Comparison of a Traditional Soybean Meal-Based Diet to a Defatted Black Soldier Fly Larvae Meal-Based Diet for Broilers

IF 3.9 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE World's Poultry Science Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.3390/poultry2030032
Sashka Chobanova, Nikolay Karkelanov, Stephen Charles Mansbridge, Isobel Margaret Whiting, Antonija Simic, Stephen Paul Rose, Vasil Radoslavov Pirgozliev
{"title":"Comparison of a Traditional Soybean Meal-Based Diet to a Defatted Black Soldier Fly Larvae Meal-Based Diet for Broilers","authors":"Sashka Chobanova, Nikolay Karkelanov, Stephen Charles Mansbridge, Isobel Margaret Whiting, Antonija Simic, Stephen Paul Rose, Vasil Radoslavov Pirgozliev","doi":"10.3390/poultry2030032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The production of soybean meal (SBM) has a substantial impact on the environment and reducing its inclusion in poultry diets by using alternative protein sources, such as insect meal, is an important challenge for nutritionists. This study aimed to compare the productive performance of broiler chickens fed one of two isonitrogenic (195 g/kg CP) and isocaloric (12.91 MJ/kg) diets. The first diet contained SBM as the main protein source, whereas SBM was completely replaced by defatted meal from Black Soldier Fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.; BSFL) in the second diet. Compared to the BSFL diet, the final body weight (BW) and weight gain (WG) of birds fed the SBM diet was ~17% greater and feed was utilised 19% more efficiently (p < 0.05). The differences in WG and FCR were supported by improved energy metabolism metrics, fat digestibility and digestibility of acid detergent fibres (ADFD) (p < 0.05). The present study shows that a complete replacement of dietary SBM with BSFL meal must be achieved with care, ensuring that all other factors (e.g., insect processing technology, feed additive supplementation, non-protein nitrogen accounting, mineral balance, fatty acid profile, amino acid supplementation) have been considered.","PeriodicalId":24003,"journal":{"name":"World's Poultry Science Journal","volume":"346 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World's Poultry Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry2030032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The production of soybean meal (SBM) has a substantial impact on the environment and reducing its inclusion in poultry diets by using alternative protein sources, such as insect meal, is an important challenge for nutritionists. This study aimed to compare the productive performance of broiler chickens fed one of two isonitrogenic (195 g/kg CP) and isocaloric (12.91 MJ/kg) diets. The first diet contained SBM as the main protein source, whereas SBM was completely replaced by defatted meal from Black Soldier Fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.; BSFL) in the second diet. Compared to the BSFL diet, the final body weight (BW) and weight gain (WG) of birds fed the SBM diet was ~17% greater and feed was utilised 19% more efficiently (p < 0.05). The differences in WG and FCR were supported by improved energy metabolism metrics, fat digestibility and digestibility of acid detergent fibres (ADFD) (p < 0.05). The present study shows that a complete replacement of dietary SBM with BSFL meal must be achieved with care, ensuring that all other factors (e.g., insect processing technology, feed additive supplementation, non-protein nitrogen accounting, mineral balance, fatty acid profile, amino acid supplementation) have been considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉鸡传统豆粕型饲粮与脱脂黑虻幼虫型饲粮的比较
豆粕(SBM)的生产对环境有重大影响,通过使用昆虫粉等替代蛋白质来源来减少其在家禽日粮中的含量,是营养学家面临的一个重要挑战。本试验旨在比较两种等氮(195 g/kg CP)和等热量(12.91 MJ/kg)饲粮对肉鸡生产性能的影响。第1组饲料中蛋白质主要来源为豆粕,以黑兵蝇幼虫(Hermetia illucens L.)的脱脂饲料代替豆粕;BSFL)。与BSFL饲粮相比,SBM饲粮的最终体重(BW)和增重(WG)提高了17%,饲料利用率提高了19% (p <0.05)。改善的能量代谢指标、脂肪消化率和酸性洗涤纤维消化率支持了WG和FCR的差异(p <0.05)。目前的研究表明,用BSFL粉完全替代饲粮中的SBM必须小心谨慎,确保考虑所有其他因素(如昆虫加工技术、饲料添加剂补充、非蛋白氮核算、矿物质平衡、脂肪酸分布、氨基酸补充)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World's Poultry Science Journal
World's Poultry Science Journal 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: World''s Poultry Science Journal is the official publication of the World’s Poultry Science Association. The journal provides authoritative reviews in poultry science and an international forum for the exchange and dissemination of information including research, education and industry organisation. Each issue includes poultry industry-related news, regional reports on global developments in poultry, reports from specialist scientific working groups, book reviews, association news and a calendar of forthcoming events. Coverage includes breeding, nutrition, welfare, husbandry, production systems, processing, product development, physiology, egg and meat quality, industry structure, economics and education. The journal is of interest to academics, researchers, students, extension workers and commercial poultry producers.
期刊最新文献
The evolution of H5N1 influenza viruses in Indonesia to mammalian hosts: a review of molecular markers An update on characterisation and applications of mesenchymal stem cells from chickens with challenges and prospective review Stop culling male layer-type chick: an overview of the alternatives and public perspective Possibilities of productive and reproductive performance improvement in geese: part II non-genetic factors Evaluation of the Addition of Humicola Grisea Cellulase to Broiler Chicken Rations for a 21-Day Period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1