Risk Characterization: A Bridge to Informed Decision Making

Edward V. Ohanian , John A. Moore , John R. Fowle III , Gilbert S. Omenn , Steven C. Lewis , George M. Gray , D.Warner North
{"title":"Risk Characterization: A Bridge to Informed Decision Making","authors":"Edward V. Ohanian ,&nbsp;John A. Moore ,&nbsp;John R. Fowle III ,&nbsp;Gilbert S. Omenn ,&nbsp;Steven C. Lewis ,&nbsp;George M. Gray ,&nbsp;D.Warner North","doi":"10.1006/faat.1997.2358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Regulatory decisions should be made in the most expert and informed way since they are precipitated by real and perceived threats to human health, under the glare of public scrutiny. In 1994, the National Research Council (NRC) reported that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) overall approach to assessing risks is fundamentally sound, but the Agency must more clearly establish the scientific and policy basis for risk estimates and better communicate the associated uncertainties. On March 21, 1995, USEPA issued a risk characterization policy and guidance. In this policy, an effective risk characterization must fully and clearly characterize risks and disclose the scientific analysis, uncertainties, assumptions, and science policy that underlie decisions throughout the risk assessment process. A number of regulatory reform bills which required risk characterization as part of all Federal risk assessments were introduced by the 104th Congress. The purpose of this workshop was to familiarize Society of Toxicology members with: (1) key elements to be considered in risk characterization and (2) new advances in risk characterization addressed by Federal and State agencies, industry, academia, NRC, and Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Furthermore, the main objective was to engage the audience in discussing the proper role of science in risk assessment–risk management interface to make informed decisions in the face of scientific uncertainty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100557,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","volume":"39 2","pages":"Pages 81-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/faat.1997.2358","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272059097923587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulatory decisions should be made in the most expert and informed way since they are precipitated by real and perceived threats to human health, under the glare of public scrutiny. In 1994, the National Research Council (NRC) reported that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) overall approach to assessing risks is fundamentally sound, but the Agency must more clearly establish the scientific and policy basis for risk estimates and better communicate the associated uncertainties. On March 21, 1995, USEPA issued a risk characterization policy and guidance. In this policy, an effective risk characterization must fully and clearly characterize risks and disclose the scientific analysis, uncertainties, assumptions, and science policy that underlie decisions throughout the risk assessment process. A number of regulatory reform bills which required risk characterization as part of all Federal risk assessments were introduced by the 104th Congress. The purpose of this workshop was to familiarize Society of Toxicology members with: (1) key elements to be considered in risk characterization and (2) new advances in risk characterization addressed by Federal and State agencies, industry, academia, NRC, and Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Furthermore, the main objective was to engage the audience in discussing the proper role of science in risk assessment–risk management interface to make informed decisions in the face of scientific uncertainty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险表征:通向知情决策的桥梁
管制决定应以最专业和最知情的方式作出,因为这些决定是在公众监督的注视下,由对人类健康的实际和感知威胁促成的。1994年,美国国家研究委员会(NRC)报告称,美国环境保护署(USEPA)评估风险的总体方法基本上是合理的,但该机构必须更清楚地建立风险评估的科学和政策基础,并更好地沟通相关的不确定性。1995年3月21日,美国环保署发布了一项风险描述政策和指南。在这一政策中,有效的风险描述必须充分而清晰地描述风险,并揭示贯穿风险评估过程的科学分析、不确定性、假设和科学政策。第104届国会提出了一系列监管改革法案,要求将风险定性作为所有联邦风险评估的一部分。本次研讨会的目的是使毒理学学会成员熟悉:(1)风险表征中需要考虑的关键因素;(2)联邦和州机构、工业界、学术界、NRC和总统/国会风险评估和风险管理委员会在风险表征方面的新进展。此外,主要目标是让听众参与讨论科学在风险评估-风险管理界面中的适当作用,以便在面对科学不确定性时做出明智的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rat Olfactory Mucosa Displays a High Activity in Metabolizing Methyltert-butyl Ether and Other Gasoline Ethers Assessment of Respiratory Hypersensitivity in Guinea Pigs Sensitized to Toluene Diisocyanate: Improvements on Analysis of Respiratory Response Intratracheal Inhalation vs Intratracheal Instillation: Differences in Particle Effects Differences in Caffeine 3-Demethylation Activity among Inbred Mouse Strains: A Comparison of HepaticCyp1a2Gene Expression between Two Inbred Strains Ketoconazole Impairs Early Pregnancy and the Decidual Cell Response via Alterations in Ovarian Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1