Inference procedures about population correlations under order restrictions

Q Mathematics Statistical Methodology Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.stamet.2016.09.001
Gregory E. Wilding, Mark C. Baker
{"title":"Inference procedures about population correlations under order restrictions","authors":"Gregory E. Wilding,&nbsp;Mark C. Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.stamet.2016.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The testing of equality of several Pearson correlations can be found in a number of scientific fields. We surmise in many such cases that the alternatives of interest in practice are, in deed, order restricted, and therefore the researcher is best served by use of testing procedures developed for those specific alternatives. In this note we introduce a collection of tests for use in testing equality of </span><span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span><span><span> correlation coefficients against order alternatives, with an emphasis on simple order. Specifically, we propose </span>likelihood ratio tests<span> and contrast tests based on the well known Fisher Z transformation as well as tests which make use of generalized variable methodologies. The proposed procedures are empirically compared with regard to type I and II error rates via Monte Carlo simulations studies, and the use of the approaches is illustrated using an example. These tests are found to be vastly superior to tests for the general alternative, and the contrast tests based on the Fisher Z transformation are recommended for practice based on the observed test properties and simplicity.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48877,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.stamet.2016.09.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572312716300296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The testing of equality of several Pearson correlations can be found in a number of scientific fields. We surmise in many such cases that the alternatives of interest in practice are, in deed, order restricted, and therefore the researcher is best served by use of testing procedures developed for those specific alternatives. In this note we introduce a collection of tests for use in testing equality of k correlation coefficients against order alternatives, with an emphasis on simple order. Specifically, we propose likelihood ratio tests and contrast tests based on the well known Fisher Z transformation as well as tests which make use of generalized variable methodologies. The proposed procedures are empirically compared with regard to type I and II error rates via Monte Carlo simulations studies, and the use of the approaches is illustrated using an example. These tests are found to be vastly superior to tests for the general alternative, and the contrast tests based on the Fisher Z transformation are recommended for practice based on the observed test properties and simplicity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
序约束下种群相关性的推理过程
在许多科学领域都可以找到对几个皮尔逊相关的相等性的检验。我们推测,在许多这样的情况下,在实践中感兴趣的替代方案,实际上,顺序限制,因此,研究人员最好使用测试程序开发的那些特定的替代方案。在本文中,我们介绍了一组测试,用于测试k相关系数对顺序选择的等式,重点是简单顺序。具体来说,我们提出了基于著名的Fisher Z变换的似然比检验和对比检验,以及使用广义变量方法的检验。通过蒙特卡罗模拟研究,对所提出的程序进行了关于I型和II型错误率的经验比较,并通过一个例子说明了这些方法的使用。这些测试被发现远远优于一般替代测试,并且根据观察到的测试特性和简单性,推荐基于Fisher Z变换的对比测试用于实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methodology
Statistical Methodology STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-
CiteScore
0.59
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Statistical Methodology aims to publish articles of high quality reflecting the varied facets of contemporary statistical theory as well as of significant applications. In addition to helping to stimulate research, the journal intends to bring about interactions among statisticians and scientists in other disciplines broadly interested in statistical methodology. The journal focuses on traditional areas such as statistical inference, multivariate analysis, design of experiments, sampling theory, regression analysis, re-sampling methods, time series, nonparametric statistics, etc., and also gives special emphasis to established as well as emerging applied areas.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Nonparametric M-estimation for right censored regression model with stationary ergodic data Symmetric directional false discovery rate control Estimation and goodness-of-fit in latent trait models: A comparison among theoretical approaches Some new results on the Rényi quantile entropy Ordering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1