Understanding the role of uncertainty and anxiety in police decision-making during the investigation of sudden unexpected deaths in children

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.1002/jip.1583
Jonathan Holmes, Laura Boulton, Heather Panter
{"title":"Understanding the role of uncertainty and anxiety in police decision-making during the investigation of sudden unexpected deaths in children","authors":"Jonathan Holmes,&nbsp;Laura Boulton,&nbsp;Heather Panter","doi":"10.1002/jip.1583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Existing policing policy offers a rational approach to decision-making with minimal reference to human judgement within child death investigations. This study adopted a mixed methodology to capture decisional processes of 26 serving detective inspectors and detective sergeants whilst responding to an immersive scenario which simulated the first hours of a <i>Sudden and Unexpected Death in Children</i> (SUDC) investigation. Participants were presented with four decision points, during which they were asked to choose from decision options while reflecting upon personal and situational factors influencing that decision. Thematic analysis of responses found that investigators disclosed ‘anxiety’ and ‘uncertainty’ throughout their decision-making during the scenario. In addition, there was no evidence of investigators utilising the models formally advocated within policing literature to make their decisions and assessments. As a result, it is suggested that further improvements are made regarding investigative decision-making models within operational policing where ‘anxiety’ and ‘uncertainty’ is heightened.</p>","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jip.1583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing policing policy offers a rational approach to decision-making with minimal reference to human judgement within child death investigations. This study adopted a mixed methodology to capture decisional processes of 26 serving detective inspectors and detective sergeants whilst responding to an immersive scenario which simulated the first hours of a Sudden and Unexpected Death in Children (SUDC) investigation. Participants were presented with four decision points, during which they were asked to choose from decision options while reflecting upon personal and situational factors influencing that decision. Thematic analysis of responses found that investigators disclosed ‘anxiety’ and ‘uncertainty’ throughout their decision-making during the scenario. In addition, there was no evidence of investigators utilising the models formally advocated within policing literature to make their decisions and assessments. As a result, it is suggested that further improvements are made regarding investigative decision-making models within operational policing where ‘anxiety’ and ‘uncertainty’ is heightened.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解不确定性和焦虑在调查儿童突然意外死亡期间警察决策中的作用
现有的警务政策提供了一种理性的决策方法,在儿童死亡调查中尽量不考虑人的判断。本研究采用混合方法来捕捉26名在职侦探督察和侦探警长的决策过程,同时对模拟儿童突然意外死亡(SUDC)调查的最初几个小时的沉浸式场景做出反应。参与者有四个决策点,在此期间,他们被要求从决策选项中做出选择,同时考虑影响该决定的个人和情境因素。对调查结果的专题分析发现,调查人员在整个决策过程中都表现出“焦虑”和“不确定性”。此外,没有证据表明调查人员利用警务文献中正式提倡的模型来做出决定和评估。因此,建议在“焦虑”和“不确定性”加剧的业务警务中进一步改进调查决策模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling (JIP-OP) is an international journal of behavioural science contributions to criminal and civil investigations, for researchers and practitioners, also exploring the legal and jurisprudential implications of psychological and related aspects of all forms of investigation. Investigative Psychology is rapidly developing worldwide. It is a newly established, interdisciplinary area of research and application, concerned with the systematic, scientific examination of all those aspects of psychology and the related behavioural and social sciences that may be relevant to criminal.
期刊最新文献
The resister, the talker and the confessor: A closer look at suspect responses in investigative interviews Mental pathology in the field of personality and psychotic disorders, systematic review of its relationship with the commission of homicide and violent acts Cognitive interview conducted in‐person and over‐the‐phone for informants' memory of overheard conversations Issue Information The charade of discreetness: Exploring the paradoxical lifestyles of romance fraudsters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1