Evaluating the Pretoria Agreement: the limitations of presentist analysis of conflicts in Ethiopia

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Review of African Political Economy Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/03056244.2023.2270871
Jon Abbink
{"title":"Evaluating the Pretoria Agreement: the limitations of presentist analysis of conflicts in Ethiopia","authors":"Jon Abbink","doi":"10.1080/03056244.2023.2270871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARYThis debate piece contains an assessment of the debate on the ‘Pretoria Agreement’ (or Cessation of Hostilities Agreement) concluded on 2 November 2022 regarding the armed conflict in Ethiopia. On the basis of a critical discussion of a paper by F. Gebresenbet and Y. Tariku (2023) published in the Spring issue of the Review of African Political Economy (ROAPE), the author here contests the short-term analysis of the authors, who miss essential points of the wider context of political conflict in Ethiopia and also scholastically misrepresent some other authors in the debate.KEYWORDS: African politicsEthiopiaarmed conflictethno-political tensions Disclosure statementThe author declares no conflict of interest.Notes1 Like the excellent piece by Fitz-Gerald and Segal (Citation2023).2 Already widely known since 2021: see www.worldmedias.net/horn-of-africa-tplf-sympathizers-use-infiltrators-for-its-destabilizing-propaganda-action/. Examples are the systematic TPLF statements on ‘food aid blockade’ and ‘man-made famine’ in Tigray (disproved by the World Food Programme Ethiopia (see Omamo Citation2022); and the ‘Tigray genocide’ meme (disproved by UN-Equality and Human Rights Commission research) and post-war reporting. See also Sheba and Pearce (Citation2022). All this does not mean that Tigray’s population did not gravely suffer in the war (like those of Afar and Amhara regions).3 And the federal government in 2020 seems to have other priorities, like building huge new government palaces; compare Hochet-Bodin Citation2023. In fact, the economy is in dire straits: see www.africaintelligence.com/eastern-africa-and-the-horn/2023/04/11/abiy-ahmed-s-loyal-allies-tasked-with-keeping-the-money-coming,109933716-eve?cxt=PUB&utm_source=AIA&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=AUTO_EDIT_SOM&did=1747468.4 Still in March 2023, a faction of the TPLF led by top cadres/military leaders like Migbe Haile, Getachew Aseffa, Abraha Tesfay and others was holding out and is in a state of armed vigilance (see https://twitter.com/jbirru/status/1635480052186873857). Other TPLF leaders, some of them now in the ‘interim government’ in Tigray, prevaricate on the Pretoria Agreement.5 In this agreement between the ‘senior commanders’ of both the federal army and the TPLF armed forces, it seemed that TPLF disarmament was conditioned on withdrawal of ‘non-ENDF’ forces from the war areas – highly contested.6 A new scandal erupted in June 2023, when it was revealed the massive quantities of humanitarian aid in Tigray were stolen or disappeared – allegedly under TPLF auspices. The entire WFP leadership resigned (https://abren.org/ethiopia-wfp-controversy-leads-to-resignations/). This continued a pattern of food aid theft and diversion by TPLF during the 2020–2022 war (www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Elelx4QLHQ; www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9SjilttgYk&t=3s).7 For the complexity of the issue, see www.hornafricainsight.org/post/welkait-ethiopia-geo-strategic-importance-and-the-consequential-annexation-by-tplf. See also the research-based heavy indictments in Geta Asrade