Pollution and congestion in urban areas: The effects of low emission zones

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Transportation Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100221
Valeria Bernardo , Xavier Fageda , Ricardo Flores-Fillol
{"title":"Pollution and congestion in urban areas: The effects of low emission zones","authors":"Valeria Bernardo ,&nbsp;Xavier Fageda ,&nbsp;Ricardo Flores-Fillol","doi":"10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The great weight that the car has as a means of mobility in large cities generates significant negative externalities both in terms of pollution and congestion. The goal of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of low emission zones (LEZs) and to compare it with the existing results in literature on the effectiveness of urban tolls. First, we build up a theoretical model that departs from De Borger and Proost (2012), who study the effects of urban tolls on congestion, by incorporating pollution into the analysis and LEZs as an alternative (quantity-based) policy measure. Then we perform an econometric analysis taking advantage of a unique and extremely original panel of large European urban areas over the period 2008–2016, using data on congestion from TomTom and data on pollution (PM2.5) from environmental sciences. We conclude that LEZs can curb pollution. They are particularly effective in highly polluted cities, when they are applied to a wide area of the city, and/or when they are stringent in the type of restricted vehicles. Instead, LEZs are ineffective in mitigating congestion. This is a very relevant result, given the growing importance of LEZs in Europe.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45761,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transportation","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100221","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212012221000265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The great weight that the car has as a means of mobility in large cities generates significant negative externalities both in terms of pollution and congestion. The goal of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of low emission zones (LEZs) and to compare it with the existing results in literature on the effectiveness of urban tolls. First, we build up a theoretical model that departs from De Borger and Proost (2012), who study the effects of urban tolls on congestion, by incorporating pollution into the analysis and LEZs as an alternative (quantity-based) policy measure. Then we perform an econometric analysis taking advantage of a unique and extremely original panel of large European urban areas over the period 2008–2016, using data on congestion from TomTom and data on pollution (PM2.5) from environmental sciences. We conclude that LEZs can curb pollution. They are particularly effective in highly polluted cities, when they are applied to a wide area of the city, and/or when they are stringent in the type of restricted vehicles. Instead, LEZs are ineffective in mitigating congestion. This is a very relevant result, given the growing importance of LEZs in Europe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市地区的污染和拥堵:低排放区的影响
汽车作为大城市交通工具的巨大重量,在污染和拥堵方面产生了显著的负外部性。本文的目的是检验低排放区(LEZs)的有效性,并将其与现有文献中关于城市收费有效性的结果进行比较。首先,我们建立了一个理论模型,该模型与De Borger和Proost(2012)不同,他们研究了城市通行费对拥堵的影响,将污染纳入分析,并将lez作为一种替代(基于数量的)政策措施。然后,我们利用2008年至2016年期间欧洲大型城市地区的独特且极其原始的面板,使用TomTom的拥堵数据和环境科学的污染(PM2.5)数据进行计量经济学分析。我们得出结论,lez可以抑制污染。在污染严重的城市,当它们适用于城市的大范围,和/或当它们对限制车辆的类型严格时,它们特别有效。相反,lez在缓解拥堵方面是无效的。鉴于lez在欧洲日益重要,这是一个非常相关的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Free rides to cleaner air? Examining the impact of massive public transport fare discounts on air quality Unionised dockworkers and port ownership structure in an international oligopoly Editorial Board Microgeographic speed, reliability, and traffic externalities Pricing effects of code-sharing in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1