Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Detection of Myocarditis in Patients Recovered from COVID-19

Mohamed Ibrahim Awadeen
{"title":"Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Detection of Myocarditis in Patients Recovered from COVID-19","authors":"Mohamed Ibrahim Awadeen","doi":"10.19080/jocct.2023.18.555997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess cardiac involvement in patients recovered from COVID-19 with no clinical evidence of myocarditis, using various non-invasive parameters including Transthoracic Two-dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography (STE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Cardiology Departments of Maadi Military Hospital and Benha University Hospitals. A total of 74 patients were initially enrolled during their hospital stay, but only 50 of them met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The CMR examination was performed in conjunction with echocardiography, ECG, and laboratory investigations on the same day, which occurred 2-12 weeks after recovering from confirmed COVID-19 infection. Patient scheduling for CMR and other examinations depended on the availability of the CMR machine. Results: According to CMR diagnosis, 23 (46%) patients were diagnosed to have myocarditis by CMR, the patients were categorized into two groups based on these results: normal group (27 patients) &amp; myocarditis group (23 patients). According to GLS, 21 (42%) patients were diagnosed to have myocarditis by STE (diagnosis of Myocarditis with Global longitudinal strain was considered with cut-off point of >-21.33 with Sensitivity of 91.30% and Specificity of 92.59% (P <0.0001). 2D STE showed 87.50% sensitivity, 92.31% specificity and 90.00% accuracy to diagnose myocarditis, while CMR showed a 95.83% sensitivity, 96.15% specificity of and 96.00% accuracy. Conclusion: Myocarditis was found in 46% of asymptomatic COVID-19-recovered patients. CMR is a valuable tool for early myocarditis detection when combined with 2D STE, offering high accuracy. Significant differences were observed between suspected myocarditis patients and those with normal results on both 2D STE and CMR.","PeriodicalId":73635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/jocct.2023.18.555997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess cardiac involvement in patients recovered from COVID-19 with no clinical evidence of myocarditis, using various non-invasive parameters including Transthoracic Two-dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography (STE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Cardiology Departments of Maadi Military Hospital and Benha University Hospitals. A total of 74 patients were initially enrolled during their hospital stay, but only 50 of them met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The CMR examination was performed in conjunction with echocardiography, ECG, and laboratory investigations on the same day, which occurred 2-12 weeks after recovering from confirmed COVID-19 infection. Patient scheduling for CMR and other examinations depended on the availability of the CMR machine. Results: According to CMR diagnosis, 23 (46%) patients were diagnosed to have myocarditis by CMR, the patients were categorized into two groups based on these results: normal group (27 patients) & myocarditis group (23 patients). According to GLS, 21 (42%) patients were diagnosed to have myocarditis by STE (diagnosis of Myocarditis with Global longitudinal strain was considered with cut-off point of >-21.33 with Sensitivity of 91.30% and Specificity of 92.59% (P <0.0001). 2D STE showed 87.50% sensitivity, 92.31% specificity and 90.00% accuracy to diagnose myocarditis, while CMR showed a 95.83% sensitivity, 96.15% specificity of and 96.00% accuracy. Conclusion: Myocarditis was found in 46% of asymptomatic COVID-19-recovered patients. CMR is a valuable tool for early myocarditis detection when combined with 2D STE, offering high accuracy. Significant differences were observed between suspected myocarditis patients and those with normal results on both 2D STE and CMR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心血管磁共振成像在COVID-19康复患者心肌炎早期检测中的作用
目的:应用经胸二维散斑追踪超声心动图(STE)和心脏磁共振成像(CMR)等无临床证据的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者康复后心脏受累情况评估。方法:本前瞻性研究在马地军队医院和滨海大学附属医院心内科进行。共有74名患者在住院期间被纳入研究,但其中只有50人符合纳入和排除标准。CMR检查与超声心动图、心电图和实验室检查在同一天进行,发生在COVID-19确诊感染恢复后2-12周。患者安排CMR和其他检查取决于CMR机器的可用性。结果:根据CMR诊断,23例(46%)患者被诊断为心肌炎,根据结果将患者分为正常组(27例)和正常组(27例);心肌炎组23例。根据GLS,有21例(42%)患者经STE诊断为心肌炎(考虑诊断为全局纵向应变心肌炎,截断点为>-21.33,敏感性为91.30%,特异性为92.59% (P <0.0001)。2D STE诊断心肌炎的敏感性为87.50%,特异性为92.31%,准确率为90.00%;CMR诊断心肌炎的敏感性为95.83%,特异性为96.15%,准确率为96.00%。结论:46%的新冠肺炎无症状康复患者存在心肌炎。CMR结合2D STE是早期心肌炎检测的宝贵工具,具有很高的准确性。疑似心肌炎患者与2D STE和CMR结果正常的患者之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Detection of Myocarditis in Patients Recovered from COVID-19 Ldl-c Levels In Secondary Prevention: The Lower The Better and The Sooner The Better Mechanical Pulmonary Valve Thrombosis: Recurrence and Response to Thrombolytic Therapy Ocular Ischemic Syndrome as a Clue for Carotid Artery Stenosis The results of Percutaneous Transcatheter Pulmonary valvuloplasty in Adult Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1