Post COVID Thrombotic Sequelae: Once Bitten, Twice Shy!

Cherian Roy, Rohit Kumar Patnaik, Samir Samal, Shakti Bedanta Mishra, Nupur Karan
{"title":"Post COVID Thrombotic Sequelae: Once Bitten, Twice Shy!","authors":"Cherian Roy, Rohit Kumar Patnaik, Samir Samal, Shakti Bedanta Mishra, Nupur Karan","doi":"10.13107/jaccr.2023.v09.i03.227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Long Covid has been recognized as a distinct entity with thrombotic sequelae [1]. Persistent systemic vascular inflammation caused by thrombosis drives the complications associated with long COVID. The risks of arterial and venous thrombosis after COVID-19 extend well beyond the hospitalization period. Early prophylactic anticoagulation has been shown to reduce the incidence of post-covid thrombotic sequelae [2]. Some evidence suggests the use of a higher than prophylactic dose for primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, especially in patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) [1]. We present a case of long Covid who developed recurrent thrombosis despite being on a therapeutic dose of anticoagulation. Case Presentation A 55-year-old male was brought to our Emergency Department with complaints of diffuse abdominal pain and black-coloured stools for three days. Contrast-enhanced CT abdomen (CECT) showed distal superior mesenteric artery (SMA) thrombosis and splenic infarct (Figure 1). He was treated for mild Covid-19 infection three months back. History also revealed he was hospitalized two months ago with a diagnosis of non-ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and acute ischemic stroke (Figure 2), which was managed with antiplatelets, statins and anticoagulants. He was discharged on oral anticoagulants (Tab Rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily) for three months and was on regular follow-up. There was no history of smoking or hypertension. Protein C, Protien S, homocysteine levels were normal. After the diagnosis of SMA thrombosis, his anti-coagulation was increased to Tab Rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily. No further thrombotic episodes have been noted as of date. Discussion This case suggests that unexplained repeat thrombotic events at multiple sites may have been a consequence of Covid-19 infection. Covid-19 patients experience both arterial and venous thromboembolism [3]. Most commonly, the former presents as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, whereas the latter as deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Mechanisms include changes in lung structure secondary to chronic hypoxia, persistent immune dysfunction, and endothelial damage [1]. Risks of thrombotic events after mild Covid-19 are less clear, with the need and intensity of prophylactic anti-coagulation in this subset of patients being a matter of future research [4]. Shabaka et al. have shown that patients with a history of Covid-19 infection and previous thromboembolic events were at higher risk of developing a repeat thrombotic event [5]. Physicians need to be vigilant about the thrombotic events in patients with long Covid, even in patients receiving therapeutic anti-coagulation. Such patients require more frequent monitoring for signs of thrombotic events, risk factor management, and adherence to preventive therapies [3].","PeriodicalId":484438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of anaesthesia and critical care case reports","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of anaesthesia and critical care case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jaccr.2023.v09.i03.227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Long Covid has been recognized as a distinct entity with thrombotic sequelae [1]. Persistent systemic vascular inflammation caused by thrombosis drives the complications associated with long COVID. The risks of arterial and venous thrombosis after COVID-19 extend well beyond the hospitalization period. Early prophylactic anticoagulation has been shown to reduce the incidence of post-covid thrombotic sequelae [2]. Some