Questions for Suicide Risk Assessment: There, Then and How to Measure?

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.17759/cpp.2023310201

K.A. Chistopolskaya, N.I. Kolachev, S.N. Enikolopov

{"title":"Questions for Suicide Risk Assessment: There, Then and How to Measure?","authors":"K.A. Chistopolskaya, N.I. Kolachev, S.N. Enikolopov","doi":"10.17759/cpp.2023310201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Diagnostics of suicide risk is an important, but only developing domain in suicidology. Objective. This study aims to clarify the problems and perspectives in this scientific field. The main issues related to measuring this construct are posed and analyzed: the setting, the object of measurement, and the specifics of the available tools. Results. The inference is made about the importance of these variables when choosing a method for measuring suicide risk, as well as the need to combine diagnostics and therapy. Conclusion.The typology for choosing the methods of intervention based on the Narrative Crisis Model of Suicide by I. Galynker is provided. The limitations of the modern diagnostic methods are indicated, the call to rely not so much on various diagnostic tools as on the structured clinical judgment, and also be guided not so much by the presence or absence of suicidal ideation in a respondent, but by understanding their current frustrated needs.","PeriodicalId":43458,"journal":{"name":"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2023310201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Diagnostics of suicide risk is an important, but only developing domain in suicidology. Objective. This study aims to clarify the problems and perspectives in this scientific field. The main issues related to measuring this construct are posed and analyzed: the setting, the object of measurement, and the specifics of the available tools. Results. The inference is made about the importance of these variables when choosing a method for measuring suicide risk, as well as the need to combine diagnostics and therapy. Conclusion.The typology for choosing the methods of intervention based on the Narrative Crisis Model of Suicide by I. Galynker is provided. The limitations of the modern diagnostic methods are indicated, the call to rely not so much on various diagnostic tools as on the structured clinical judgment, and also be guided not so much by the presence or absence of suicidal ideation in a respondent, but by understanding their current frustrated needs.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

自杀风险评估的问题:在那里，然后以及如何测量?

p style="text-align: align;">自杀风险诊断在自杀学中是一个重要的，但只是发展中的领域。& lt; strong>客观灵活;/ strong>本研究旨在澄清该科学领域的问题和观点。与测量这个结构相关的主要问题被提出并分析:设置、测量的对象和可用工具的细节。& lt; strong> Results。在选择一种衡量自杀风险的方法时，这些变量的重要性以及将诊断和治疗结合起来的必要性得到了推断。Conclusion。基于加林克(I. Galynker)的自杀叙事危机模型，给出了干预方式选择的类型学。作者指出了现代诊断方法的局限性，呼吁不要过多地依赖各种诊断工具，而要依赖结构化的临床判断，并且不要过多地根据被调查者是否有自杀意念来指导，而是要了解他们当前受挫的需求。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