Comparing global tourism flows measured by official census and social sensing

Q1 Social Sciences Online Social Networks and Media Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100204
Lucas E.B. Skora , Helen C.M. Senefonte , Myriam Regattieri Delgado , Ricardo Lüders , Thiago H. Silva
{"title":"Comparing global tourism flows measured by official census and social sensing","authors":"Lucas E.B. Skora ,&nbsp;Helen C.M. Senefonte ,&nbsp;Myriam Regattieri Delgado ,&nbsp;Ricardo Lüders ,&nbsp;Thiago H. Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A better understanding of the behavior of tourists is strategic for improving services in the competitive and important economic segment of global tourism. Critical studies in the literature often explore the issue using traditional data, such as questionnaires or interviews. Traditional approaches provide precious information; however, they impose challenges to obtaining large-scale data, making it hard to study worldwide patterns. Location-based social networks (LBSNs) can potentially mitigate such issues due to the relatively low cost of acquiring large amounts of behavioral data. Nevertheless, before using such data for studying tourists’ behavior, it is necessary to verify whether the information adequately reveals the behavior measured with traditional data — considered the ground truth. Thus, the present work investigates in which countries the global tourism network measured with an LBSN agreeably reflects the behavior estimated by the World Tourism Organization using traditional methods. Although we could find exceptions, the results suggest that, for most countries, LBSN data can satisfactorily represent the behavior studied. We have an indication that, in countries with high correlations between results obtained from both datasets, LBSN data can be used in research regarding the mobility of the tourists in the studied context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696422000088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A better understanding of the behavior of tourists is strategic for improving services in the competitive and important economic segment of global tourism. Critical studies in the literature often explore the issue using traditional data, such as questionnaires or interviews. Traditional approaches provide precious information; however, they impose challenges to obtaining large-scale data, making it hard to study worldwide patterns. Location-based social networks (LBSNs) can potentially mitigate such issues due to the relatively low cost of acquiring large amounts of behavioral data. Nevertheless, before using such data for studying tourists’ behavior, it is necessary to verify whether the information adequately reveals the behavior measured with traditional data — considered the ground truth. Thus, the present work investigates in which countries the global tourism network measured with an LBSN agreeably reflects the behavior estimated by the World Tourism Organization using traditional methods. Although we could find exceptions, the results suggest that, for most countries, LBSN data can satisfactorily represent the behavior studied. We have an indication that, in countries with high correlations between results obtained from both datasets, LBSN data can be used in research regarding the mobility of the tourists in the studied context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较官方人口普查和社会感知测量的全球旅游流量
更好地了解游客的行为对于改善全球旅游业竞争激烈和重要的经济部门的服务具有战略意义。文献中的批判性研究通常使用传统数据(如问卷调查或访谈)来探索这个问题。传统方法提供了宝贵的信息;然而,它们给获取大规模数据带来了挑战,使得研究全球模式变得困难。基于位置的社交网络(LBSNs)可以潜在地缓解这些问题,因为获取大量行为数据的成本相对较低。然而,在使用这些数据来研究游客的行为之前,有必要验证这些信息是否充分揭示了传统数据所测量的行为——考虑到基本事实。因此,本研究调查了在哪些国家,用LBSN测量的全球旅游网络能很好地反映世界旅游组织使用传统方法估计的行为。尽管我们可以发现例外,但结果表明,对于大多数国家,LBSN数据可以令人满意地代表所研究的行为。我们有一个迹象表明,在从两个数据集获得的结果之间具有高度相关性的国家,LBSN数据可以用于研究研究背景下的游客流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
How does user-generated content on Social Media affect stock predictions? A case study on GameStop Measuring centralization of online platforms through size and interconnection of communities Crowdsourcing the Mitigation of disinformation and misinformation: The case of spontaneous community-based moderation on Reddit GASCOM: Graph-based Attentive Semantic Context Modeling for Online Conversation Understanding The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1