one of them. Retrospectively defined earned secures are recognized as individuals exhibiting secure attachments to their parents while evaluating the quality of their childhood care as low. This study aimed to examine at-tachment, mentalization, and emotional dysregulation in this group. We hypothesized that earned secures will report better mentalizing, lower emotion dysregulation, and more secure attachment to figures other than parents than insecure individuals. Participants and procedure A female adult sample (N = 272) completed the Experiences in Close Relationships–Relationship Structures questionnaire, Parental Bonding Instrument, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, and Mental State Task. The time devoted to psycho-therapy and demographics were also controlled as contextual variables. Results We identified an ‘earned secure’ group (14% of the sample), exhibiting secure attachment to mothers in adulthood despite reported inadequate care during childhood, along with the continuously secure, insecure, and ‘lost secure’ groups. People from the earned secure and secure groups reported better emotional regulation and some aspects of mentalization than those in the insecure and lost secure groups. They equally frequently reported the presence of an adult other than parents who were important to them in childhood, but the attachment to them was more secure. We did not find evidence of differ-ences between the groups in the duration of psychotherapy. Conclusions Secure attachment to alternative attachment figures, along with some mentalization and emotional regulation aspects, may be considered significant factors for earning security.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理化、情绪失调和对另类依恋人物的依恋
研究人员试图找出个体克服消极生活经历的机制,并提出获得安全感是其中之一。回顾性定义的“挣得安全感”被认为是对父母表现出安全依恋的个体,同时评估他们的童年护理质量较低。本研究旨在检查依恋、心智化和情绪失调。我们假设,与没有安全感的人相比,获得安全感的人会表现出更好的心理化,更低的情绪失调,以及对父母以外的人更安全的依恋。选取272名成年女性,完成了亲密关系体验-关系结构问卷、父母关系量表、情绪调节困难量表和心理状态问卷。用于心理治疗的时间和人口统计数据也作为上下文变量进行控制。结果:我们确定了一个“获得安全”组(占样本的14%),尽管在童年时期缺乏足够的照顾,但成年后对母亲表现出安全的依恋,以及持续安全、不安全和“失去安全”组。获得安全感和安全感组的人比不安全感和失去安全感组的人表现出更好的情绪调节能力和心理化的某些方面。他们同样频繁地报告说,除了在童年时期对他们很重要的父母之外,还有一个成年人在场,但对他们的依恋更安全。我们没有发现两组在心理治疗持续时间上有差异的证据。结论对备选依恋对象的安全依恋,以及某些心理化和情绪调节方面,可能被认为是获得安全感的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Who agrees more? The role of age, education, and the ability to solve verbal analogies in acquiescence Psychometric properties of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory for Children and Adolescents (TIPI-CA) in a Spanish sample Daily state of motivation as the effect of appreciation in a diary study. The effect of risk of contracting and fear of COVID-19 on burnout and job satisfaction in Polish teachers Sexual satisfaction and oversexualization among adults. The moderating role of self-esteem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1