Revisiting “the Great Divergence”: Clarifying the Two Major Modes of Agricultural Change in China and the West

Q3 Arts and Humanities Rural China Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1163/22136746-12341300
Philip C. C. Huang
{"title":"Revisiting “the Great Divergence”: Clarifying the Two Major Modes of Agricultural Change in China and the West","authors":"Philip C. C. Huang","doi":"10.1163/22136746-12341300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Kenneth Pomeranz and Li Bozhong have recently conceded that they had been wrong that “the great divergence” between China and the West occurred only after 1800, but they continue to insist that when it came to agriculture and its labor productivity, their earlier argument still holds. This article summarizes the broad differences between eighteenth-century England’s crops cum animal husbandry agriculture and China’s crops-only agriculture to demonstrate the fundamental differences between the two. It is time we recognize fully how very different the two were and are, and how and why each follows an entirely different pattern to modern development. It is simply wrong to continue to obscure those basic differences by insisting on equivalence between them.","PeriodicalId":37171,"journal":{"name":"Rural China","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22136746-12341300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Kenneth Pomeranz and Li Bozhong have recently conceded that they had been wrong that “the great divergence” between China and the West occurred only after 1800, but they continue to insist that when it came to agriculture and its labor productivity, their earlier argument still holds. This article summarizes the broad differences between eighteenth-century England’s crops cum animal husbandry agriculture and China’s crops-only agriculture to demonstrate the fundamental differences between the two. It is time we recognize fully how very different the two were and are, and how and why each follows an entirely different pattern to modern development. It is simply wrong to continue to obscure those basic differences by insisting on equivalence between them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视“大分流”:厘清中西方农业变革的两种主要模式
彭默兰(Kenneth Pomeranz)和李伯忠(Li Bozhong)最近承认,他们错误地认为中西之间的“大分化”只发生在1800年之后,但他们继续坚持认为,在农业及其劳动生产率方面,他们早期的论点仍然成立。本文总结了18世纪英国种植业和畜牧业农业与中国种植业农业之间的巨大差异,以说明两者之间的根本差异。现在是我们充分认识到两者过去和现在是多么不同的时候了,以及它们如何和为什么遵循一种与现代发展完全不同的模式。继续通过坚持它们之间的对等来模糊这些基本差异,这是完全错误的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rural China
Rural China Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
What Is Minimalist Governance? Connecting Small Peasants with Large Markets: The Need for a New Type of Rural Collective Economy – a Case Study of Zhanqi Village “Whither the Chinese Peasant Economy?”: An Introduction Smallholders in Capitalist Agriculture: Persistence and Challenges Peasant Agency and Community Mutual Aid: An Alternative to Capital and Market Dominance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1