A historical and critical review of latrine-siting guidelines

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.2166/washdev.2023.140
Christopher Nenninger, Jeffrey Cunningham, James R. Mihelcic
{"title":"A historical and critical review of latrine-siting guidelines","authors":"Christopher Nenninger, Jeffrey Cunningham, James R. Mihelcic","doi":"10.2166/washdev.2023.140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Latrines are an effective way for people in low- and middle-income countries to move away from open defecation. Guidelines are used to provide a recommended horizontal setback distance from a latrine to a downgradient well to ensure the safety of the well from subsurface contaminants. We collected 107 journal papers, books, and reports to critically review the recommended setback distances and how these recommendations are derived. It was discovered that the four most common guidelines/reviews are all based principally on just four field studies, all of which were conducted over 40 years ago, which casts doubt on a frequently used one-size-fits-all approach. More recent methods for latrine siting use both field data and some sort of modeling component to account for the different site conditions, but these models have not been verified for use outside their respective studies. They are also limited in how they consider the hydraulic connection between the latrine and the well. We recommend that future siting guidelines should focus more on vertical separation, include chemical contamination, and be based on models describing how latrines and wells are hydraulically connected, along with the fate and transport of potentially harmful contaminants.","PeriodicalId":48893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2023.140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Latrines are an effective way for people in low- and middle-income countries to move away from open defecation. Guidelines are used to provide a recommended horizontal setback distance from a latrine to a downgradient well to ensure the safety of the well from subsurface contaminants. We collected 107 journal papers, books, and reports to critically review the recommended setback distances and how these recommendations are derived. It was discovered that the four most common guidelines/reviews are all based principally on just four field studies, all of which were conducted over 40 years ago, which casts doubt on a frequently used one-size-fits-all approach. More recent methods for latrine siting use both field data and some sort of modeling component to account for the different site conditions, but these models have not been verified for use outside their respective studies. They are also limited in how they consider the hydraulic connection between the latrine and the well. We recommend that future siting guidelines should focus more on vertical separation, include chemical contamination, and be based on models describing how latrines and wells are hydraulically connected, along with the fate and transport of potentially harmful contaminants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对厕所选址指南的历史性和批判性审查
对于低收入和中等收入国家的人们来说,厕所是避免露天排便的有效途径。指南用于提供从厕所到下斜井的推荐水平后退距离,以确保井不受地下污染物的影响。我们收集了107篇期刊论文、书籍和报告,对推荐的挫折距离以及这些建议是如何得出的进行了批判性审查。人们发现,四种最常见的指导方针/评论主要都是基于四项实地研究,所有这些研究都是在40多年前进行的,这使人们对经常使用的一刀切方法产生了怀疑。最近的厕所选址方法使用实地数据和某种建模成分来解释不同的地点条件,但这些模型尚未得到验证,以便在各自的研究之外使用。他们在如何考虑厕所和井之间的水力连接方面也受到限制。我们建议未来的选址指南应该更多地关注垂直分离,包括化学污染,并基于描述厕所和井如何水力连接的模型,以及潜在有害污染物的命运和运输。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of high-quality information on the science, policy and practice of drinking-water supply, sanitation and hygiene at local, national and international levels.
期刊最新文献
Socioeconomic predictors of access to improved water sources, sanitation facilities, and household water treatment in Nigeria WASH practices increased the prevalence of malnutrition among under-five children (6–59 months) in an urban slum area in Ibadan, Nigeria Enhancing rural drinking water safety using a Mg–Al-type layered double hydroxide foil as a new point-of-use disinfection tool Occurrence of Acanthamoeba spp. in a major river in the Philippines: impact on water quality and health WASH FIT implementation in Rohingya camps in Cox's Bazar Bangladesh – results after 1 year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1