Preservation of Antibodies to Vaccine-Controlled Infections in Children WITH Oncological Diseases

S. M. Kharit, Yu. E. Konstantinova, O. V. Goleva, A. A. Ruleva, K. K. Tikhomirova, O. V. Iozefovich, I. V. Fridman
{"title":"Preservation of Antibodies to Vaccine-Controlled Infections in Children WITH Oncological Diseases","authors":"S. M. Kharit, Yu. E. Konstantinova, O. V. Goleva, A. A. Ruleva, K. K. Tikhomirova, O. V. Iozefovich, I. V. Fridman","doi":"10.31631/2073-3046-2023-22-4-35-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. Cancer therapy forms a temporary immunosuppressive state, which determines an increase in the frequency and severity of infectious diseases. Vaccination is a highly effective and safe way to protect against infection, but people with immunodeficiency have risks of inefficiency and complications. To substantiate the need for immunoprophylaxis in cancer patients after therapy, it is important to understand the preservation of their specific response after previous vaccinations.The aim of the study was to assess the safety of antibodies to vaccine–controlled infections in children with oncological diseases after therapyMaterials and methods. The safety of antibodies to vaccine-controlled infections was studied in 3 groups: 1 -in patients with oncological (n=62); 2-in the group (n=43) withoutoncological diseases, but who received immunosuppressive (IST) and/or polychemotherapy (PCT) and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and 3– in healthy children (n=31 – comparison group). The concentration of antibodies was determined by the ELISA method. The minimum protective level was considered to be the amount for measles ³0.18 IU/ml, rubella - ³25 IU/ml; hepatitis B - ³10 IU/ml; diphtheria – 0.03 IU/ml and higher. The coefficient of positivity, estimated as protective against mumps, was ³1.0.Results. It was found that from 41.7% to 93.7% of children with cancer lose post-vaccination immunity to the studied vaccine antigens. The number of children who retained the protective level of antibodies in groups 1 and 2 was significantly less than in the comparison group. There were no significant differences in the level of those protected from diphtheria and rubella. The maximum effect on the loss of antibodies is provided by the performed HSCT. For diphtheria and rubella antibodies, the differences are not pronounced. The possible connection of genetic breakdowns in 35 examined children with oncological diseases and the safety of antibodies was analyzed. It turned out that in the presence of chromosomal deletions, antibodies to measles were lost in 100% of cases and to diphtheria in 75%, which was different from other chromosomal abnormalities.Conclusion. The safety of antibodies in patients with a history of cancer is influenced by the presence of HSCT in therapy, the type of genetic breakdown, as well as the peculiarity of the vaccine antigen. Children with oncological diseases, as well as with non-oncological ones, but who have received HSCT therapy, should be vaccinated again against vaccine-controlled infections, despite the indication of the presence of vaccinations before therapy.","PeriodicalId":36064,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2023-22-4-35-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. Cancer therapy forms a temporary immunosuppressive state, which determines an increase in the frequency and severity of infectious diseases. Vaccination is a highly effective and safe way to protect against infection, but people with immunodeficiency have risks of inefficiency and complications. To substantiate the need for immunoprophylaxis in cancer patients after therapy, it is important to understand the preservation of their specific response after previous vaccinations.The aim of the study was to assess the safety of antibodies to vaccine–controlled infections in children with oncological diseases after therapyMaterials and methods. The safety of antibodies to vaccine-controlled infections was studied in 3 groups: 1 -in patients with oncological (n=62); 2-in the group (n=43) withoutoncological diseases, but who received immunosuppressive (IST) and/or polychemotherapy (PCT) and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and 3– in healthy children (n=31 – comparison group). The concentration of antibodies was determined by the ELISA method. The minimum protective level was considered to be the amount for measles ³0.18 IU/ml, rubella - ³25 IU/ml; hepatitis B - ³10 IU/ml; diphtheria – 0.03 IU/ml and higher. The coefficient of positivity, estimated as protective against mumps, was ³1.0.Results. It was found that from 41.7% to 93.7% of children with cancer lose post-vaccination immunity to the studied vaccine antigens. The number of children who retained the protective level of antibodies in groups 1 and 2 was significantly less than in the comparison group. There were no significant differences in the level of those protected from diphtheria and rubella. The maximum effect on the loss of antibodies is provided by the performed HSCT. For diphtheria and rubella antibodies, the differences are not pronounced. The possible connection of genetic breakdowns in 35 examined children with oncological diseases and the safety of antibodies was analyzed. It turned out that in the presence of chromosomal deletions, antibodies to measles were lost in 100% of cases and to diphtheria in 75%, which was different from other chromosomal abnormalities.Conclusion. The safety of antibodies in patients with a history of cancer is influenced by the presence of HSCT in therapy, the type of genetic breakdown, as well as the peculiarity of the vaccine antigen. Children with oncological diseases, as well as with non-oncological ones, but who have received HSCT therapy, should be vaccinated again against vaccine-controlled infections, despite the indication of the presence of vaccinations before therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤疾病儿童疫苗控制感染抗体的保存
的相关性。癌症治疗形成暂时的免疫抑制状态,这决定了传染病发生频率和严重程度的增加。疫苗接种是一种非常有效和安全的预防感染的方法,但免疫缺陷患者存在效率低下和并发症的风险。为了证实癌症患者在治疗后需要免疫预防,重要的是要了解他们在先前接种疫苗后的特异性反应的保存。本研究的目的是评估儿童肿瘤疾病治疗后抗疫苗控制感染抗体的安全性。在三组中研究了抗体对疫苗控制感染的安全性:1 -in肿瘤患者(n=62);2例为无肿瘤疾病,但接受免疫抑制(IST)和/或多化疗(PCT)和/或造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的组(n=43), 3例为健康儿童(n=31 -对照组)。ELISA法测定抗体浓度。麻疹的最低保护水平为0.18 IU/ml,风疹为25 IU/ml;乙型肝炎- 10 IU/ml;白喉- 0.03 IU/ml及以上。阳性系数,估计对腮腺炎有保护作用,为³1.0。结果。结果发现,41.7% ~ 93.7%的癌症儿童在接种疫苗后对所研究的疫苗抗原失去免疫力。第1组和第2组保持抗体保护水平的儿童人数明显少于对照组。在预防白喉和风疹的人群中,免疫球蛋白水平没有显著差异。对抗体损失的最大影响是通过进行造血干细胞移植。对于白喉和风疹抗体,差异并不明显。分析了35例肿瘤疾病患儿的遗传缺陷与抗体安全性的可能联系。结果发现,在存在染色体缺失的情况下,麻疹抗体100%丢失,白喉抗体75%丢失,这与其他染色体异常不同。结论。在有癌症病史的患者中,抗体的安全性受到治疗中HSCT的存在、遗传破坏的类型以及疫苗抗原的特性的影响。患有肿瘤疾病的儿童,以及患有非肿瘤疾病的儿童,但接受了造血干细胞移植治疗,应再次接种疫苗,以防止疫苗控制的感染,尽管有迹象表明在治疗前接种疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika
Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Conjugated Vaccines and the Problem of Changing Circulating Serotypes of Pneumococcus Specificity of Teaching in the Section «General Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases» for Foreign Students Similarities and Differences in the Manifestations of the COVID-19 Epidemic Process in Some Countries Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Use of Personal Protective Equipment by Personnel of Medical Organizations of Various Profiles in the Provision of Medical Care to Patients with COVID-19 Assessment of the State of Antidiphtheria Immunity in Different Age Groups of the Population of the Russian Federation Based on Seromonitoring Data for 2015–2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1