Examining Learner-Controlled Role-Switching in Dyad Practice for the Learning of a Speed Cup-Stacking Task.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2023.2283538
Molly Brillinger, April Karlinsky, Jae Patterson
{"title":"Examining Learner-Controlled Role-Switching in Dyad Practice for the Learning of a Speed Cup-Stacking Task.","authors":"Molly Brillinger, April Karlinsky, Jae Patterson","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2023.2283538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dyad practice has proven to be an efficient, and in some cases, a more effective method of promoting motor learning compared to individual practice. Further, providing individuals control over their own or another learner's practice environment has also been shown to be superior for skill learning relative to individuals without control. The purpose of the experiment was to assess learner-controlled role-switching in dyad practice conditions. In dyads, partners either alternated actor and observer roles on a trial-to-trial basis, or under novel learner-controlled conditions wherein either the actor or the observer was given control over when the partners should switch roles. Participants practiced a speed cup-stacking task and learning was assessed in 24-h retention and transfer tests. Although there were no learning differences between dyad conditions, paired learners effectively chose when to switch roles with their partner, without undermining learning. The results also highlight the dynamic nature of dyad practice as the observers chose to switch roles more frequently than the actors, yet both dyad groups adopted comparable switching strategies by alternating roles following relatively 'good' and 'bad' trials. This experiment provides further support for dyad practice as an efficient and effective method of skill learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2023.2283538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dyad practice has proven to be an efficient, and in some cases, a more effective method of promoting motor learning compared to individual practice. Further, providing individuals control over their own or another learner's practice environment has also been shown to be superior for skill learning relative to individuals without control. The purpose of the experiment was to assess learner-controlled role-switching in dyad practice conditions. In dyads, partners either alternated actor and observer roles on a trial-to-trial basis, or under novel learner-controlled conditions wherein either the actor or the observer was given control over when the partners should switch roles. Participants practiced a speed cup-stacking task and learning was assessed in 24-h retention and transfer tests. Although there were no learning differences between dyad conditions, paired learners effectively chose when to switch roles with their partner, without undermining learning. The results also highlight the dynamic nature of dyad practice as the observers chose to switch roles more frequently than the actors, yet both dyad groups adopted comparable switching strategies by alternating roles following relatively 'good' and 'bad' trials. This experiment provides further support for dyad practice as an efficient and effective method of skill learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对偶练习中学习者控制角色转换对快速叠杯任务学习的影响
与单独练习相比,双人练习被证明是一种有效的,在某些情况下,是一种更有效的促进运动学习的方法。此外,让个体控制自己或其他学习者的练习环境也被证明比没有控制的个体更有利于技能学习。本实验的目的是评估二元练习条件下学习者控制的角色转换。在二人组中,合作伙伴要么在试对试的基础上交替扮演参与者和观察者的角色,要么在新的学习者控制的条件下,在这种条件下,参与者或观察者可以控制伙伴何时应该转换角色。参与者练习快速叠杯任务,并通过24小时记忆和转移测试评估学习能力。虽然两组条件之间没有学习差异,但配对学习者在不影响学习的情况下,有效地选择了何时与伴侣转换角色。研究结果还强调了二元组合练习的动态性质,因为观察者比参与者更频繁地选择转换角色,然而两个二元组合组都采用了类似的转换策略,在相对“好”和“坏”的试验后交替角色。本实验进一步支持了二元练习作为一种高效的技能学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Development of an Effector-Specific Stop Signal Task with Higher Complexity: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Age-Related Development of Bilateral Coordination of the Upper Limbs in Children and Adolescents. Inter-Digit Low Level Force Coordination in a Complex Isometric Pinch Tracking Task Effects of External Pacing Type on the Cross-Education of Motor Skill. Eye Movement Differences in Contact Versus Non-Contact Olympic Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1