Gifted and Talented Programs and Racial Segregation

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 ECONOMICS Education Finance and Policy Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1162/edfp_a_00415
Owen Thompson
{"title":"Gifted and Talented Programs and Racial Segregation","authors":"Owen Thompson","doi":"10.1162/edfp_a_00415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Racial segregation can occur not only between schools but also within schools, and there has been particular concern that gifted & talented (G&T) programs may increase within-school segregation at the primary school level. This paper evaluates the contribution of gifted & talented education to racial segregation using data on the presence and racial composition of G&T programs at virtually all U.S. elementary schools over a span of nine school years. I first show that, consistent with widespread perceptions, G&T programs do disproportionately enroll white and Asian students while Black, Hispanic and Native American students are underrepresented. Next, I calculate the changes in the Dissimilarity and Exposure Indices that occur when G&T programs are treated as fully separate schools, which provides a transparent measure of their contribution to overall racial segregation. These calculations indicate that accounting for the within-school racial sorting caused by G&T education increases the Dissimilarity Index by 10-20%, and has little to no impact on the Exposure Index. Finally, to study the potential effects of G&T programs on enrollments over time, I estimate event study models for schools initiating or discontinuing G&T programs, and find no large changes in white or Asian enrollment after programs are eliminated or initiated. I conclude that G&T education's impact on racial segregation in U.S. elementary schools is modest, although changes in G&T programming could still be one meaningful tool to increase integration.","PeriodicalId":46870,"journal":{"name":"Education Finance and Policy","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Finance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Racial segregation can occur not only between schools but also within schools, and there has been particular concern that gifted & talented (G&T) programs may increase within-school segregation at the primary school level. This paper evaluates the contribution of gifted & talented education to racial segregation using data on the presence and racial composition of G&T programs at virtually all U.S. elementary schools over a span of nine school years. I first show that, consistent with widespread perceptions, G&T programs do disproportionately enroll white and Asian students while Black, Hispanic and Native American students are underrepresented. Next, I calculate the changes in the Dissimilarity and Exposure Indices that occur when G&T programs are treated as fully separate schools, which provides a transparent measure of their contribution to overall racial segregation. These calculations indicate that accounting for the within-school racial sorting caused by G&T education increases the Dissimilarity Index by 10-20%, and has little to no impact on the Exposure Index. Finally, to study the potential effects of G&T programs on enrollments over time, I estimate event study models for schools initiating or discontinuing G&T programs, and find no large changes in white or Asian enrollment after programs are eliminated or initiated. I conclude that G&T education's impact on racial segregation in U.S. elementary schools is modest, although changes in G&T programming could still be one meaningful tool to increase integration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天才项目和种族隔离
种族隔离不仅可能发生在学校之间,也可能发生在学校内部。天才(G&T)项目可能会增加小学阶段的校内隔离。本文评价了资优学生的贡献。通过对几乎所有美国小学9年的g&t课程的存在和种族构成的数据,将天才教育与种族隔离进行了对比。我首先表明,与普遍的看法一致,g&t项目确实不成比例地招收了白人和亚裔学生,而黑人、西班牙裔和美洲原住民学生的比例不足。接下来,我计算了当G&T项目被视为完全独立的学校时,差异指数和暴露指数的变化,这为它们对整体种族隔离的贡献提供了一个透明的衡量标准。这些计算表明,考虑到由G&T教育引起的校内种族分类,差异指数增加了10-20%,对暴露指数几乎没有影响。最后,为了研究G&T项目随着时间的推移对入学率的潜在影响,我估计了启动或停止G&T项目的学校的事件研究模型,发现在项目被取消或启动后,白人或亚洲人的入学率没有大的变化。我的结论是,在美国小学中,虽然G&T教育对种族隔离的影响不大,但G&T课程的改变仍然可以成为增加种族融合的一个有意义的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Making the (Letter) Grade: The Incentive Effects of Mandatory Pass/Fail Courses How Well Do Professional Reference Ratings Predict Teacher Performance? The Academic and Behavioral Impacts of an Autism Health Insurance Mandate: Evidence from Massachusetts A Bridge to Graduation: Post-Secondary Effects of an Alternative Pathway for Students Who Fail High School Exit Exams At What Cost? Is Technical Education Worth the Investment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1