Mette Lund Kristensen, Ingo Winkler, Elke Weik, Richard Mee, Simon Jebsen
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue","authors":"Mette Lund Kristensen, Ingo Winkler, Elke Weik, Richard Mee, Simon Jebsen","doi":"10.3167/latiss.2023.160201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Special Issue emerged as a reaction to changes in the organisation of academic work that authors variously refer to as the managerial university (e.g., Laiho et al. 2022; Lea 2011), the McUniversity (e.g., Nadolny and Ryan 2015; Parker and Jary 1995), the neoliberal university (e.g., Davies et al. 2006), the corporate university (e.g., Angus 2007) or the entrepreneurial university (e.g., Marginson and Considine 2000; Slaughter and Leslie 1997). Following the neoliberal idea of a smaller state and more market in conjunction with New Public Management ideology, universities are increasingly managed along the lines of marketisation, hierarchising, measurement, auditing and control. In that regard it is powerful external stakeholders (e.g., politicians, industry, media, general public) and internal stakeholders (e.g., management and administration) rather than academics that debate and decide the legitimacy of higher education or make various claims about the purposes and the preferred outcomes of academic work (Weik et al. 2022). At the same time, the perspective on academic work has shifted from a validation and certification by peers (Huff 2000) towards a validation focusing on the practical usability of academic knowledge production (Grey 2001; Gulati 2007; Learmonth et al. 2012).","PeriodicalId":43112,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Teaching-The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences","volume":"25 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Teaching-The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2023.160201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This Special Issue emerged as a reaction to changes in the organisation of academic work that authors variously refer to as the managerial university (e.g., Laiho et al. 2022; Lea 2011), the McUniversity (e.g., Nadolny and Ryan 2015; Parker and Jary 1995), the neoliberal university (e.g., Davies et al. 2006), the corporate university (e.g., Angus 2007) or the entrepreneurial university (e.g., Marginson and Considine 2000; Slaughter and Leslie 1997). Following the neoliberal idea of a smaller state and more market in conjunction with New Public Management ideology, universities are increasingly managed along the lines of marketisation, hierarchising, measurement, auditing and control. In that regard it is powerful external stakeholders (e.g., politicians, industry, media, general public) and internal stakeholders (e.g., management and administration) rather than academics that debate and decide the legitimacy of higher education or make various claims about the purposes and the preferred outcomes of academic work (Weik et al. 2022). At the same time, the perspective on academic work has shifted from a validation and certification by peers (Huff 2000) towards a validation focusing on the practical usability of academic knowledge production (Grey 2001; Gulati 2007; Learmonth et al. 2012).
本期特刊的出现是对学术工作组织变化的反应,作者将其不同地称为管理大学(例如,Laiho等人,2022;Lea 2011), McUniversity(例如,Nadolny和Ryan 2015;Parker and Jary 1995),新自由主义大学(例如,Davies et al. 2006),企业大学(例如,Angus 2007)或创业大学(例如,Marginson and Considine 2000;Slaughter and Leslie 1997)。随着新自由主义关于更小的国家和更多的市场的思想与新公共管理思想相结合,大学越来越多地按照市场化、等级化、衡量、审计和控制的方式进行管理。在这方面,是强大的外部利益相关者(如政治家、行业、媒体、公众)和内部利益相关者(如管理层和行政部门)辩论和决定高等教育的合法性,或对学术工作的目的和优选结果提出各种主张的学者(Weik et al. 2022)。与此同时,对学术工作的看法已经从同行的验证和认证(Huff 2000)转向了对学术知识生产的实际可用性的验证(Grey 2001;Gulati 2007;Learmonth et al. 2012)。