evidence suggests the use of a higher than prophylactic dose for primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, especially in patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) [1]. We present a case of long Covid who developed recurrent thrombosis despite being on a therapeutic dose of anticoagulation. Case Presentation A 55-year-old male was brought to our Emergency Department with complaints of diffuse abdominal pain and black-coloured stools for three days. Contrast-enhanced CT abdomen (CECT) showed distal superior mesenteric artery (SMA) thrombosis and splenic infarct (Figure 1). He was treated for mild Covid-19 infection three months back. History also revealed he was hospitalized two months ago with a diagnosis of non-ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and acute ischemic stroke (Figure 2), which was managed with antiplatelets, statins and anticoagulants. He was discharged on oral anticoagulants (Tab Rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily) for three months and was on regular follow-up. There was no history of smoking or hypertension. Protein C, Protien S, homocysteine levels were normal. After the diagnosis of SMA thrombosis, his anti-coagulation was increased to Tab Rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily. No further thrombotic episodes have been noted as of date. Discussion This case suggests that unexplained repeat thrombotic events at multiple sites may have been a consequence of Covid-19 infection. Covid-19 patients experience both arterial and venous thromboembolism [3]. Most commonly, the former presents as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, whereas the latter as deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Mechanisms include changes in lung structure secondary to chronic hypoxia, persistent immune dysfunction, and endothelial damage [1]. Risks of thrombotic events after mild Covid-19 are less clear, with the need and intensity of prophylactic anti-coagulation in this subset of patients being a matter of future research [4]. Shabaka et al. have shown that patients with a history of Covid-19 infection and previous thromboembolic events were at higher risk of developing a repeat thrombotic event [5]. Physicians need to be vigilant about the thrombotic events in patients with long Covid, even in patients receiving therapeutic anti-coagulation. Such patients require more frequent monitoring for signs of thrombotic events, risk factor management, and adherence to preventive therapies [3].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID后血栓后遗症:一朝被蛇咬,十年怕井绳!
长冠状病毒已被认为是具有血栓性后遗症的独特实体[1]。血栓形成引起的持续全身性血管炎症可导致与长COVID相关的并发症。COVID-19后动脉和静脉血栓形成的风险远远超出住院期。早期预防性抗凝已被证明可以降低covid - 19后血栓后遗症的发生率[2]。一些证据表明,原发性静脉血栓栓塞预防使用高于预防剂量,特别是有静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)病史的患者[1]。我们提出了一个长期Covid谁开发复发血栓形成的情况下,尽管在治疗剂量的抗凝。病例介绍一名55岁男性,因弥漫性腹痛及黑便三天来急诊科就诊。腹部增强CT (CECT)显示肠系膜远上动脉(SMA)血栓形成和脾梗死(图1)。3个月前因轻度Covid-19感染接受治疗。病史还显示,他两个月前因诊断为非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和急性缺血性中风住院(图2),并使用抗血小板药物、他汀类药物和抗凝血药物治疗。出院后给予口服抗凝剂(利伐沙班15 mg,每日2次)3个月,并定期随访。没有吸烟史或高血压史。蛋白C,蛋白S,同型半胱氨酸水平正常。诊断为SMA血栓形成后,增加抗凝治疗至利伐沙班20 mg,每日2次。到目前为止,没有进一步的血栓发作。本病例提示,多个部位不明原因的重复血栓事件可能是Covid-19感染的结果。Covid-19患者可发生动脉和静脉血栓栓塞[3]。最常见的是前者表现为心肌梗死和缺血性中风,而后者表现为深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞。其机制包括继发于慢性缺氧、持续免疫功能障碍和内皮损伤的肺结构改变[1]。轻度Covid-19后血栓形成事件的风险尚不清楚,这部分患者预防性抗凝的需要和强度有待于未来的研究[4]。Shabaka等人的研究表明,有Covid-19感染史和既往血栓栓塞事件的患者发生重复血栓事件的风险更高[5]。医生需要警惕长Covid患者的血栓形成事件,即使是接受治疗性抗凝治疗的患者。这类患者需要更频繁地监测血栓形成事件的迹象,进行风险因素管理,并坚持预防性治疗[3]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intra-Operative Supplementary Motor Area Aphosia During Awake Craniotomy a Case Report Sonographic Resolution of B-Lines after Diuresis in a Pregnant Patient with Preeclampsia Associated Pulmonary Edema Post COVID Thrombotic Sequelae: Once Bitten, Twice Shy! A Case of Cardiac Arrest During Parotidectomy Surgery Perioperative Analgesia for Forequarter Amputation in a Morbidly Obese Patient: Dual ESP Block Catheters Plus Interscalene Block
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1