Assessment of Respiratory Hypersensitivity in Guinea Pigs Sensitized to Toluene Diisocyanate: Improvements on Analysis of Respiratory Response

Jürgen Pauluhn
{"title":"Assessment of Respiratory Hypersensitivity in Guinea Pigs Sensitized to Toluene Diisocyanate: Improvements on Analysis of Respiratory Response","authors":"Jürgen Pauluhn","doi":"10.1006/faat.1997.2393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Groups of guinea pigs of the Hartley strain were sensitized to toluene diisocyanate (TDI) by combined single intradermal injection and repeated inhalation exposure (3 h/day for 5 consecutive days) to 0, 3.8, 11, 26, 46, and 51 mg TDI/m<sup>3</sup>air. One group of animals was sensitized by intradermal injection only. Sham-exposed and TDI–polyisocyanate resin-sensitized guinea pigs served as controls. Three weeks after the first encounter with the inducing agent, animals were challenged with the free TDI (approximately 0.5 mg/m<sup>3</sup>) and 1 week later with TDI–guinea pig serum albumin conjugate. Breathing patterns were analyzed by objective mathematical procedures taking into account the intensity and duration of the respiratory rate exceeding ±3 standard deviations of the individual prechallenge exposure period. In none of the animals challenged with TDI were conclusive immediate-onset respiratory responses identified. During the TDI conjugate challenge a characteristic increase in respiratory rate was observed in all groups sensitized with TDI. In each of the sham and TDI–resin control groups, 1 of 16 animals responded mildly to the conjugate challenge. With regard to analysis of the development of asthma-like dyspnea, the results obtained suggest that respiratory response can suitably be defined by objective mathematical analysis of breathing patterns. Moreover, the “duration” of response exceeding +3 × standard deviation of prechallenge baseline data appears to show less variability when compared to the “intensity” of response (area). It can be concluded that this method of evaluation of respiratory response may be useful to compare more quantitatively this type of data and serves the objective of decreasing potential interlaboratory variability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100557,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 211-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/faat.1997.2393","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272059097923939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Groups of guinea pigs of the Hartley strain were sensitized to toluene diisocyanate (TDI) by combined single intradermal injection and repeated inhalation exposure (3 h/day for 5 consecutive days) to 0, 3.8, 11, 26, 46, and 51 mg TDI/m3air. One group of animals was sensitized by intradermal injection only. Sham-exposed and TDI–polyisocyanate resin-sensitized guinea pigs served as controls. Three weeks after the first encounter with the inducing agent, animals were challenged with the free TDI (approximately 0.5 mg/m3) and 1 week later with TDI–guinea pig serum albumin conjugate. Breathing patterns were analyzed by objective mathematical procedures taking into account the intensity and duration of the respiratory rate exceeding ±3 standard deviations of the individual prechallenge exposure period. In none of the animals challenged with TDI were conclusive immediate-onset respiratory responses identified. During the TDI conjugate challenge a characteristic increase in respiratory rate was observed in all groups sensitized with TDI. In each of the sham and TDI–resin control groups, 1 of 16 animals responded mildly to the conjugate challenge. With regard to analysis of the development of asthma-like dyspnea, the results obtained suggest that respiratory response can suitably be defined by objective mathematical analysis of breathing patterns. Moreover, the “duration” of response exceeding +3 × standard deviation of prechallenge baseline data appears to show less variability when compared to the “intensity” of response (area). It can be concluded that this method of evaluation of respiratory response may be useful to compare more quantitatively this type of data and serves the objective of decreasing potential interlaboratory variability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲苯二异氰酸酯致敏豚鼠呼吸超敏反应的评估:呼吸反应分析的改进
将Hartley品系豚鼠分别以0、3.8、11、26、46和51 mg TDI/m3air进行单次皮内注射和重复吸入(3 h/d,连续5天)联合致敏。一组仅皮内注射致敏。假暴露和tdi -多异氰酸酯树脂致敏豚鼠作为对照。在首次接触诱导剂3周后,动物被注射游离TDI(约0.5 mg/m3), 1周后被注射TDI -豚鼠血清白蛋白偶联物。考虑到个体挑战前暴露期呼吸频率超过±3个标准差的强度和持续时间,采用客观的数学方法分析呼吸模式。在TDI攻击的动物中,没有发现结论性的立即发作呼吸反应。在TDI偶联激射期间,所有TDI致敏组均观察到呼吸频率的特征性增加。在假手术组和tdi -树脂对照组中,16只动物中有1只对偶联刺激有轻微反应。在分析哮喘样呼吸困难的发生过程时,得到的结果表明,呼吸反应可以通过对呼吸模式的客观数学分析来适当地定义。此外,与反应的“强度”(面积)相比,超过挑战前基线数据+3倍标准差的反应“持续时间”似乎表现出更小的变异性。可以得出结论,这种评估呼吸反应的方法可能有助于更定量地比较这类数据,并有助于减少潜在的实验室间变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rat Olfactory Mucosa Displays a High Activity in Metabolizing Methyltert-butyl Ether and Other Gasoline Ethers Assessment of Respiratory Hypersensitivity in Guinea Pigs Sensitized to Toluene Diisocyanate: Improvements on Analysis of Respiratory Response Intratracheal Inhalation vs Intratracheal Instillation: Differences in Particle Effects Differences in Caffeine 3-Demethylation Activity among Inbred Mouse Strains: A Comparison of HepaticCyp1a2Gene Expression between Two Inbred Strains Ketoconazole Impairs Early Pregnancy and the Decidual Cell Response via Alterations in Ovarian Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1