Impact of scientific and technological innovation policies on innovation efficiency of high-technology industrial parks – A dual analysis with linear regression and QCA

Jinglei Wang , Xiao Ma , Yixuan Zhao , Jing Zhao , Mohammad Heydari
{"title":"Impact of scientific and technological innovation policies on innovation efficiency of high-technology industrial parks – A dual analysis with linear regression and QCA","authors":"Jinglei Wang ,&nbsp;Xiao Ma ,&nbsp;Yixuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Jing Zhao ,&nbsp;Mohammad Heydari","doi":"10.1016/j.ijis.2022.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scientific and technological innovation policies play a critical role in the innovative development of high-technology industrial parks. However, it remains unclear how scientific and technological innovation policies impact the innovation efficiency of high-technology industrial parks and what the impact pathways are. An in-depth investigation of this topic can give an insight into the inherent relation between the scientific and technological innovation policies and technological innovation. By conducting a theoretical analysis, this study empirically analyzed the impact of scientific and technological innovation policies on the innovation efficiency of high-technology industrial parks. The main research methods applied in this study were linear regression and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). The results showed that the policy targets drove innovation efficiency in a relatively minor way. Among all policy tools, the demand-based policy tools had the most significant influence on innovation efficiency. The supply-based and environment-based policy tools had notable positive impacts during the lag periods of policies. The policy mix pathways for scientific and technological innovation policies that impact innovation efficiency come in four forms, namely, the targets-directed, demand-driven, supply-dominated environment optimization, and environment-dominated comprehensive pathways. Therefore, this study put forward proposals on classifying and refining the scientific and technological innovation policies and optimizing the policy mix-driven models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36449,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 169-182"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248722000273/pdfft?md5=6271bccde4a53d76b673b8c18b829362&pid=1-s2.0-S2096248722000273-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248722000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific and technological innovation policies play a critical role in the innovative development of high-technology industrial parks. However, it remains unclear how scientific and technological innovation policies impact the innovation efficiency of high-technology industrial parks and what the impact pathways are. An in-depth investigation of this topic can give an insight into the inherent relation between the scientific and technological innovation policies and technological innovation. By conducting a theoretical analysis, this study empirically analyzed the impact of scientific and technological innovation policies on the innovation efficiency of high-technology industrial parks. The main research methods applied in this study were linear regression and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). The results showed that the policy targets drove innovation efficiency in a relatively minor way. Among all policy tools, the demand-based policy tools had the most significant influence on innovation efficiency. The supply-based and environment-based policy tools had notable positive impacts during the lag periods of policies. The policy mix pathways for scientific and technological innovation policies that impact innovation efficiency come in four forms, namely, the targets-directed, demand-driven, supply-dominated environment optimization, and environment-dominated comprehensive pathways. Therefore, this study put forward proposals on classifying and refining the scientific and technological innovation policies and optimizing the policy mix-driven models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科技创新政策对高新技术产业园区创新效率的影响——基于线性回归和QCA的双重分析
科技创新政策对高技术产业园区的创新发展起着至关重要的作用。然而,科技创新政策对高新技术产业园区创新效率的影响机制和影响途径尚不明确。对这一问题的深入研究,有助于我们深入了解科技创新政策与技术创新之间的内在联系。本文通过理论分析,实证分析了科技创新政策对高新技术产业园区创新效率的影响。本研究采用的主要研究方法是线性回归和定性比较分析(QCA)。结果表明,政策目标对创新效率的驱动作用相对较小。在所有政策工具中,需求型政策工具对创新效率的影响最为显著。供给型政策工具和环境型政策工具在政策滞后期具有显著的正向影响。影响创新效率的科技创新政策组合路径有目标导向路径、需求驱动路径、供给主导的环境优化路径和环境主导的综合路径四种形式。为此,本文提出了对科技创新政策进行分类提炼和优化政策混合驱动模型的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Innovation Studies
International Journal of Innovation Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Education program and experiential learning in Chinese entrepreneurship education: A year-long Social Cognitive Theory intervention's impact on self-efficacy and intention Evolution of policy-driven ecosystem of original innovation talents Green human resource to stimulate low carbon behaviour through the mediation role of innovation practices and organizational commitment Innovation capabilities and their dimensions: A systematic literature review The role of multidisciplinary collaborations in publishing innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1