Prevalence of Coagulopathy in Patients with Celiac Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Case-Control Study

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Insights Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.3390/gastroent14040034
{"title":"Prevalence of Coagulopathy in Patients with Celiac Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Case-Control Study","authors":"Daniel Vasile Balaban, Laura Ioana Coman, Iulia Cristina Enache, Cristian Mihail Mardan, Alina Dima, Ciprian Jurcuț, Marina Balaban, Raluca Simona Costache, Florentina Ioniță-Radu, Alina Popp, Mariana Jinga","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Despite being one of the most frequent chronic digestive diseases worldwide, with a prevalence of 1%, celiac disease (CD) remains severely underdiagnosed. Among the instruments used to improve its diagnostic rate, hematologic parameters have been proposed as screening tests to select patients with an increased probability of having CD. Assessment of coagulation is included in routine check-ups, and CD has been reported to be associated with coagulopathy. We aimed to assess if subtle changes in coagulation tests could be used in clinical practice to prompt testing for CD. Methods: We retrospectively recruited all patients with clinical suspicion for CD during a study period of 7 years (between 2015 and 2022), who were tested using IgA tissue transglutaminase (tTG) serology and serum total IgA (IgG tTG in case of IgA deficiency) and who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with multiple biopsy sampling of the duodenal bulb and distal duodenum. We stratified patients into three groups: newly diagnosed CD, gluten-free diet-treated CD, and non-CD controls. Results: Altogether, there were 133 CD patients (71 newly diagnosed, 62 GFD-treated) and 57 non-CD controls. Mean age and gender distribution were similar among the three groups: 43.3 years for newly diagnosed CD, 41.6 years for non-CD controls, and 44 years for GFD-treated CD patients, with a male gender distribution of 21.1%, 28%, and 24.1%, respectively. Among the included newly diagnosed CD patients, 14% had a prolonged INR. The mean INR was slightly higher in newly diagnosed CD patients, compared to GFD-treated CD patients and non-CD controls: 1.12 ± 0.30, 1.02 ± 0.83, and 1.00 ± 0.08, respectively (p = 0.009). Consequently, prothrombin activity was slightly lower in newly diagnosed CD patients, compared to GFD-treated CD and non-CD controls: 94.9 ± 19.3%, 102.3 ± 12.8%, and 101.9 ± 15.15, respectively. Interestingly, after GFD, the mean INR and prothrombin activity of CD individuals reached a value similar to that of non-CD controls. Conclusions: Subtle changes in INR, defined as a value within the normal range, but closer to the upper limit, could be an indicator of probability for CD.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite being one of the most frequent chronic digestive diseases worldwide, with a prevalence of 1%, celiac disease (CD) remains severely underdiagnosed. Among the instruments used to improve its diagnostic rate, hematologic parameters have been proposed as screening tests to select patients with an increased probability of having CD. Assessment of coagulation is included in routine check-ups, and CD has been reported to be associated with coagulopathy. We aimed to assess if subtle changes in coagulation tests could be used in clinical practice to prompt testing for CD. Methods: We retrospectively recruited all patients with clinical suspicion for CD during a study period of 7 years (between 2015 and 2022), who were tested using IgA tissue transglutaminase (tTG) serology and serum total IgA (IgG tTG in case of IgA deficiency) and who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with multiple biopsy sampling of the duodenal bulb