What role for electric vehicles in the decarbonization of the car transport sector in Europe?

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Transportation Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecotra.2022.100283
Christina Littlejohn , Stef Proost
{"title":"What role for electric vehicles in the decarbonization of the car transport sector in Europe?","authors":"Christina Littlejohn ,&nbsp;Stef Proost","doi":"10.1016/j.ecotra.2022.100283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span><span>The transport sector is the only sector where carbon emissions<span><span> continue to grow. This has led policy makers to propose ambitious policies to reduce emissions in the car sector, in particular carbon emissions standards, portfolio mandates for Electric Vehicles and purchase taxes or subsidies. We use a stylized two-period model for the car </span>manufacturing sector to compare the </span></span>cost efficiency of these policies. The model has gasoline fueled cars (GV) compete with battery electric cars (EV). Both types of cars have endogenous technological progress that is triggered by </span>environmental policies, including tradable carbon emissions standards, portfolio mandates, </span>carbon taxes, purchase taxes and R&amp;D subsidies. Parked EVs can serve as batteries that help grid operators to shift off peak (renewable) electricity to peak hour supply. The model is calibrated to evaluate the </span>EU policy to reduce average carbon emissions of new cars by 37,5% in 2030 compared to 2021. We assess the cost-efficiency of policy instruments evaluating vehicle costs and prices, fuel costs, and externalities. We find that a carbon emissions standard achieves emission reductions at a much lower cost than a portfolio mandate for electric cars.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45761,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transportation","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221201222200034X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transport sector is the only sector where carbon emissions continue to grow. This has led policy makers to propose ambitious policies to reduce emissions in the car sector, in particular carbon emissions standards, portfolio mandates for Electric Vehicles and purchase taxes or subsidies. We use a stylized two-period model for the car manufacturing sector to compare the cost efficiency of these policies. The model has gasoline fueled cars (GV) compete with battery electric cars (EV). Both types of cars have endogenous technological progress that is triggered by environmental policies, including tradable carbon emissions standards, portfolio mandates, carbon taxes, purchase taxes and R&D subsidies. Parked EVs can serve as batteries that help grid operators to shift off peak (renewable) electricity to peak hour supply. The model is calibrated to evaluate the EU policy to reduce average carbon emissions of new cars by 37,5% in 2030 compared to 2021. We assess the cost-efficiency of policy instruments evaluating vehicle costs and prices, fuel costs, and externalities. We find that a carbon emissions standard achieves emission reductions at a much lower cost than a portfolio mandate for electric cars.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动汽车在欧洲汽车运输部门的脱碳中扮演什么角色?
交通运输部门是唯一一个碳排放量持续增长的部门。这导致政策制定者提出了雄心勃勃的政策,以减少汽车行业的排放,特别是碳排放标准,电动汽车的组合授权以及购置税或补贴。我们对汽车制造业使用一个程式化的两期模型来比较这些政策的成本效率。该车型让汽油燃料汽车(GV)与纯电动汽车(EV)展开竞争。这两种类型的汽车都有内生的技术进步,这是由环境政策引发的,包括可交易的碳排放标准、组合授权、碳税、购置税和研发补贴。停放的电动汽车可以充当电池,帮助电网运营商将峰值(可再生)电力转移到高峰时段供应。该模型经过校准,以评估欧盟2030年新车平均碳排放量比2021年减少37.5%的政策。我们评估了评估车辆成本和价格、燃料成本和外部性的政策工具的成本效率。我们发现,与电动汽车的投资组合授权相比,碳排放标准实现减排的成本要低得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Free rides to cleaner air? Examining the impact of massive public transport fare discounts on air quality Unionised dockworkers and port ownership structure in an international oligopoly Editorial Board Microgeographic speed, reliability, and traffic externalities Pricing effects of code-sharing in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1