Emília Silva Gonçalves, Maíra Seabra de Assumpção, Maria Fátima Correa Pimenta Servidoni, Elizete Aparecida Lomazi, José Dirceu Ribeiro
{"title":"Multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH and psychometric properties in gastroesophageal reflux: systematic review","authors":"Emília Silva Gonçalves, Maíra Seabra de Assumpção, Maria Fátima Correa Pimenta Servidoni, Elizete Aparecida Lomazi, José Dirceu Ribeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedp.2020.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Systematically assess studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Systematically verify studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic review considering specific descriptors (children and adolescents, gastroesophageal reflux disease and multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH) and their synonyms. The systematic search was carried out in the MEDLINE/Ovid, Scopus, and Embase databases, considering the period from October 2017 to December 2018. This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA), which was used for study selection. The psychometric properties described in the studies were: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reproducibility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sensitivity was discussed in most studies, with a result of more than 70% in four of them. Specificity was assessed only in conjunction with sensitivity, with values from 23% to 25% in two studies, and it reached 80% in a single study. Accuracy was assessed higher than 76% in one of the selected articles. The methodological quality of the studies demonstrated low risk of bias, and there was no significant concern related to applicability of the studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>According to the selected studies, multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH was considered a safe and effective tool, presenting higher sensitivity values than pHmetry regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100742,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","volume":"96 6","pages":"Pages 673-685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2020.03.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553620300288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Systematically assess studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Systematically verify studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric patients.
Methods
Systematic review considering specific descriptors (children and adolescents, gastroesophageal reflux disease and multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH) and their synonyms. The systematic search was carried out in the MEDLINE/Ovid, Scopus, and Embase databases, considering the period from October 2017 to December 2018. This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA), which was used for study selection. The psychometric properties described in the studies were: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reproducibility.
Results
Sensitivity was discussed in most studies, with a result of more than 70% in four of them. Specificity was assessed only in conjunction with sensitivity, with values from 23% to 25% in two studies, and it reached 80% in a single study. Accuracy was assessed higher than 76% in one of the selected articles. The methodological quality of the studies demonstrated low risk of bias, and there was no significant concern related to applicability of the studies.
Conclusions
According to the selected studies, multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH was considered a safe and effective tool, presenting higher sensitivity values than pHmetry regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.