Ozolian Locris in Roman Times: A Lost People in a Fragmented Land

Tekmeria Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.12681/tekmeria.35450
George Zachos
{"title":"Ozolian Locris in Roman Times: A Lost People in a Fragmented Land","authors":"George Zachos","doi":"10.12681/tekmeria.35450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"
 
 
 Pausanias, arriving at Amphissa shortly after AD 170, met with Aitolian residents -instead of Locrians- who wanted to renounce the Locrian past of the city. These Aitolians, according to him, had refused to move to Patras or Nicopolis, when Augustus divided Aitolia between the two new colonies. Pausanias also visited Myania, Chaleion and Naupactos and mentions that the rest of the Ozolian Locris, except Amphissa, was “under the control” of the Greeks of Patras. The combination of the ancient sources (Pausanias, Strabo, Pliny and the epigraphic record of West Locris) with the archaeological finds from the region provides some information on the status of the Ozolian cities in the Roman period. The new status quo imposed by Rome in Aitolia and in Epictetos Aitolia fragmented the Hesperians and strongly affected the settlement pattern of the region. As far as Amphissa is concerned, an honorary inscription from the sanctuary of Athena Kranaia in Elateia may shed light on the matter of its new Aitolian population.
 
 
","PeriodicalId":30095,"journal":{"name":"Tekmeria","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tekmeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/tekmeria.35450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pausanias, arriving at Amphissa shortly after AD 170, met with Aitolian residents -instead of Locrians- who wanted to renounce the Locrian past of the city. These Aitolians, according to him, had refused to move to Patras or Nicopolis, when Augustus divided Aitolia between the two new colonies. Pausanias also visited Myania, Chaleion and Naupactos and mentions that the rest of the Ozolian Locris, except Amphissa, was “under the control” of the Greeks of Patras. The combination of the ancient sources (Pausanias, Strabo, Pliny and the epigraphic record of West Locris) with the archaeological finds from the region provides some information on the status of the Ozolian cities in the Roman period. The new status quo imposed by Rome in Aitolia and in Epictetos Aitolia fragmented the Hesperians and strongly affected the settlement pattern of the region. As far as Amphissa is concerned, an honorary inscription from the sanctuary of Athena Kranaia in Elateia may shed light on the matter of its new Aitolian population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马时代的奥佐利亚·罗克瑞斯:破碎土地上迷失的民族
& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;包萨尼亚在公元170年后不久到达安非萨,会见了想要放弃该城过去的洛克利亚人的艾托利亚居民,而不是洛克利亚人。根据他的说法,当奥古斯都将艾托利亚划分为两个新殖民地时,这些艾托利亚人拒绝搬到帕特雷或尼科波利斯。Pausanias还访问了缅甸,Chaleion和Naupactos,并提到除了Amphissa之外,其余的Ozolian Locris都在Patras的希腊人“控制之下”。古代资料(包萨尼亚、斯特拉博、普林尼和西洛克里斯的铭文记录)与该地区的考古发现相结合,为罗马时期奥索里亚城市的地位提供了一些信息。罗马在艾托利亚和爱比克泰托斯艾托利亚强加的新现状分裂了西班牙人,并强烈影响了该地区的定居模式。就安菲萨而言,埃拉提亚雅典娜·克拉纳亚神庙的荣誉铭文可能会揭示其新阿托利亚人口的问题。& # x0D;& # x0D;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deconstructing a Prussian Myth: The Athenian Standards Decree (IG I3 1453a-g) Μια νέα ερμηνεία ενός γκράφιτι από υστερορωμαϊκή οικία της αρχαίας Ελεύθερνας Ionic Art and Script in Archaic Macedonia: Origin(s), Medium(s), Effect(s) Ionic Art and Script in Archaic Macedonia: Origin(s), Medium(s), Effect(s) “Tomb of the Philosophers” in Pella, Macedonia Revisited: New Findings on Its Iconography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1