Propofol use in newborns and children: is it safe? A systematic review

Eduardo Mekitarian Filho , Mariana Barbosa Riechelmann
{"title":"Propofol use in newborns and children: is it safe? A systematic review","authors":"Eduardo Mekitarian Filho ,&nbsp;Mariana Barbosa Riechelmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine the main indications and assess the most common adverse events with the administration of hypnotic propofol in most pediatric clinical scenarios.</p></div><div><h3>Sources</h3><p>A systematic review of PubMed, SciELO, Cochrane, and EMBASE was performed, using filters such as a maximum of five years post‐publication, and/or references or articles of importance, with emphasis on clinical trials using propofol. All articles of major relevance were blind‐reviewed by both authors according to the PRISMA statement, looking for possible bias and limitations or the quality of the articles.</p></div><div><h3>Summary of the findings</h3><p>Through the search criterion applied, 417 articles were found, and their abstracts evaluated. A total of 69 papers were thoroughly studied. Articles about propofol use in children are increasing, including in neonates, with the majority being cohort studies and clinical trials in two main scenarios: upper digestive endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. A huge list of adverse events has been published, but most articles considered them of low risk.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Propofol is a hypnotic drug with a safe profile of efficacy and adverse events. Indeed, when administered by non‐anesthesiologists, quick access to emergency care must be provided, especially in airway events. The use of propofol in other scenarios must be better studied, aiming to reduce the limitations of its administration by general pediatricians.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100742,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","volume":"96 3","pages":"Pages 289-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.07.008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553620300069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the main indications and assess the most common adverse events with the administration of hypnotic propofol in most pediatric clinical scenarios.

Sources

A systematic review of PubMed, SciELO, Cochrane, and EMBASE was performed, using filters such as a maximum of five years post‐publication, and/or references or articles of importance, with emphasis on clinical trials using propofol. All articles of major relevance were blind‐reviewed by both authors according to the PRISMA statement, looking for possible bias and limitations or the quality of the articles.

Summary of the findings

Through the search criterion applied, 417 articles were found, and their abstracts evaluated. A total of 69 papers were thoroughly studied. Articles about propofol use in children are increasing, including in neonates, with the majority being cohort studies and clinical trials in two main scenarios: upper digestive endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. A huge list of adverse events has been published, but most articles considered them of low risk.

Conclusions

Propofol is a hypnotic drug with a safe profile of efficacy and adverse events. Indeed, when administered by non‐anesthesiologists, quick access to emergency care must be provided, especially in airway events. The use of propofol in other scenarios must be better studied, aiming to reduce the limitations of its administration by general pediatricians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿和儿童使用异丙酚:安全吗?系统回顾
目的确定催眠异丙酚在大多数儿科临床情况下的主要适应症和最常见的不良事件。对PubMed、SciELO、Cochrane和EMBASE进行了系统评价,使用诸如发表后最多5年的筛选,和/或重要的参考文献或文章,重点是使用异丙酚的临床试验。根据PRISMA声明,所有主要相关的文章都由两位作者进行盲评,寻找可能的偏倚和局限性或文章的质量。通过应用检索标准,共检索到417篇文献,并对其摘要进行了评价。对69篇论文进行了深入研究。关于异丙酚在儿童中使用的文章越来越多,包括在新生儿中,大多数是队列研究和两种主要情况下的临床试验:上消化道内窥镜检查和磁共振成像。已经发表了大量的不良事件清单,但大多数文章认为它们的风险很低。结论异丙酚是一种安全有效、不良反应少的催眠药物。事实上,当由非麻醉医师管理时,必须提供快速的急诊护理,特别是在气道事件中。异丙酚在其他情况下的使用必须进行更好的研究,旨在减少普通儿科医生给药的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of constipation in cystic fibrosis patients: a systematic review of observational studies Multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH and psychometric properties in gastroesophageal reflux: systematic review Evaluation of varicella vaccine effectiveness as public health tool for increasing scientific evidence and improving vaccination programs The importance of risk factors for bullying perpetration and victimization Low back pain in adolescents and association with sociodemographic factors, electronic devices, physical activity and mental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1