Comparing spatial capture–recapture modeling and nest count methods to estimate orangutan densities in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2015-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.013
Stephanie N. Spehar , Brent Loken , Yaya Rayadin , J. Andrew Royle
{"title":"Comparing spatial capture–recapture modeling and nest count methods to estimate orangutan densities in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia","authors":"Stephanie N. Spehar ,&nbsp;Brent Loken ,&nbsp;Yaya Rayadin ,&nbsp;J. Andrew Royle","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Accurate information on the density and abundance of animal populations is essential for understanding species' ecology and for conservation planning, but is difficult to obtain. The endangered orangutan (</span><span><em>Pongo</em></span> spp.) is an example; due to its elusive behavior and low densities, researchers have relied on methods that convert nest counts to orangutan densities and require substantial effort for reliable results. Camera trapping and spatial capture–recapture (SCR) models could provide an alternative but have not been used for primates. We compared density estimates calculated using the two methods for orangutans in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Camera trapping/SCR modeling produced a density estimate of 0.16<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.09–0.29 indiv/km<sup>2</sup>, and nest counts produced a density estimate of 1.05<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.18–6.01 indiv/km<sup>2</sup>. The large confidence interval of the nest count estimate is probably due to high variance in nest encounter rates, indicating the need for larger sample size and the substantial effort required to produce reliable results using this method. The SCR estimate produced a very low density estimate and had a narrower but still fairly wide confidence interval. This was likely due to unmodeled heterogeneity and small sample size, specifically a low number of individual captures and recaptures. We propose methodological fixes that could address these issues and improve precision. A comparison of the overall costs and benefits of the two methods suggests that camera trapping/SCR modeling can potentially be a useful tool for assessing the densities of orangutans and other elusive primates, and warrant further investigation to determine broad applicability and methodological adjustments needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"191 ","pages":"Pages 185-193"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.013","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320715002360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Accurate information on the density and abundance of animal populations is essential for understanding species' ecology and for conservation planning, but is difficult to obtain. The endangered orangutan (Pongo spp.) is an example; due to its elusive behavior and low densities, researchers have relied on methods that convert nest counts to orangutan densities and require substantial effort for reliable results. Camera trapping and spatial capture–recapture (SCR) models could provide an alternative but have not been used for primates. We compared density estimates calculated using the two methods for orangutans in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Camera trapping/SCR modeling produced a density estimate of 0.16 ± 0.09–0.29 indiv/km2, and nest counts produced a density estimate of 1.05 ± 0.18–6.01 indiv/km2. The large confidence interval of the nest count estimate is probably due to high variance in nest encounter rates, indicating the need for larger sample size and the substantial effort required to produce reliable results using this method. The SCR estimate produced a very low density estimate and had a narrower but still fairly wide confidence interval. This was likely due to unmodeled heterogeneity and small sample size, specifically a low number of individual captures and recaptures. We propose methodological fixes that could address these issues and improve precision. A comparison of the overall costs and benefits of the two methods suggests that camera trapping/SCR modeling can potentially be a useful tool for assessing the densities of orangutans and other elusive primates, and warrant further investigation to determine broad applicability and methodological adjustments needed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较空间捕获-再捕获模型和巢穴计数方法来估计印度尼西亚东加里曼丹Wehea森林的猩猩密度
关于动物种群密度和丰度的准确信息对于了解物种生态和保护规划至关重要,但很难获得。濒临灭绝的猩猩(Pongo种)就是一个例子;由于其难以捉摸的行为和低密度,研究人员依赖于将巢数转换为猩猩密度的方法,需要大量的努力才能获得可靠的结果。相机捕获和空间捕获-再捕获(SCR)模型可以提供另一种选择,但尚未用于灵长类动物。我们比较了在印度尼西亚东加里曼丹Wehea森林中使用两种方法计算的猩猩密度估算值。摄像机捕获/SCR建模得出的密度估计值为0.16±0.09-0.29只/km2,巢计数得出的密度估计值为1.05±0.18-6.01只/km2。巢数估计的大置信区间可能是由于巢相遇率的高方差,这表明需要更大的样本量和使用这种方法产生可靠结果所需的大量努力。SCR估计值产生了非常低的密度估计值,并且具有较窄但仍然相当宽的置信区间。这可能是由于未建模的异质性和小样本量,特别是个体捕获和再捕获的数量较少。我们提出了可以解决这些问题并提高精度的方法修复。对两种方法的总体成本和收益的比较表明,摄像机陷阱/SCR建模可能是评估猩猩和其他难以捉摸的灵长类动物密度的有用工具,值得进一步研究以确定广泛的适用性和需要的方法调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
Connectivity structure in fragmented forest areas in the Brazilian Amazon Linking disperser traits and habitat quality to seed dispersal effectiveness Ecological trade-offs of mechanical thinning in temperate forests Taking the pulse of the world's raptors — A systematic quantitative review of wildlife rehabilitation centre admissions Recovery of tree-related microhabitats in a tropical rainforest after agricultural abandonment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1