et al. (Citation2022).8 The CoHA in Art. 10.4 announces to resolve this ‘in accordance with the Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia’ (see AU Citation2022), but that will not be smooth because this TPLF-made and imposed constitution of 1994 (adopted three years after the TPLF’s unilateral annexation of the Wolqait area) did not have majority support and is in itself highly contested. A ‘constitutional solution’ without assessing the historical facts and the interventionist TPLF policies of the last three to four decades (including demographic engineering) in this region will not bring stability.9 ‘Exclusive: Ethiopians Suffer Horrific Burns in Suspected White Phosphorus Attacks’, in the Daily Telegraph, 23 May 2021.10 See https://twitter.com/Eyob_Belachew33/status/1569760736515088384. Examples of lies could be multiplied. Countering them matters.11 With the massive attack on sleeping, unarmed (non-Tigrayan) soldiers of the federal army in camps in Tigray. See the shocking eyewitness-survivor account of Gashaye T’enaw (Citation2022).12 Remarkable is, for instance, the start of a digital media campaign by pro-TPLF activists entitled ‘Tigray genocide’ – on the first day of the conflict – even before the federal army had counter-attacked (see Abren.org, https://abren.org/premeditated-tigray-genocide-cyber-warfare-in-the-age-of-social-media/). The ‘genocide’ lie was perpetuated throughout the conflict but was later demonstrated to be entirely false.13 There were many more, doing great damage, but they are conveniently not mentioned by Fana and Yonas.14 For instance, www.ascleiden.nl/sites/default/files/j.abbink_working_paper_152_18-10-2021_final.pdf; https://www.e-ir.info/2021/11/21/the-ethiopia-conflict-in-international-relations-and-global-media-discourse/); https://theglobalobservatory.org/2021/01/tigray-conflict-ethiopia-ramifications-international-response/); or https://canopyforum.org/2022/10/26/has-religion-been-fueling-the-politics-of-conflict-in-ethiopia-a-cautionary-tale/.15 According to data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) project, armed conflict overall has declined since November 2022 but has also shifted from the Tigray area to Amhara and Oromia Regions: see https://epo.acleddata.com/2023/05/06/epo-april-2023-monthly-volatility-in-amhara-region-while-the-rest-of-the-country-stabilizes/; https://epo.acleddata.com/2023/04/05/epo-march-2023-monthly-political-violence-trends-decline-amid-opportunities-for-peace/; and https://epo.acleddata.com/2023/06/01/epo-weekly-20-26-may-2023/. Since May 2023 the federal army has engaged in a one-sided and politically ill-advised ‘disarmament’ campaign in the Amhara Region, which has provoked massive popular resistance.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJon AbbinkJon Abbink is a political anthropologist/historian and professor in political anthropology (focus on politics and governance) of Africa at the African Studies Centre, Leiden University, the Netherlands. He has carried out research on the history, politics and cultures of Northeast Africa, in particular Ethiopia, and published regularly on these subjects in international journals and books. A recent paper on Ethiopian history and history writing appeared in 2022 in Cahiers d’Études Africaines.","PeriodicalId":47526,"journal":{"name":"Review of African Political Economy","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of African Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2023.2270871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