and distal duodenum. We stratified patients into three groups: newly diagnosed CD, gluten-free diet-treated CD, and non-CD controls. Results: Altogether, there were 133 CD patients (71 newly diagnosed, 62 GFD-treated) and 57 non-CD controls. Mean age and gender distribution were similar among the three groups: 43.3 years for newly diagnosed CD, 41.6 years for non-CD controls, and 44 years for GFD-treated CD patients, with a male gender distribution of 21.1%, 28%, and 24.1%, respectively. Among the included newly diagnosed CD patients, 14% had a prolonged INR. The mean INR was slightly higher in newly diagnosed CD patients, compared to GFD-treated CD patients and non-CD controls: 1.12 ± 0.30, 1.02 ± 0.83, and 1.00 ± 0.08, respectively (p = 0.009). Consequently, prothrombin activity was slightly lower in newly diagnosed CD patients, compared to GFD-treated CD and non-CD controls: 94.9 ± 19.3%, 102.3 ± 12.8%, and 101.9 ± 15.15, respectively. Interestingly, after GFD, the mean INR and prothrombin activity of CD individuals reached a value similar to that of non-CD controls. Conclusions: Subtle changes in INR, defined as a value within the normal range, but closer to the upper limit, could be an indicator of probability for CD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳糜泻患者凝血功能障碍的患病率:一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究
导读:尽管乳糜泻(CD)是世界上最常见的慢性消化系统疾病之一,患病率为1%,但乳糜泻(CD)仍然严重未被诊断。在用于提高其诊断率的仪器中,血液学参数已被提议作为筛查试验,以选择患有CD的可能性增加的患者。凝血评估包括在常规检查中,并且有报道称CD与凝血病有关。我们的目的是评估凝血试验的细微变化是否可以用于临床实践,以提示对CD的检测。我们回顾性招募了在7年的研究期间(2015年至2022年)所有临床怀疑患有CD的患者,他们使用IgA组织转谷氨酰胺酶(tTG)血清学和血清总IgA (IgA缺乏时IgG tTG)进行检测,并接受上消化道内镜检查,对十二指肠球和十二指肠远端进行多次活检取样。我们将患者分为三组:新诊断的乳糜泻,无谷蛋白饮食治疗的乳糜泻和非乳糜泻对照组。结果:共有133例CD患者(71例新诊断,62例gfd治疗)和57例非CD对照组。三组患者的平均年龄和性别分布相似:新诊断的乳糜泻患者为43.3岁,非乳糜泻对照组为41.6岁,gfd治疗的乳糜泻患者为44岁,男性性别分布分别为21.1%、28%和24.1%。在纳入的新诊断的乳糜泻患者中,14%的患者INR延长。与gd治疗的CD患者和非CD对照组相比,新诊断的CD患者的平均INR略高:分别为1.12±0.30,1.02±0.83和1.00±0.08 (p = 0.009)。因此,与gfd治疗的CD和非CD对照组相比,新诊断的CD患者凝血酶原活性略低:分别为94.9±19.3%,102.3±12.8%和101.9±15.15%。有趣的是,在GFD后,CD个体的平均INR和凝血酶原活性达到了与非CD对照组相似的值。结论:INR的细微变化,定义为在正常范围内,但更接近上限的值,可以作为CD概率的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates in Patients with Hepatic Coagulopathy: A Single Center Retrospective Study
IF 4.5 2区 医学Transfusion Medicine ReviewsPub Date : 2014-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.04.003
Guillaume Richard-Carpentier , Normand Blais , Benjamin Rioux-Massé
Tu1385 Celiac Disease Prevalence Is Not Increased in Patients With Dyspepsia: A Case-Control Study
IF 29.4 1区 医学GastroenterologyPub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5085(16)33010-4
J. Lasa, L. Spallone, C. Cadiz, E. Chaar, Claudia M. Buenavida, N. Gallo, S. Berman, D. Zagalsky
Prevalence of celiac disease in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a single-center cross-sectional cohort study.
IF 2 4区 医学Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and NutritionPub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.24-39
Yuki Nishimoto, Naoko Hashimoto, Nozomi Kido, Aya Irahara, Takehito Takeuchi, Michinori Takabe, Shunji Ishihara, Yoshikazu Kinoshita, Takeshi Ohara
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Insights
Gastroenterology Insights GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correlation between Interleukin-17, High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Pepsinogen in Helicobacter pylori Infected Gastritis Elevated Incidence and Risk of Emergent Cirrhosis Complications in Alcoholic Cirrhosis Compared with Other Etiologies Insights into the Characteristics and Functions of Mast Cells in the Gut Terlipressin for the Prevention and Treatment of Renal Decline in Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Drug Profile. Microbiome and Genetic Factors in the Pathogenesis of Liver Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1