Cross‐cultural adaptation and validation of the universal Portuguese‐version of the Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue (pedsFACIT‐F)

Karla P. Fernandes , Bruno S. Teixeira , Benjamin J. Arnold , Tânia M. da S. Mendonça , Sthela M. Oliveira , Carlos Henrique M. da Silva
{"title":"Cross‐cultural adaptation and validation of the universal Portuguese‐version of the Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue (pedsFACIT‐F)","authors":"Karla P. Fernandes ,&nbsp;Bruno S. Teixeira ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Arnold ,&nbsp;Tânia M. da S. Mendonça ,&nbsp;Sthela M. Oliveira ,&nbsp;Carlos Henrique M. da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To cross‐culturally adapt and validate the universal Portuguese version of the Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue (pedsFACIT‐F).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The universal Portuguese version of the pedsFACIT‐F was cross‐culturally adapted and validated in 323 children and adolescents aged 8–18 years, 173 healthy individuals, and 150 with chronic diseases (cancer, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and diabetes). Reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reliability) was assessed. Item response theory model assumptions were evaluated using confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. Items were calibrated using a graded response model. Differential item functioning was assessed regarding age, gender, and clinical condition (healthy <em>vs.</em> chronic diseases).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No major cultural adaptations were needed. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.84) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.92) were good. CFA (CFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.92, TLI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.90, RMSEA<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.097) and CFE analysis confirmed sufficient unidimensionality. The data also fit the GRM and demonstrated good coverage of the fatigue construct (threshold parameters range: −1.42 to 4.56). No items demonstrated significant differential item functioning.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The universal Portuguese version of the pedsFACIT‐F provides a reliable, precise, and valid measure after being assessed by robust psychometric properties. Stability of the measurement properties of the pedsFACIT‐F scale allows its use to assess fatigue in clinical research in Portuguese‐speaking children and adolescents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100742,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","volume":"96 4","pages":"Pages 456-463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.05.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553619300850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To cross‐culturally adapt and validate the universal Portuguese version of the Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue (pedsFACIT‐F).

Method

The universal Portuguese version of the pedsFACIT‐F was cross‐culturally adapted and validated in 323 children and adolescents aged 8–18 years, 173 healthy individuals, and 150 with chronic diseases (cancer, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and diabetes). Reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reliability) was assessed. Item response theory model assumptions were evaluated using confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. Items were calibrated using a graded response model. Differential item functioning was assessed regarding age, gender, and clinical condition (healthy vs. chronic diseases).

Results

No major cultural adaptations were needed. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92) were good. CFA (CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.097) and CFE analysis confirmed sufficient unidimensionality. The data also fit the GRM and demonstrated good coverage of the fatigue construct (threshold parameters range: −1.42 to 4.56). No items demonstrated significant differential item functioning.

Conclusion

The universal Portuguese version of the pedsFACIT‐F provides a reliable, precise, and valid measure after being assessed by robust psychometric properties. Stability of the measurement properties of the pedsFACIT‐F scale allows its use to assess fatigue in clinical research in Portuguese‐speaking children and adolescents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通用葡萄牙语版儿童慢性疾病治疗-疲劳功能评估(pedsFACIT‐F)的跨文化适应和验证
目的跨文化适应和验证通用葡萄牙语版儿科慢性疾病治疗功能评估-疲劳(pedsFACIT‐F)。方法采用通用葡萄牙语版本的pedsFACIT‐F,在323名8-18岁的儿童和青少年、173名健康个体和150名慢性疾病(癌症、青少年特发性关节炎和糖尿病)患者中进行跨文化适应和验证。评估信度(内部一致性和重测信度)。项目反应理论模型假设采用验证性和探索性因素分析进行评估。项目采用分级反应模型进行校准。根据年龄、性别和临床状况(健康vs.慢性疾病)评估差异项目功能。结果不需要进行重大的文化适应。内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84)和重测信度(类内相关系数= 0.92)较好。CFA (CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.097)和CFE分析证实了足够的单维性。数据也符合GRM,并证明了疲劳结构的良好覆盖率(阈值参数范围:−1.42至4.56)。没有项目表现出显著的差异项目功能。结论葡萄牙语通用版pedsFACIT‐F在经过稳健的心理测量特性评估后,提供了一个可靠、精确和有效的测量方法。pedsFACIT - F量表测量特性的稳定性允许其在葡语儿童和青少年的临床研究中用于评估疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of constipation in cystic fibrosis patients: a systematic review of observational studies Multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH and psychometric properties in gastroesophageal reflux: systematic review Evaluation of varicella vaccine effectiveness as public health tool for increasing scientific evidence and improving vaccination programs The importance of risk factors for bullying perpetration and victimization Low back pain in adolescents and association with sociodemographic factors, electronic devices, physical activity and mental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1