SUMMARYThis debate piece contains an assessment of the debate on the ‘Pretoria Agreement’ (or Cessation of Hostilities Agreement) concluded on 2 November 2022 regarding the armed conflict in Ethiopia. On the basis of a critical discussion of a paper by F. Gebresenbet and Y. Tariku (2023) published in the Spring issue of the Review of African Political Economy (ROAPE), the author here contests the short-term analysis of the authors, who miss essential points of the wider context of political conflict in Ethiopia and also scholastically misrepresent some other authors in the debate.KEYWORDS: African politicsEthiopiaarmed conflictethno-political tensions Disclosure statementThe author declares no conflict of interest.Notes1 Like the excellent piece by Fitz-Gerald and Segal (Citation2023).2 Already widely known since 2021: see www.worldmedias.net/horn-of-africa-tplf-sympathizers-use-infiltrators-for-its-destabilizing-propaganda-action/. Examples are the systematic TPLF statements on ‘food aid blockade’ and ‘man-made famine’ in Tigray (disproved by the World Food Programme Ethiopia (see Omamo Citation2022); and the ‘Tigray genocide’ meme (disproved by UN-Equality and Human Rights Commission research) and post-war reporting. See also Sheba and Pearce (Citation2022). All this does not mean that Tigray’s population did not gravely suffer in the war (like those of Afar and Amhara regions).3 And the federal government in 2020 seems to have other priorities, like building huge new government palaces; compare Hochet-Bodin Citation2023. In fact, the economy is in dire straits: see www.africaintelligence.com/eastern-africa-and-the-horn/2023/04/11/abiy-ahmed-s-loyal-allies-tasked-with-keeping-the-money-coming,109933716-eve?cxt=PUB&utm_source=AIA&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=AUTO_EDIT_SOM&did=1747468.4 Still in March 2023, a faction of the TPLF led by top cadres/military leaders like Migbe Haile, Getachew Aseffa, Abraha Tesfay and others was holding out and is in a state of armed vigilance (see https://twitter.com/jbirru/status/1635480052186873857). Other TPLF leaders, some of them now in the ‘interim government’ in Tigray, prevaricate on the Pretoria Agreement.5 In this agreement between the ‘senior commanders’ of both the federal army and the TPLF armed forces, it seemed that TPLF disarmament was conditioned on withdrawal of ‘non-ENDF’ forces from the war areas – highly contested.6 A new scandal erupted in June 2023, when it was revealed the massive quantities of humanitarian aid in Tigray were stolen or disappeared – allegedly under TPLF auspices. The entire WFP leadership resigned (https://abren.org/ethiopia-wfp-controversy-leads-to-resignations/). This continued a pattern of food aid theft and diversion by TPLF during the 2020–2022 war (www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Elelx4QLHQ; www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9SjilttgYk&t=3s).7 For the complexity of the issue, see www.hornafricainsight.org/post/welkait-ethiopia-geo-strategic-importance-and-the-consequential-annexation-by-tplf. See also the research-based heavy indictments in Geta Asrade et al. (Citation2022).8 The CoHA in Art. 10.4 announces to resolve this ‘in accordance with the Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia’ (see AU Citation2022), but that will not be smooth because this TPLF-made and imposed constitution of 1994 (adopted three years after the TPLF’s unilateral annexation of the Wolqait area) did not have majority support and is in itself highly contested. A ‘constitutional solution’ without assessing the historical facts and the interventionist TPLF policies of the last three to four decades (including demographic