Endoscopic and histological characteristics in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis responsive and non‐responsive to proton pump inhibitors

Gabriela Guimarães Vieira , Luciana Bandeira Mendez Ribeiro , Sabine Kruger Truppel , Nelson Augusto Rosário Filho , Mário César Vieira
{"title":"Endoscopic and histological characteristics in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis responsive and non‐responsive to proton pump inhibitors","authors":"Gabriela Guimarães Vieira ,&nbsp;Luciana Bandeira Mendez Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Sabine Kruger Truppel ,&nbsp;Nelson Augusto Rosário Filho ,&nbsp;Mário César Vieira","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.05.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare endoscopic and histologic features of pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) responding to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to those not responding to PPI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Endoscopic reports and photographs of patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and ≥15 eosinophils per high-powered field (eos/hpf) in esophageal biopsies prior to PPI trial were reviewed. Patients were classified as responsive to PPI (PPIREoE) or non-responsive to PPI (PPINREoE) according to response totreatment (&lt;15 eos/hpf) at second endoscopy after 8 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 231 patients (72.3% male), 64 (27.7%) were responsive to the proton pump inhibitors. Edema (77.3% <em>vs</em>. 62.5%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.031) and vertical lines (69.5% <em>vs</em>. 51.6%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014) were more frequent in PPINREoE patients. An eosinophil count in the mid‐esophagus ≥ 35 eos/HPF (25.1% <em>vs</em>. 12.5%) was more frequent in these patients (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). Those with eosinophil count &lt;<!--> <!-->15 eos/HPF in the mid‐esophagus at the first endoscopy were more likely to respond to treatment with proton pump inhibitors compared to patients with 15‐34 eos/HPF (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004, OR: 3.26, 95% CI: 1.46‐7.24) and to patients with ≥ 35 eos/HPF (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006, OR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.39‐7.41).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Edema and vertical lines at the endoscopy and a higher eosinophil count in the mid‐esophagus were more frequent in patients who were non‐responsive to proton pump inhibitors. As there were no significant differences in the other findings between the groups, it cannot be affirmed that these characteristics are sufficient to differentiate between PPINREoE and PPIREoE patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100742,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","volume":"96 5","pages":"Pages 638-643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.05.028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553619301454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare endoscopic and histologic features of pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) responding to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to those not responding to PPI.

Methods

Endoscopic reports and photographs of patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and ≥15 eosinophils per high-powered field (eos/hpf) in esophageal biopsies prior to PPI trial were reviewed. Patients were classified as responsive to PPI (PPIREoE) or non-responsive to PPI (PPINREoE) according to response totreatment (<15 eos/hpf) at second endoscopy after 8 weeks.

Results

Of the 231 patients (72.3% male), 64 (27.7%) were responsive to the proton pump inhibitors. Edema (77.3% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.031) and vertical lines (69.5% vs. 51.6%, p = 0.014) were more frequent in PPINREoE patients. An eosinophil count in the mid‐esophagus ≥ 35 eos/HPF (25.1% vs. 12.5%) was more frequent in these patients (p = 0.001). Those with eosinophil count < 15 eos/HPF in the mid‐esophagus at the first endoscopy were more likely to respond to treatment with proton pump inhibitors compared to patients with 15‐34 eos/HPF (p = 0.004, OR: 3.26, 95% CI: 1.46‐7.24) and to patients with ≥ 35 eos/HPF (p = 0.006, OR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.39‐7.41).

Conclusion

Edema and vertical lines at the endoscopy and a higher eosinophil count in the mid‐esophagus were more frequent in patients who were non‐responsive to proton pump inhibitors. As there were no significant differences in the other findings between the groups, it cannot be affirmed that these characteristics are sufficient to differentiate between PPINREoE and PPIREoE patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对质子泵抑制剂有反应和无反应的嗜酸性食管炎患者的内镜和组织学特征
目的比较小儿嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE)对质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的内镜和组织学特征。方法回顾性分析PPI试验前食管活检中有食道功能障碍症状且每高倍视野(eos/hpf)嗜酸性粒细胞≥15的患者的内镜报告和照片。根据8周后第二次内镜检查对治疗的反应(<15 eos/hpf),将患者分为PPI反应(PPIREoE)或PPI无反应(PPINREoE)。结果231例患者(男性72.3%)中,64例(27.7%)对质子泵抑制剂有反应。水肿(77.3%比62.5%,p = 0.031)和垂直线(69.5%比51.6%,p = 0.014)在ppinree患者中更为常见。食管中部嗜酸性粒细胞计数≥35eos /HPF(25.1%对12.5%)在这些患者中更为常见(p = 0.001)。嗜酸性粒细胞计数<与15 ~ 34 eos/HPF的患者(p = 0.004, OR: 3.26, 95% CI: 1.46 ~ 7.24)和≥35 eos/HPF的患者(p = 0.006, OR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.39 ~ 7.41)相比,第一次内镜检查时食管中部的15 eos/HPF患者更有可能对质子泵抑制剂治疗产生反应。结论对质子泵抑制剂无反应的患者食管中部出现水肿、垂直线和较高的嗜酸性粒细胞计数更为常见。由于两组之间的其他发现没有显著差异,因此不能肯定这些特征足以区分PPINREoE和PPIREoE患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of constipation in cystic fibrosis patients: a systematic review of observational studies Multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH and psychometric properties in gastroesophageal reflux: systematic review Evaluation of varicella vaccine effectiveness as public health tool for increasing scientific evidence and improving vaccination programs The importance of risk factors for bullying perpetration and victimization Low back pain in adolescents and association with sociodemographic factors, electronic devices, physical activity and mental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1