The supply and demand for Federal Reserve deposits

James D. Hamilton
{"title":"The supply and demand for Federal Reserve deposits","authors":"James D. Hamilton","doi":"10.1016/S0167-2231(99)00002-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper argues that the following ingredients are necessary in order to draw causal inference from historical correlations: explication of the real-world mechanism that is supposed to have produced a proposed structural relation; the existence of a natural experiment through which the data were generated; and extensive statistical corroboration of the econometric model. This research strategy is employed in an effort to identify the sources of disturbances to the supply and demand for Federal Reserve deposits. The effect of a shock in the supply of reserves on the federal funds rate depends on the marginal benefits banks perceive to holding excess reserves and the marginal costs of discount window borrowing. We find empirically that a temporary shock to the supply of reserves will only induce banks to borrow at the discount window if it occurs on settlement Wednesday or the last day of the quarter. The structural estimates presented here suggest that a $1 billion loss in reserves will raise the federal funds rate by 6.6 basis points if it occurs on settlement Wednesday or the last day of a quarter and by 2.6 basis points if it occurs on other days. A number of alternative sources of evidence are used to corroborate these structural estimates and to provide independent statistically significant confirmation that a reduction in the supply of reserves clearly raises the overnight interest rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100218,"journal":{"name":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 1-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-2231(99)00002-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167223199000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper argues that the following ingredients are necessary in order to draw causal inference from historical correlations: explication of the real-world mechanism that is supposed to have produced a proposed structural relation; the existence of a natural experiment through which the data were generated; and extensive statistical corroboration of the econometric model. This research strategy is employed in an effort to identify the sources of disturbances to the supply and demand for Federal Reserve deposits. The effect of a shock in the supply of reserves on the federal funds rate depends on the marginal benefits banks perceive to holding excess reserves and the marginal costs of discount window borrowing. We find empirically that a temporary shock to the supply of reserves will only induce banks to borrow at the discount window if it occurs on settlement Wednesday or the last day of the quarter. The structural estimates presented here suggest that a $1 billion loss in reserves will raise the federal funds rate by 6.6 basis points if it occurs on settlement Wednesday or the last day of a quarter and by 2.6 basis points if it occurs on other days. A number of alternative sources of evidence are used to corroborate these structural estimates and to provide independent statistically significant confirmation that a reduction in the supply of reserves clearly raises the overnight interest rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美联储存款的供给和需求
本文认为,为了从历史相关性中得出因果推论,以下因素是必要的:解释被认为产生了拟议结构关系的现实世界机制;数据产生的自然实验的存在;并对计量经济模型进行了广泛的统计证实。这一研究策略被用来确定干扰美联储存款供需的来源。准备金供给的冲击对联邦基金利率的影响取决于银行持有超额准备金的边际收益和贴现窗口借款的边际成本。我们从经验上发现,对准备金供应的暂时冲击,只有在周三结算日或季度最后一天发生时,才会促使银行在贴现窗口借款。本文提出的结构性估计表明,如果储备损失10亿美元发生在周三结算日或季度最后一天,将使联邦基金利率上升6.6个基点,如果发生在其他日子,将使联邦基金利率上升2.6个基点。一些替代证据来源被用来证实这些结构性估计,并提供独立的统计上显著的证实,即储备供应的减少明显提高了隔夜利率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A quantitative model of the British industrial revolution, 1780–1850 a comment Searching for prosperity a comment Computers and growth with frictions: aggregate and disaggregate evidence A comment Computers and growth with frictions: aggregate and disaggregate evidence Deunionization, technical change, and inequality A comment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1