engineering) in this region will not bring stability.9 ‘Exclusive: Ethiopians Suffer Horrific Burns in Suspected White Phosphorus Attacks’, in the Daily Telegraph, 23 May 2021.10 See https://twitter.com/Eyob_Belachew33/status/1569760736515088384. Examples of lies could be multiplied. Countering them matters.11 With the massive attack on sleeping, unarmed (non-Tigrayan) soldiers of the federal army in camps in Tigray. See the shocking eyewitness-survivor account of Gashaye T’enaw (Citation2022).12 Remarkable is, for instance, the start of a digital media campaign by pro-TPLF activists entitled ‘Tigray genocide’ – on the first day of the conflict – even before the federal army had counter-attacked (see Abren.org, https://abren.org/premeditated-tigray-genocide-cyber-warfare-in-the-age-of-social-media/). The ‘genocide’ lie was perpetuated throughout the conflict but was later demonstrated to be entirely false.13 There were many more, doing great damage, but they are conveniently not mentioned by Fana and Yonas.14 For instance, www.ascleiden.nl/sites/default/files/j.abbink_working_paper_152_18-10-2021_final.pdf; https://www.e-ir.info/2021/11/21/the-ethiopia-conflict-in-international-relations-and-global-media-discourse/); https://theglobalobservatory.org/2021/01/tigray-conflict-ethiopia-ramifications-international-response/); or https://canopyforum.org/2022/10/26/has-religion-been-fueling-the-politics-of-conflict-in-ethiopia-a-cautionary-tale/.15 According to data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) project, armed conflict overall has declined since November 2022 but has also shifted from the Tigray area to Amhara and Oromia Regions: see https://epo.acleddata.com/2023/05/06/epo-april-2023-monthly-volatility-in-amhara-region-while-the-rest-of-the-country-stabilizes/; https://epo.acleddata.com/2023/04/05/epo-march-2023-monthly-political-violence-trends-decline-amid-opportunities-for-peace/; and https://epo.acleddata.com/2023/06/01/epo-weekly-20-26-may-2023/. Since May 2023 the federal army has engaged in a one-sided and politically ill-advised ‘disarmament’ campaign in the Amhara Region, which has provoked massive popular resistance.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJon AbbinkJon Abbink is a political anthropologist/historian and professor in political anthropology (focus on politics and governance) of Africa at the African Studies Centre, Leiden University, the Netherlands. He has carried out research on the history, politics and cultures of Northeast Africa, in particular Ethiopia, and published regularly on these subjects in international journals and books. A recent paper on Ethiopian history and history writing appeared in 2022 in Cahiers d’Études Africaines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价《比勒陀利亚协定》:对埃塞俄比亚境内冲突的现行分析的局限性
这篇辩论文章包括对2022年11月2日就埃塞俄比亚武装冲突达成的“比勒陀利亚协议”(或停止敌对行动协议)辩论的评估。在对F. Gebresenbet和Y. Tariku(2023)发表在《非洲政治经济学评论》(ROAPE)春季刊上的一篇论文进行批判性讨论的基础上,作者在这里对作者的短期分析提出质疑,他们错过了埃塞俄比亚政治冲突更广泛背景的要点,并且在学术上歪曲了辩论中的其他一些作者。关键词:非洲政治;埃塞俄比亚武装冲突;民族政治紧张局势;注1:就像Fitz-Gerald和Segal的那篇优秀的文章(Citation2023)自2021年以来已经广为人知:参见www.worldmedias.net/horn-of-africa-tplf-sympathizers-use-infiltrators-for-its-destabilizing-propaganda-action/。例如,TPLF关于提格雷“粮食援助封锁”和“人为饥荒”的系统性声明(被世界粮食计划署埃塞俄比亚反驳(见Omamo Citation2022);“提格雷种族灭绝”梗(被联合国平等和人权委员会的研究证明是错误的)和战后报告。参见示巴和皮尔斯(Citation2022)。所有这一切并不意味着提格雷的人民没有在战争中遭受严重的苦难(就像阿法尔和阿姆哈拉地区的人民一样)2020年的联邦政府似乎还有其他优先事项,比如建造巨大的新政府宫殿;比较Hochet-Bodin Citation2023。事实上,经济正处于水深火热之中。