Emulsifying activity of commercial sugar beet pectins with aromatic and aliphatic oils

IF 4.6 Q1 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Food Hydrocolloids for Health Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fhfh.2022.100099
Vivien Pham , Blanca Elizabeth Morales-Contreras , Fanbin Kong , Louise Wicker
{"title":"Emulsifying activity of commercial sugar beet pectins with aromatic and aliphatic oils","authors":"Vivien Pham ,&nbsp;Blanca Elizabeth Morales-Contreras ,&nbsp;Fanbin Kong ,&nbsp;Louise Wicker","doi":"10.1016/j.fhfh.2022.100099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Commercial sugar beet pectin (SBP), 1.5% (w/v), was emulsified with three structurally different oils at 15% (w/v), aromatic limonene, aliphatic medium chain triglycerides (MCT), and aliphatic rice bran oil (RBO). Stability of RBO emulsified with four commercial pectins was determined. Emulsions had volume-based diameter, (D<sub>4,3</sub> values) ≤ 2 μm at day 0. Emulsions made with limonene showed the largest particle size increase from day 0 to day 1 (≤3.34 μm) and reached 10 μm by day 9. Emulsions made with MCT had similar (p&gt;0.05) particle sizes between day 1 and day 30 (≤3.83 μm); emulsions made with RBO had similar (p&gt;0.05) particle sizes throughout the entire study (≤3.77 μm). Light microscopy images reflected similar trends as particle size data. Emulsions prepared with RBO were fitted following the Power-Law model and displayed shear-thinning behavior with a flow behavior index of 0.940 or 0.894 at day 0 and 30, respectively. Emulsions prepared with four commercial pectins and RBO had similar particle size and light microscopy, but consistency index was higher and more shear thinning after 30 days in two pectins. Commercial beet pectins had similar protein content, degree of esterification, molecular weight and surface hydrophobicity. Galacturonic acid content and neutral sugar content varied between pectins. Particle size, light microscopy and rheological parameters show variability in SBP emulsion stability with aromatic and different aliphatic oils. For emulsions prepared with a single oil, RBO, emulsion stability varies between different lots of pectin that is not predicted by typical specifications of commercial SBP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12385,"journal":{"name":"Food Hydrocolloids for Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667025922000462/pdfft?md5=210380df059d3387f300369b796b4346&pid=1-s2.0-S2667025922000462-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hydrocolloids for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667025922000462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Commercial sugar beet pectin (SBP), 1.5% (w/v), was emulsified with three structurally different oils at 15% (w/v), aromatic limonene, aliphatic medium chain triglycerides (MCT), and aliphatic rice bran oil (RBO). Stability of RBO emulsified with four commercial pectins was determined. Emulsions had volume-based diameter, (D4,3 values) ≤ 2 μm at day 0. Emulsions made with limonene showed the largest particle size increase from day 0 to day 1 (≤3.34 μm) and reached 10 μm by day 9. Emulsions made with MCT had similar (p>0.05) particle sizes between day 1 and day 30 (≤3.83 μm); emulsions made with RBO had similar (p>0.05) particle sizes throughout the entire study (≤3.77 μm). Light microscopy images reflected similar trends as particle size data. Emulsions prepared with RBO were fitted following the Power-Law model and displayed shear-thinning behavior with a flow behavior index of 0.940 or 0.894 at day 0 and 30, respectively. Emulsions prepared with four commercial pectins and RBO had similar particle size and light microscopy, but consistency index was higher and more shear thinning after 30 days in two pectins. Commercial beet pectins had similar protein content, degree of esterification, molecular weight and surface hydrophobicity. Galacturonic acid content and neutral sugar content varied between pectins. Particle size, light microscopy and rheological parameters show variability in SBP emulsion stability with aromatic and different aliphatic oils. For emulsions prepared with a single oil, RBO, emulsion stability varies between different lots of pectin that is not predicted by typical specifications of commercial SBP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商品甜菜果胶与芳香油和脂肪油的乳化活性
将1.5% (w/v)的商品甜菜果胶(SBP)与三种结构不同的油(15% (w/v)),芳香柠檬烯,脂肪族中链甘油三酯(MCT)和脂肪族米糠油(RBO)乳化。测定了四种商用果胶乳化RBO的稳定性。在第0天,乳液的体积直径(D4,3值)≤2 μm。添加柠檬烯的乳剂在第0天至第1天的粒径增幅最大(≤3.34 μm),第9天达到10 μm。在第1天和第30天,MCT制成的乳剂的粒径相似(p>0.05)(≤3.83 μm);RBO制备的乳剂在整个研究过程中具有相似的(p>0.05)粒径(≤3.77 μm)。光学显微镜图像反映了与粒度数据相似的趋势。用RBO制备的乳剂符合幂律模型拟合,在第0天和第30天表现出剪切减薄的特性,流动特性指数分别为0.940和0.894。4种商品果胶与RBO制备的乳剂粒径和光镜下相似,但两种果胶在30 d后的稠度指数更高,剪切变薄现象更严重。商品甜菜果胶具有相似的蛋白质含量、酯化程度、分子量和表面疏水性。不同果胶的半乳糖醛酸含量和中性糖含量不同。颗粒大小、光镜和流变学参数显示芳香油和不同脂肪油对SBP乳液稳定性的影响。对于用单一油RBO制备的乳剂,乳剂的稳定性在不同批次的果胶之间是不同的,这是商业SBP的典型规格所不能预测的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from mulberry leaf through hot melt extrusion: Enhanced antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and anticancer properties Silkworm pupae protein-based film incorporated with Catharanthus roseus leaf extract-based nanoparticles enhanced the lipid stability and microbial quality of cheddar cheese Re-processing of pharmaceutical herb residues using isolated probiotics from plant sources and their beneficial effects on diarrhea Investigating next-generation edible packaging: Protein-based films and coatings for delivering active compounds Recent advances on antimicrobial peptide and polysaccharide hydrogels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1