Switch to generic formulation of temozolomide results in statistically significant increase in grade 3 and 4 bone marrow toxicity in glioma patients in the province of Alberta
Egiroh Omene, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Eugene Batuyong, Samir Patel, Roland Coppens, Jacob Easaw, Kelvin Young
{"title":"Switch to generic formulation of temozolomide results in statistically significant increase in grade 3 and 4 bone marrow toxicity in glioma patients in the province of Alberta","authors":"Egiroh Omene, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Eugene Batuyong, Samir Patel, Roland Coppens, Jacob Easaw, Kelvin Young","doi":"10.1093/nop/npad065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral, systemic chemotherapy used chiefly for treating high grade glioma. Due to the rising costs of systemic chemotherapy, many jurisdictions have replaced brand-name with generic formulations. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not there was difference in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 bone marrow toxicity and median overall survival in patients treated with brand-name vs generic TMZ in the province of Alberta, Canada. The province suspended use of generic TMZ based on preliminary data pointing to excess toxicity. Methods This multicenter, retrospective study included data from patients with newly diagnosed high grade glioma that received treatment with TMZ in Alberta. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine association between grade 3 or 4 toxicity to generic vs. brand-name TMZ exposure, ECOG score and age. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank testing were used to determine differences in overall survival between the brand-name and generic TMZ cohorts, as well as the cytopenic vs non-cytopenic patients. Furthermore, a screening analysis for grade 3 or 4 bone marrow toxicity was conducted on all de novo glioma patients treated with brand-name TMZ after Alberta preemptively stopped generic TMZ. Results Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 15% and 19% of patients treated with generic TMZ (n=156) as compared to 3% and 5% of patients (n=100) treated with brand-name TMZ treated patients; p= 0.003 and 0.001. A trend towards increased median overall survival in GBM patients treated with generic TMZ (13.7 months) versus brand-name (15.8 months, p = 0.178.) was also observed though meeting statistical significance. Based on these results, the province stopped the use of generic TMZ and reverted to the Merck TMZ. An initial review of all new glioma patients (n= 89) treated with Merck TMZ since the province stopped generic drug demonstrated 3.4% and 10.1% grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, and respectively. Conclusions The statistically significant difference in toxicity profile has prompted the province of Alberta to replace generic TMZ for brand-name TMZ in high grade glioma patients pending more detailed analysis. Our study provides evidence supporting the importance of conducting prospective studies on long-term safety for generic chemotherapies.","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Background Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral, systemic chemotherapy used chiefly for treating high grade glioma. Due to the rising costs of systemic chemotherapy, many jurisdictions have replaced brand-name with generic formulations. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not there was difference in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 bone marrow toxicity and median overall survival in patients treated with brand-name vs generic TMZ in the province of Alberta, Canada. The province suspended use of generic TMZ based on preliminary data pointing to excess toxicity. Methods This multicenter, retrospective study included data from patients with newly diagnosed high grade glioma that received treatment with TMZ in Alberta. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine association between grade 3 or 4 toxicity to generic vs. brand-name TMZ exposure, ECOG score and age. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank testing were used to determine differences in overall survival between the brand-name and generic TMZ cohorts, as well as the cytopenic vs non-cytopenic patients. Furthermore, a screening analysis for grade 3 or 4 bone marrow toxicity was conducted on all de novo glioma patients treated with brand-name TMZ after Alberta preemptively stopped generic TMZ. Results Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 15% and 19% of patients treated with generic TMZ (n=156) as compared to 3% and 5% of patients (n=100) treated with brand-name TMZ treated patients; p= 0.003 and 0.001. A trend towards increased median overall survival in GBM patients treated with generic TMZ (13.7 months) versus brand-name (15.8 months, p = 0.178.) was also observed though meeting statistical significance. Based on these results, the province stopped the use of generic TMZ and reverted to the Merck TMZ. An initial review of all new glioma patients (n= 89) treated with Merck TMZ since the province stopped generic drug demonstrated 3.4% and 10.1% grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, and respectively. Conclusions The statistically significant difference in toxicity profile has prompted the province of Alberta to replace generic TMZ for brand-name TMZ in high grade glioma patients pending more detailed analysis. Our study provides evidence supporting the importance of conducting prospective studies on long-term safety for generic chemotherapies.
期刊介绍:
Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving