{"title":"Al-Shaʿrānī’s Defence of Ibn ʿArabī in Context: Interpreting ‘the Oneness of Existence’ (waḥdat al-wujūd) as Experiential Oneness","authors":"Haruka Cheifetz","doi":"10.1163/22105956-bja10033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The sixteenth-century Egyptian scholar ʿAbd al-Wahhāb al-Shaʿrānī was a prominent Shāfiʿī jurist of his time as well as an ardent supporter of Ibn ʿArabī; he played an important role in popularising Ibn ʿArabī’s teaching, which were then considered highly controversial. However, in current scholarship, al-Shaʿrānī’s defence of Ibn ʿArabī’s work is often dismissed as arbitrary and inconsistent. The present study seeks to challenge this negative, albeit unanimous, view of al-Shaʿrānī’s work, by demonstrating that his reading of Ibn ʿArabī is in fact founded upon a carefully thought-out methodology. By detailing the views of both pro- and anti-Ibn ʿArabī scholars, I first shed light on the classification of mystics that these scholars shared in common: heretical proponents of the oneness of existence ( waḥdat al-wujūd ) and legitimate advocates of the oneness of witnessing ( waḥdat al-shuhūd ) – which I describe in the study as ‘experiential oneness’. Secondly, by referring to al-Shaʿrānī’s hitherto unstudied texts, I discuss how he adapted the same framework of categorising the mystics with the aim of defending Ibn ʿArabī. I demonstrate how al-Shaʿrānī interpreted the ontological doctrine of the oneness of existence as a psychological, perceptual state of experiential oneness, thereby promoting Ibn ʿArabī as an exponent of experiential oneness. Furthermore, I argue that by building upon this reading method of experiential oneness, al-Shaʿrānī recontextualised some of Ibn ʿArabī’s famous tenets, such as divine self-manifestation ( tajallī ) and anthropomorphism ( tashbīh ). By doing so, al-Shaʿrānī combined Ibn ʿArabī’s teachings with his own mystical worldview, which is based on experiential oneness. I conclude that al-Shaʿrānī’s approach to Ibn ʿArabī was fittingly formulated against the intellectual trends of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century Egypt, and that al-Shaʿrānī was an innovative and unique defender of Ibn ʿArabī’s thought.","PeriodicalId":37993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sufi Studies","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sufi Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22105956-bja10033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The sixteenth-century Egyptian scholar ʿAbd al-Wahhāb al-Shaʿrānī was a prominent Shāfiʿī jurist of his time as well as an ardent supporter of Ibn ʿArabī; he played an important role in popularising Ibn ʿArabī’s teaching, which were then considered highly controversial. However, in current scholarship, al-Shaʿrānī’s defence of Ibn ʿArabī’s work is often dismissed as arbitrary and inconsistent. The present study seeks to challenge this negative, albeit unanimous, view of al-Shaʿrānī’s work, by demonstrating that his reading of Ibn ʿArabī is in fact founded upon a carefully thought-out methodology. By detailing the views of both pro- and anti-Ibn ʿArabī scholars, I first shed light on the classification of mystics that these scholars shared in common: heretical proponents of the oneness of existence ( waḥdat al-wujūd ) and legitimate advocates of the oneness of witnessing ( waḥdat al-shuhūd ) – which I describe in the study as ‘experiential oneness’. Secondly, by referring to al-Shaʿrānī’s hitherto unstudied texts, I discuss how he adapted the same framework of categorising the mystics with the aim of defending Ibn ʿArabī. I demonstrate how al-Shaʿrānī interpreted the ontological doctrine of the oneness of existence as a psychological, perceptual state of experiential oneness, thereby promoting Ibn ʿArabī as an exponent of experiential oneness. Furthermore, I argue that by building upon this reading method of experiential oneness, al-Shaʿrānī recontextualised some of Ibn ʿArabī’s famous tenets, such as divine self-manifestation ( tajallī ) and anthropomorphism ( tashbīh ). By doing so, al-Shaʿrānī combined Ibn ʿArabī’s teachings with his own mystical worldview, which is based on experiential oneness. I conclude that al-Shaʿrānī’s approach to Ibn ʿArabī was fittingly formulated against the intellectual trends of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century Egypt, and that al-Shaʿrānī was an innovative and unique defender of Ibn ʿArabī’s thought.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sufi Studies furnishes an international scholarly forum for research on Sufism. Taking an expansive view of the subject, the journal brings together all disciplinary perspectives. It publishes peer-reviewed articles and book reviews on the historical, cultural, social, philosophical, political, anthropological, literary, artistic and other aspects of Sufism in all times and places. By promoting an understanding of the richly variegated Sufi tradition in both thought and practice and in its cultural and social contexts, the Journal of Sufi Studies makes a distinctive contribution to current scholarship on Sufism and its integration into the broader field of Islamic studies.