LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF GOODS/SERVICES PROVIDER FOR BUILDING FAILURE

Tulus Yudi Widodo Wibowo, Syofyan Hadi
{"title":"LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF GOODS/SERVICES PROVIDER FOR BUILDING FAILURE","authors":"Tulus Yudi Widodo Wibowo, Syofyan Hadi","doi":"10.55047/polri.v2i3.727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction failure can be caused by a failure in the process of procuring goods or services, or it may occur during the construction process itself. Construction work failure refers to a condition where the results of construction work do not comply with the agreed work specifications in the construction work contract, either partially or entirely, due to the fault of the service user or service provider. The purpose of this study is to analyze the responsibility of goods/services providers in the event of a building failure and to examine the form of their responsibility in such cases. This study adopts a descriptive normative approach to answer questions regarding the responsibilities of goods/services providers in cases of building failures, as outlined in Legislation Number 18 of 1999 concerning Construction Services, which was renewed as Number 2 of 2017 Construction Services, Government Regulation Number 29 of 2000 concerning construction service providers, and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of goods/services providers in the event of building failures, which include meeting the Standards for Security, Safety, Health, and Sustainability, undergoing inspection by a team of experts appointed directly by the Minister, and complying within a maximum period of 10 (ten) years from the final delivery of Construction Services. The responsibility of goods/services providers for building failures is based on the principle of Liability based on Fault and is administered through written warnings, administrative fines, temporary suspension of construction service activities, inclusion in the black list, and even suspension or revocation of permits.","PeriodicalId":499977,"journal":{"name":"POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v2i3.727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction failure can be caused by a failure in the process of procuring goods or services, or it may occur during the construction process itself. Construction work failure refers to a condition where the results of construction work do not comply with the agreed work specifications in the construction work contract, either partially or entirely, due to the fault of the service user or service provider. The purpose of this study is to analyze the responsibility of goods/services providers in the event of a building failure and to examine the form of their responsibility in such cases. This study adopts a descriptive normative approach to answer questions regarding the responsibilities of goods/services providers in cases of building failures, as outlined in Legislation Number 18 of 1999 concerning Construction Services, which was renewed as Number 2 of 2017 Construction Services, Government Regulation Number 29 of 2000 concerning construction service providers, and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of goods/services providers in the event of building failures, which include meeting the Standards for Security, Safety, Health, and Sustainability, undergoing inspection by a team of experts appointed directly by the Minister, and complying within a maximum period of 10 (ten) years from the final delivery of Construction Services. The responsibility of goods/services providers for building failures is based on the principle of Liability based on Fault and is administered through written warnings, administrative fines, temporary suspension of construction service activities, inclusion in the black list, and even suspension or revocation of permits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
货物/服务供应商对楼宇故障的法律责任
施工失败可能是由于采购货物或服务过程中的失败引起的,也可能是在施工过程中本身发生的。施工不合格,是指由于服务使用者或者服务提供者的过错,造成施工成果部分或者全部不符合施工合同约定的施工规范的情况。本研究的目的是分析货物/服务提供者在建筑物发生故障时的责任,并检查他们在这种情况下的责任形式。本研究采用描述性规范方法来回答有关建筑故障情况下货物/服务提供商责任的问题,如1999年关于建筑服务的第18号立法(该立法已更新为2017年建筑服务第2号)、2000年关于建筑服务提供商的第29号政府法规以及有关建筑故障情况下货物/服务提供商责任的法规所述。其中包括符合保安、安全、健康和可持续性标准,接受部长直接任命的专家小组的检查,并在最终交付建筑服务后的最长10(十)年内遵守规定。货物/服务供应商对楼宇故障的责任,以“以错为责”原则为基础,透过书面警告、行政罚款、暂停建筑服务活动、列入黑名单,甚至暂停或撤销许可证等方式加以执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SETTLEMENT OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN BASED ON BALINESE CUSTOMARY LAW CURATOR'S LEGAL EFFORTS AGAINST BANKRUPTCY ESTATE (BOEDEL) ASSETS SEIZED IN CRIMINAL CONFISCATION OF CORRUPTION CASES ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROTECTION FOR ONLINE SHOPPING CONSUMERS SUBPOENA AS A FORM OF DEVELOPER'S LEGAL EFFORT TO CONSUMERS IN CANCELING PROPERTY RESERVATIONS JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE CLAUSE OF WITHHOLDING THE ORIGINAL DIPLOMA OF WORKERS BY THE COMPANY IN THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1