{"title":"How to manage locally advanced primary and recurrent cancer of the uterine cervix: The surgeon's view","authors":"Michael Höckel, Nadja Dornhöfer","doi":"10.1016/j.rigp.2005.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix covers a broad disease spectrum comprising primary tumours of >4<!--> <!-->cm in size or FIGO stage >IIA and all local tumour relapses except the rare cases of small recurrences in a retained cervix. Treatment designs have to consider the probability of pelvic and periaortic lymph node metastases and – albeit less frequent in primary disease – distant metastases.</p><p>Established treatment standards aiming to achieve pelvic and eventually periaortic tumour control are chemoradiation for locally advanced primary disease as well as post-surgical pelvic recurrences, and pelvic exenteration for post-radiation central relapses. A subset of patients with pelvic side wall relapses can now be successfully treated by laterally extended endopelvic resection as well. Based on the current results it is not evident whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radical hysterectomy and eventually adjuvant radiation are comparable or superior treatment alternatives for locally advanced intermediate stage cases. Likewise, the benefit of (laparoscopic) surgical staging including the exstirpation of bulky pelvic and periaortic lymph nodes has not been convincingly demonstrated to date. Both surgical treatment concepts need further well-designed prospective randomized trials for their evaluation. From the surgeon's perspective total mesometrial resection, therapeutic lymph node dissection, laterally extended endopelvic resection and new developments in restoration/substitution of pelvic functions have the potential to improve the therapeutic index for defined cohorts of patients suffering from locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101089,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 212-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigp.2005.09.003","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147176970500081X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix covers a broad disease spectrum comprising primary tumours of >4 cm in size or FIGO stage >IIA and all local tumour relapses except the rare cases of small recurrences in a retained cervix. Treatment designs have to consider the probability of pelvic and periaortic lymph node metastases and – albeit less frequent in primary disease – distant metastases.
Established treatment standards aiming to achieve pelvic and eventually periaortic tumour control are chemoradiation for locally advanced primary disease as well as post-surgical pelvic recurrences, and pelvic exenteration for post-radiation central relapses. A subset of patients with pelvic side wall relapses can now be successfully treated by laterally extended endopelvic resection as well. Based on the current results it is not evident whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radical hysterectomy and eventually adjuvant radiation are comparable or superior treatment alternatives for locally advanced intermediate stage cases. Likewise, the benefit of (laparoscopic) surgical staging including the exstirpation of bulky pelvic and periaortic lymph nodes has not been convincingly demonstrated to date. Both surgical treatment concepts need further well-designed prospective randomized trials for their evaluation. From the surgeon's perspective total mesometrial resection, therapeutic lymph node dissection, laterally extended endopelvic resection and new developments in restoration/substitution of pelvic functions have the potential to improve the therapeutic index for defined cohorts of patients suffering from locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix.