Vaginal hysterectomy

Neelam Batra , Derek Tuffnell
{"title":"Vaginal hysterectomy","authors":"Neelam Batra ,&nbsp;Derek Tuffnell","doi":"10.1016/j.rigp.2003.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In spite of being an eminent procedure in the repertoire of gynaecological practice there is no consensus on the best way of performing a hysterectomy in any particular clinical situation. Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is associated with lower morbidity; fewer complications; shorter hospital stay and convalescence in comparison to abdominal hysterectomy (AH). VH is also more cost effective in comparison to laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) as the latter is expensive in terms of operating time and cost of equipment. It should not follow, therefore, that less than one-third of all hysterectomies are being performed vaginally.</p><p>There are two main factors influencing the type of surgery offered to the patient, namely the patient characteristics and the experience and preference of individual surgeons. Patient characteristics such as nulliparity and the large fibroid uterus serve as relative contraindications to vaginal surgery and hence the more inexperienced surgeon would traditionally opt for the abdominal approach. Special procedures have been suggested, however, which enable VH to be successfully performed in these patients. By educating the surgeon and encouraging the implementation of these techniques, the rates of VH can be maximised in order to provide the most optimal and cost effective service to women.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101089,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 82-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigp.2003.12.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471769703001424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In spite of being an eminent procedure in the repertoire of gynaecological practice there is no consensus on the best way of performing a hysterectomy in any particular clinical situation. Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is associated with lower morbidity; fewer complications; shorter hospital stay and convalescence in comparison to abdominal hysterectomy (AH). VH is also more cost effective in comparison to laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) as the latter is expensive in terms of operating time and cost of equipment. It should not follow, therefore, that less than one-third of all hysterectomies are being performed vaginally.

There are two main factors influencing the type of surgery offered to the patient, namely the patient characteristics and the experience and preference of individual surgeons. Patient characteristics such as nulliparity and the large fibroid uterus serve as relative contraindications to vaginal surgery and hence the more inexperienced surgeon would traditionally opt for the abdominal approach. Special procedures have been suggested, however, which enable VH to be successfully performed in these patients. By educating the surgeon and encouraging the implementation of these techniques, the rates of VH can be maximised in order to provide the most optimal and cost effective service to women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴道子宫切除术
尽管子宫切除术在妇科实践中是一项杰出的手术,但在任何特定的临床情况下,对执行子宫切除术的最佳方法尚无共识。阴道子宫切除术(VH)的发病率较低;更少的并发症;与腹式子宫切除术(AH)相比,住院时间和恢复期更短。与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术(LAVH)相比,VH更具成本效益,因为后者在手术时间和设备成本方面都很昂贵。因此,不应据此推断,不到三分之一的子宫切除术是通过阴道进行的。有两个主要因素影响手术的类型提供给病人,即病人的特点和经验和偏好的个别外科医生。患者的特点,如无生育和大肌瘤子宫是阴道手术的相对禁忌症,因此更缺乏经验的外科医生通常会选择腹部手术。然而,建议采用特殊手术,使VH能够在这些患者中成功实施。通过教育外科医生和鼓励实施这些技术,可以最大限度地提高VH率,以便为妇女提供最优和最具成本效益的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Non-surgical management of urinary stress incontinence Common congenital anomalies of the female genital tract Investigations for chronic pelvic pain How to manage locally advanced primary and recurrent cancer of the uterine cervix: The surgeon's view
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1