见www.africaintelligence.com/eastern-africa-and-the-horn/2023/04/11/abiy-ahmed-s-loyal-allies-tasked-with-keeping-the-money-coming, 109933716——夏娃? cxt = PUB&utm_source = AIA&utm_medium = email&utm_campaign = AUTO_EDIT_SOM&did = 1747468.4还是2023年3月,’的一个派系,该制度由干部/高级军事领导人像Migbe海丽,Getachew Aseffa, Abraha Tesfay和其他人被坚持和武装警戒状态(见https://twitter.com/jbirru/status/1635480052186873857)。TPLF的其他领导人,其中一些人现在在提格雷的“临时政府”中,对《比勒陀利亚协定》推诿搪塞。5在联邦军队和TPLF武装部队的“高级指挥官”之间的这项协定中,似乎TPLF的解除武装是以“非endf”部队撤出战区为条件的,这是高度争议的2023年6月爆发了一场新的丑闻,据披露,提格雷大量人道主义援助物资被盗或失踪——据称是在TPLF的支持下。粮食计划署全体领导层辞职(https://abren.org/ethiopia-wfp-controversy-leads-to-resignations/)。这延续了TPLF在2020-2022年战争期间盗窃和转移粮食援助的模式(www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Elelx4QLHQ;www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9SjilttgYk&t=3s).7问题的复杂程度请参见www.hornafricainsight.org/post/welkait-ethiopia-geo-strategic-importance-and-the-consequential-annexation-by-tplf。参见Geta Asrade等人的基于研究的重诉(Citation2022)CoHA在第10.4条中宣布“根据埃塞俄比亚联邦民主共和国宪法”解决这一问题(见AU Citation2022),但这并不顺利,因为1994年TPLF制定并实施的宪法(在TPLF单方面吞并Wolqait地区三年后通过)没有得到大多数人的支持,而且本身就存在很大争议。不考虑历史事实和过去三、四十年TPLF的干预政策(包括人口工程)的“宪法解决方案”不会给该地区带来稳定。9“独家报道:埃塞俄比亚人遭受疑似白磷袭击的可怕烧伤”,《每日电讯报》,2012.1年5月23日,见https://twitter.com/Eyob_Belachew33/status/1569760736515088384。谎言的例子还有很多。对付他们很重要在提格雷的营地里,联邦军队的手无寸铁的(非提格雷人)士兵在睡觉时遭到大规模袭击。参见Gashaye T 'enaw令人震惊的目击者幸存者描述(Citation2022)例如,值得注意的是,在冲突的第一天,甚至在联邦军队反击之前,支持tplf的活动人士就开始了一场名为“Tigray种族灭绝”的数字媒体运动(见Abren.org, https://abren.org/premeditated-tigray-genocide-cyber-warfare-in-the-age-of-social-media/)。“种族灭绝”的谎言在整个冲突中一直存在,但后来被证明是完全错误的还有更多的,造成了巨大的破坏,但他们很方便地没有被法娜和约纳斯提到。https://www.e-ir.info/2021/11/21/the-ethiopia-conflict-in-international-relations-and-global-media-discourse/);https://theglobalobservatory。 org/2021/01/tigray-conflict-ethiopia-ramifications-international-response/);或https://canopyforum.org/2022/10/26/has-religion-been-fueling-the-politics-of-conflict-in-ethiopia-a-cautionary-tale/.15根据武装冲突地点和事件数据(ACLED)项目的数据,自2022年11月以来,武装冲突总体上有所下降,但也从提格雷地区转移到阿姆哈拉和奥罗米亚地区:见https://epo.acleddata.com/2023/05/06/epo-april-2023-monthly-volatility-in-amhara-region-while-the-rest-of-the-country-stabilizes/;https://epo.acleddata.com/2023/04/05/epo - 3月- 2023年-月-政治暴力趋势下降-在-机会——peace/;和https://epo.acleddata.com/2023/06/01/epo-weekly-20-26-may-2023/。自2023年5月以来,联邦军队在阿姆哈拉地区进行了一场片面的、政治上不明智的“解除武装”运动,引发了大规模的民众抵抗。作者简介jon Abbink是荷兰莱顿大学非洲研究中心的政治人类学家/历史学家和非洲政治人类学(专注于政治和治理)教授。他对东北非洲,特别是埃塞俄比亚的历史、政治和文化进行了研究,并定期在国际期刊和书籍上发表有关这些主题的文章。最近一篇关于埃塞俄比亚历史和历史写作的论文出现在2022年的《非洲人手册》(Cahiers d ' Études Africaines)上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Review of African Political Economy (ROAPE) is a refereed journal committed to encouraging high quality research and fostering excellence in the understanding of African political economy. Published quarterly by Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group for the ROAPE international collective it has since 1974 provided radical analysis of trends and issues in Africa. It has paid particular attention to the political economy of inequality, exploitation and oppression, whether driven by global forces or local ones (such as class, race, community and gender), and to materialist interpretations of change in Africa. It has sustained a critical analysis of the nature of power and the state in Africa.
期刊最新文献
Resource nationalism and energy transitions in lower-income countries: the case of Tanzania Speaking out, talking back? African feminist politics and decolonial poetics of knowing, organising and loving South Africa’s unjust climate reparations: a critique of the Just Energy Transition Partnership How capitalism is destroying the Horn of Africa: sheep and the crises in Somalia and Sudan (Un)Just transition in power generation: neoliberal reforms and climate crisis in Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1