Development and validation of an instrument for monitoring child development indicators

Sonia I. Venancio , Maritsa C. Bortoli , Paulo G. Frias , Elsa R.J. Giugliani , Cláudia R.L. Alves , Miriam O. Santos
{"title":"Development and validation of an instrument for monitoring child development indicators","authors":"Sonia I. Venancio ,&nbsp;Maritsa C. Bortoli ,&nbsp;Paulo G. Frias ,&nbsp;Elsa R.J. Giugliani ,&nbsp;Cláudia R.L. Alves ,&nbsp;Miriam O. Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To create and validate an instrument for child development monitoring.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Methodological study, based on the World Bank's proposition to monitor child development indicators in low‐ and middle‐income countries. The stages of the study included the following: development of an inventory of items for child development evaluation, based on open access instruments; content validation by a group of experts on the topic, using consensus techniques; selection of questions to describe children and their families; pre‐test of the instrument during the vaccination campaign in 2016 in three municipalities, and conducting cognitive interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 431 items were sent for the evaluation of the specialists; 77 were initially excluded and the others were evaluated in‐person by the group, with 162 items covering the motor, cognitive, language, and socio‐emotional domains, distributed in ten age ranges. Questions about health, nutrition, early learning, protection and safety, and responsive care were also included. The instrument was applied by volunteer undergraduate students to 367 mothers of children under 5 years, showing good adherence of the caregivers. The time of application of the questionnaire was, on average, 20<!--> <!-->minutes. The cognitive interviews allowed the final adjustment of 19 items of the instrument for better understanding by the caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The instrument created and validated by experts fills a gap, as it allows a comprehensive evaluation of the development of children under 5 years at the population level, using a fast and inexpensive tool, and can be useful for monitoring indicators of development in Brazilian children in vaccination campaigns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100742,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","volume":"96 6","pages":"Pages 778-789"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.10.008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553619302034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To create and validate an instrument for child development monitoring.

Methods

Methodological study, based on the World Bank's proposition to monitor child development indicators in low‐ and middle‐income countries. The stages of the study included the following: development of an inventory of items for child development evaluation, based on open access instruments; content validation by a group of experts on the topic, using consensus techniques; selection of questions to describe children and their families; pre‐test of the instrument during the vaccination campaign in 2016 in three municipalities, and conducting cognitive interviews.

Results

A total of 431 items were sent for the evaluation of the specialists; 77 were initially excluded and the others were evaluated in‐person by the group, with 162 items covering the motor, cognitive, language, and socio‐emotional domains, distributed in ten age ranges. Questions about health, nutrition, early learning, protection and safety, and responsive care were also included. The instrument was applied by volunteer undergraduate students to 367 mothers of children under 5 years, showing good adherence of the caregivers. The time of application of the questionnaire was, on average, 20 minutes. The cognitive interviews allowed the final adjustment of 19 items of the instrument for better understanding by the caregivers.

Conclusions

The instrument created and validated by experts fills a gap, as it allows a comprehensive evaluation of the development of children under 5 years at the population level, using a fast and inexpensive tool, and can be useful for monitoring indicators of development in Brazilian children in vaccination campaigns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定和确认监测儿童发展指标的工具
目的研制并验证一种儿童发育监测仪器。方法基于世界银行关于监测低收入和中等收入国家儿童发展指标的建议,进行方法学研究。研究的各个阶段包括:根据开放获取工具编制儿童发展评价项目清单;由一组关于该主题的专家使用共识技术进行内容验证;选择描述儿童及其家庭的问题;2016年在三个城市的疫苗接种运动期间对该仪器进行了预测试,并进行了认知访谈。结果共收到431个项目供专家评价;77人最初被排除在外,其他人由小组亲自评估,162项涵盖运动、认知、语言和社会情感领域,分布在10个年龄段。还包括关于健康、营养、早期学习、保护和安全以及响应性护理的问题。该仪器由大学生志愿者应用于367名5岁以下儿童的母亲,显示出良好的依从性。使用问卷的时间平均为20分钟。认知访谈允许对工具的19个项目进行最终调整,以便照顾者更好地理解。由专家创建和验证的工具填补了一个空白,因为它允许在人口水平上使用快速和廉价的工具对5岁以下儿童的发育进行全面评估,并且可以用于监测巴西儿童在疫苗接种运动中的发育指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of constipation in cystic fibrosis patients: a systematic review of observational studies Multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH and psychometric properties in gastroesophageal reflux: systematic review Evaluation of varicella vaccine effectiveness as public health tool for increasing scientific evidence and improving vaccination programs The importance of risk factors for bullying perpetration and victimization Low back pain in adolescents and association with sociodemographic factors, electronic devices, physical activity and mental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1