Multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH and psychometric properties in gastroesophageal reflux: systematic review

Emília Silva Gonçalves, Maíra Seabra de Assumpção, Maria Fátima Correa Pimenta Servidoni, Elizete Aparecida Lomazi, José Dirceu Ribeiro
{"title":"Multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH and psychometric properties in gastroesophageal reflux: systematic review","authors":"Emília Silva Gonçalves,&nbsp;Maíra Seabra de Assumpção,&nbsp;Maria Fátima Correa Pimenta Servidoni,&nbsp;Elizete Aparecida Lomazi,&nbsp;José Dirceu Ribeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedp.2020.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Systematically assess studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Systematically verify studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic review considering specific descriptors (children and adolescents, gastroesophageal reflux disease and multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH) and their synonyms. The systematic search was carried out in the MEDLINE/Ovid, Scopus, and Embase databases, considering the period from October 2017 to December 2018. This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA), which was used for study selection. The psychometric properties described in the studies were: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reproducibility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sensitivity was discussed in most studies, with a result of more than 70% in four of them. Specificity was assessed only in conjunction with sensitivity, with values from 23% to 25% in two studies, and it reached 80% in a single study. Accuracy was assessed higher than 76% in one of the selected articles. The methodological quality of the studies demonstrated low risk of bias, and there was no significant concern related to applicability of the studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>According to the selected studies, multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH was considered a safe and effective tool, presenting higher sensitivity values than pHmetry regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100742,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","volume":"96 6","pages":"Pages 673-685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2020.03.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553620300288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Systematically assess studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Systematically verify studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric patients.

Methods

Systematic review considering specific descriptors (children and adolescents, gastroesophageal reflux disease and multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH) and their synonyms. The systematic search was carried out in the MEDLINE/Ovid, Scopus, and Embase databases, considering the period from October 2017 to December 2018. This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA), which was used for study selection. The psychometric properties described in the studies were: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reproducibility.

Results

Sensitivity was discussed in most studies, with a result of more than 70% in four of them. Specificity was assessed only in conjunction with sensitivity, with values from 23% to 25% in two studies, and it reached 80% in a single study. Accuracy was assessed higher than 76% in one of the selected articles. The methodological quality of the studies demonstrated low risk of bias, and there was no significant concern related to applicability of the studies.

Conclusions

According to the selected studies, multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH was considered a safe and effective tool, presenting higher sensitivity values than pHmetry regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃食管反流的多通道腔内阻抗- pH值和心理测量特性:系统综述
目的系统评价多通道腔内阻抗- pH在胃食管反流诊断中的心理测量特性。系统验证分析多通道腔内阻抗- pH在儿科患者胃食管反流病诊断中的心理测量特性的研究。方法系统回顾考虑特定描述符(儿童和青少年、胃食管反流疾病和多通道腔内阻抗- pH)及其同义词。系统检索MEDLINE/Ovid、Scopus和Embase数据库,检索时间为2017年10月至2018年12月。本综述是根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行的,该项目用于研究选择。研究中描述的心理测量特性是:敏感性、特异性、准确性和可重复性。结果大多数研究都讨论了敏感性,其中4项研究的结果超过70%。特异性仅与敏感性一起评估,两项研究的值从23%到25%不等,一项研究的值达到80%。在选定的一篇文章中,准确率评估高于76%。研究的方法学质量表明偏倚风险较低,研究的适用性没有显著问题。结论根据所选的研究,多通道腔内阻抗- pH被认为是一种安全有效的工具,在诊断胃食管反流病方面比pH法具有更高的灵敏度值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of constipation in cystic fibrosis patients: a systematic review of observational studies Multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH and psychometric properties in gastroesophageal reflux: systematic review Evaluation of varicella vaccine effectiveness as public health tool for increasing scientific evidence and improving vaccination programs The importance of risk factors for bullying perpetration and victimization Low back pain in adolescents and association with sociodemographic factors, electronic devices, physical activity and mental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1