Pedro Celiny Ramos Garcia , Cristian Tedesco Tonial , Jefferson Pedro Piva
{"title":"Septic shock in pediatrics: the state‐of‐the‐art","authors":"Pedro Celiny Ramos Garcia , Cristian Tedesco Tonial , Jefferson Pedro Piva","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Review the main aspects of the definition, diagnosis, and management of pediatric patients with sepsis and septic shock.</p></div><div><h3>Source of data</h3><p>A search was carried out in the MEDLINE and Embase databases. The articles were chosen according to the authors’ interest, prioritizing those published in the last five years.</p></div><div><h3>Synthesis of data</h3><p>Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality in pediatric patients. The variability of clinical presentations makes it difficult to attain a precise definition in pediatrics. Airway stabilization with adequate oxygenation and ventilation if necessary, initial volume resuscitation, antibiotic administration, and cardiovascular support are the basis of sepsis treatment. In resource‐poor settings, attention should be paid to the risks of fluid overload when administrating fluids. Administration of vasoactive drugs such as epinephrine or norepinephrine is necessary in the absence of volume response within the first hour. Follow‐up of shock treatment should adhere to targets such as restoring vital and clinical signs of shock and controlling the focus of infection. A multimodal evaluation with bedside ultrasound for management after the first hours is recommended. In refractory shock, attention should be given to situations such as cardiac tamponade, hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, abdominal catastrophe, and focus of uncontrolled infection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The implementation of protocols and advanced technologies have reduced sepsis mortality. In resource‐poor settings, good practices such as early sepsis identification, antibiotic administration, and careful fluid infusion are the cornerstones of sepsis management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100742,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","volume":"96 ","pages":"Pages 87-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.10.007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553619302010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Review the main aspects of the definition, diagnosis, and management of pediatric patients with sepsis and septic shock.
Source of data
A search was carried out in the MEDLINE and Embase databases. The articles were chosen according to the authors’ interest, prioritizing those published in the last five years.
Synthesis of data
Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality in pediatric patients. The variability of clinical presentations makes it difficult to attain a precise definition in pediatrics. Airway stabilization with adequate oxygenation and ventilation if necessary, initial volume resuscitation, antibiotic administration, and cardiovascular support are the basis of sepsis treatment. In resource‐poor settings, attention should be paid to the risks of fluid overload when administrating fluids. Administration of vasoactive drugs such as epinephrine or norepinephrine is necessary in the absence of volume response within the first hour. Follow‐up of shock treatment should adhere to targets such as restoring vital and clinical signs of shock and controlling the focus of infection. A multimodal evaluation with bedside ultrasound for management after the first hours is recommended. In refractory shock, attention should be given to situations such as cardiac tamponade, hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, abdominal catastrophe, and focus of uncontrolled infection.
Conclusions
The implementation of protocols and advanced technologies have reduced sepsis mortality. In resource‐poor settings, good practices such as early sepsis identification, antibiotic administration, and careful fluid infusion are the cornerstones of sepsis management.