Evaluation of ovarian reserve in unexplained ınfertile cases: a case-controlled study

IF 1.6 Q4 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Middle East Fertility Society Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1186/s43043-023-00154-6
Mustafa Sahin, Suleyman Guven, Hidayet Sal, Emine Seda Guvendag Guven
{"title":"Evaluation of ovarian reserve in unexplained ınfertile cases: a case-controlled study","authors":"Mustafa Sahin, Suleyman Guven, Hidayet Sal, Emine Seda Guvendag Guven","doi":"10.1186/s43043-023-00154-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of current ovarian reserve tests in unexplained infertile cases. Material and methods This case–control study was conducted on 70 unexplained infertile women who were included in a tertiary university hospital. Both groups of basal FSH, estradiol, antimullerian hormone (AMH), inhibin B, ovarian volume, total antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian volume, and ovarian stromal blood flow (peak systolic velocity (PSV), S/D (systole and diastole ratio), resistance index (RI), and pulsatility index (PI)) values were compared. Results The mean AMH, inhibin B, PSV, and stromal blood flow values of the control group patients were higher than those in the unexplained infertility group. However, the values of the means of RI and PI of the cases in the control group were lower than those in the infertility group. When PI’s value was ≥ 2.00, its sensitivity was 65.7%, and its specificity was 64.3%. In the case of the RI, its value was ≥ 0.745, its sensitivity was 65.7%, and its specificity was 62.9%. In order to show ovarian reserve in unexplained infertile cases, the sensitivity values can be sorted from high to low as follows: PI > RI > estradiol > FSH > ovarian volume > AFC > inhibin B > stromal blood flow > PSV > S/D. Conclusion In the unexplained infertile patient group with normal ovarian reserve test results, basal estradiol, decreased PI, and RI values may be used as good ovarian reserve predictors.","PeriodicalId":18532,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Fertility Society Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Fertility Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00154-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of current ovarian reserve tests in unexplained infertile cases. Material and methods This case–control study was conducted on 70 unexplained infertile women who were included in a tertiary university hospital. Both groups of basal FSH, estradiol, antimullerian hormone (AMH), inhibin B, ovarian volume, total antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian volume, and ovarian stromal blood flow (peak systolic velocity (PSV), S/D (systole and diastole ratio), resistance index (RI), and pulsatility index (PI)) values were compared. Results The mean AMH, inhibin B, PSV, and stromal blood flow values of the control group patients were higher than those in the unexplained infertility group. However, the values of the means of RI and PI of the cases in the control group were lower than those in the infertility group. When PI’s value was ≥ 2.00, its sensitivity was 65.7%, and its specificity was 64.3%. In the case of the RI, its value was ≥ 0.745, its sensitivity was 65.7%, and its specificity was 62.9%. In order to show ovarian reserve in unexplained infertile cases, the sensitivity values can be sorted from high to low as follows: PI > RI > estradiol > FSH > ovarian volume > AFC > inhibin B > stromal blood flow > PSV > S/D. Conclusion In the unexplained infertile patient group with normal ovarian reserve test results, basal estradiol, decreased PI, and RI values may be used as good ovarian reserve predictors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不明原因ınfertile病例评估卵巢储备:一项病例对照研究
摘要背景本研究的目的是评价目前卵巢储备检测在不明原因不孕症中的有效性。材料与方法本病例对照研究纳入某三级大学附属医院的70例不明原因不孕症妇女。比较两组患者基础FSH、雌二醇、抗苗勒管激素(AMH)、抑制素B、卵巢体积、总心房卵泡计数(AFC)、卵巢体积、卵巢间质血流(峰值收缩速度(PSV)、S/D(收缩舒张比)、阻力指数(RI)、搏动指数(PI))值。结果对照组患者AMH、抑制素B、PSV、间质血流量平均值均高于不明原因不孕组。而对照组患者的RI均值和PI均值均低于不孕症组。当PI值≥2.00时,其敏感性为65.7%,特异性为64.3%。RI的值≥0.745,敏感性为65.7%,特异性为62.9%。为显示不明原因不孕症患者卵巢储备情况,敏感性值可由高到低排序如下:PI >国际扶轮的在雌二醇在FSH在卵巢体积>亚足联祝辞抑制素B >基质血流量>埃因霍温祝辞S / D。结论在卵巢储备试验结果正常的不明原因不孕症患者组中,基础雌二醇、PI下降、RI值可作为卵巢储备的良好预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effectiveness and adverse effects of oral versus transdermal estradiol for endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial The effect of vitamin D on the hormonal profile of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Semen in the time of COVID-19: a narrative review of current evidence and implications for fertility and reproductive health From uncertain to certain—how to proceed with variants of uncertain significance The efficacy of luteal phase support in women with polycystic ovary syndrome following assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1